Cited by 1Afro-Latin American StudiesLatin American Cultural PoliticsLatin American socio-political dynamics

Repertorios y recursos de lucha del pueblo afroecuatoriano por la construcción de un Estado Intercultural en Ecuador: el frame del movimiento afroecuatoriano en la coyuntura de la Nueva Constitución (2008)

Open access
Mosquera, Katherine Iveth Chalá·2023·Zenodo

Abstract

The present academic work has a qualitative methodology and proposes to see the Afro-Ecuadorian organizational process as a social movement capable of deploying frames, repertoires and resources with the aim of erecting a plural, diverse and intercultural State, which goes beyond the corporatist vision that sees organizational processes reduced to interest groups moved by the establishment or as simple groups in action (Laraña 1996, 27). On the contrary, as Lao (2007) argues, it is intended to understand the expression of subaltern groups that propose to take anti-hegemonic and decolonial turns, as is the case of the Afro-Ecuadorian Social Movement (MSAE) in search of building an intercultural State, a proposal that has great advances reflected in the Ecuadorian Constitution of 2008. This essay presents a potentiality and a clear missing element. The strength is based on pointing to the MSAE as a movement and a long-term process; However, this phenomenon is not linear, but rather irregular. With the methodology used, long-term analysis can allow a better understanding of the ways in which resources, frameworks of meaning and, especially, repertoires are constructed in Afro-descendant social movements. Consequently, the cycles of protest, with ruptures, permanence’s and continuities, with heterogeneous repertoires of collective action, that have been sown within the MSAE, allow us to conclude that its process is far-reaching, and that, diachronically, there are ruptures in its objectives and strategies. Its permanence in time and space allowed it, as a movement, to be relevant in the Theory of Political Opportunities (EOP) opened by the 2008 Constitution in Ecuador.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.8147017

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Authors
Mosquera, K. I. C.
Corresponding author
Mosquera, Katherine Iveth Chalá
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2023-07-07
ISSN
2739-0063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384270958
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Revista InveCom (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Latin American socio-political dynamics
Keywords
intercultural state, social movements, collective action repertoires, political opportunity structure, Ecuadorian Constitution of 2008, Afro-descendants, decolonial struggles, subaltern groups, protest cycles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review