Cited by 43Neuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment

Chromogranin A measurement in metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: screening for false positives and a prospective follow-up study.

Open access
Vezzosi, Delphine, Walter, Thomas, Laplanche, Agnès, Raoul, Jean Luc, Dromain, Clarisse, Ruszniewski, Philippe, d'Herbomez, Michèle, Guigay, Joël +8 more·2011·The International Journal of Biological Markers

Abstract

Background: Multiple causes of false-positive chromogranin A (CgA) measurement have been reported that may affect its impact as a surrogate marker of RECIST progression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDGEPNET). Aims: 1) To evaluate the frequency of false-positive CgA results. 2) To prospectively compare CgA variations with RECIST morphological changes in patients without known causes of false-positive CgA measurements. Methods: First, the conditions responsible for potentially false-positive CgA measurements were screened in 184 consecutive patients with metastatic WDGEPNET. Secondly, a variation in CgA at a 6-month interval was compared to RECIST results at 6 months in 46 patients. Results: Among 184 patients, elevated CgA was found in 130 cases (71%) including 99 patients with at least one cause of a false-positive result. Impaired kidney function as well as medication with proton pump inhibitors were found to be the 2 major causes of false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of CgA measurements compared with morphological tumor changes according to the RECIST criteria were 71% and 50%, respectively, at 6 months. Conclusion: Routine screening for the causes of false-positive CgA measurements is mandatory in WDGEPNET patients. Our study does not validate the use of CgA as a surrogate marker of tumor progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5301/jbm.2011.8327

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chromogranin A levels may also be elevated in other disease processes, such as prostate cancer, liver failure, cardiovascular diseases and renal failure.

    “Chromogranin A levels may also be elevated in other disease processes, such as prostate cancer, liver failure, cardiovascular diseases and renal failure (Tramonti et al, 2001; Modlin et al, 2010; Vezzosi et al, 2011).”

    From Discontinuation of proton pump inhibitors during assessment of chromogranin A levels in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (2011) · cites this paper as Vezzosi et al, 2011

    The results (p. 96) identify renal failure and cardiac failure as conditions associated with elevated CgA. The paper does not establish the same point for liver failure or prostate cancer: it excludes severe hepatic dysfunction, and prostate carcinoma appears only in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Vezzosi et al. studied 184 NET patients and found 130 elevated CgA results; at least one false-positive CgA result was found in 99 patients, mostly caused by PPI therapy and impaired kidney function.

    “Vezzosi et al. (12) studied 184 NET patients and found 130 elevated CgA results.At least one false-positive CgA result was found in 99 patients, mostly caused by PPI therapy and impaired kidney function.”

    From Effect of Short-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment and Its Discontinuation on Chromogranin A in Healthy Subjects (2012) · cites this paper as [12]

    The results (p. 96) report elevated CgA in 130 of 184 patients; 99 of those 130 had a condition that could raise CgA, chiefly renal failure or proton-pump inhibitor treatment. The paper does not establish that all 99 had a false-positive result: it says the contribution of those conditions relative to tumor secretion remains uncertain. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]14. Marie I, Moutot A, Tharrasse A, et al. Validity of proton pump inhibitors' prescriptions in a department of internal medicine. Rev Med Interne 2007; 28: 86-93.
  2. [36]36. Bajetta E, Ferrari L, Martinetti A, et al. Chromogranin A, neuron specific enolase, carcinoembryonic antigen, and hydroxyindole acetic acid evaluation in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 1999; 86: 858-65. IJBM_2_2011.indb 101 7-06-2011 14:26:49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vezzosi, D., Walter, T., Laplanche, A., Raoul, J. L., Dromain, C., Ruszniewski, P., d'Herbomez, M., Guigay, J., Mitry, E., Cadiot, G., Leboulleux, S., Lombard-Bohas, C., Borson-Chazot, F., Ducreux, M., Baudin, E., & (GTE), F. T. G. D. D. T. E.
Affiliations
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Centre Eugène Marquis (FR)
  • Hôpital Beaujon (FR)
  • Laboratoire de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre de Biologie-Pathologie, CHRU, Lille - France
  • Hôpital Ambroise-Paré (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (FR)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Lyon - France
  • Fédération d'Endocrinologie Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron - France
  • Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif - France
Venue
The International Journal of Biological Markers
Published
2011-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
94-101
ISSN
  • 0393-6155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1724-6008
OpenAlex
W2032237900
Cited by
43
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Biological Markers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Institut Gustave-Roussy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Keywords
chromogranin A, false positives, metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, tumor progression markers, impaired kidney function, proton pump inhibitors, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, False Positive Reactions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Chromogranin A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review