CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Jewish Identity and SocietyRace, History, and American SocietyHannah Arendt's Political Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Should Blacks Think When Jews Choose Whiteness?

Gordon, Jane Anna·2015·Critical Philosophy of Race
DOI 10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.0227
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Revisiting James Baldwin's under-engaged contribution to heated debates over Black (Christian)-(white) Jewish relations in New York City in the late 1960s, “Blacks Are Anti-Semitic Because They Are Anti-White,” in what follows I explore the surprising ways in which two European Jewish women political theorists, Emma Goldman and Hannah Arendt, otherwise celebrated for their rigorous sobriety, enacted the very blindness that framed their Jewishness as a form of whiteness worthy of Baldwin's criticism. I close by considering the ways of envisioning being Jewish that we might build from Baldwin's reflections, ones that would, in enlarging the distance of Jewishness from whiteness, invite transformative brands of solidarity rather than specifically black forms of anti-Semitism. Ironically, this path would have entailed American Jews' becoming more fully themselves rather than indexing their advancement or flourishing through a white, Christian index. Put slightly differently, this essay turns backward to look forward, aiming to understand what I consider missed opportunities worth lamenting so we might proceed differently.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.0227

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Adams, Maurianne, and John Bracey. 1999. Strangers & Neighbors: Relations between Black and Jews in the United States. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  2. Goldman, Emma. 2002. “A Woman without a Country.” In Quiet Rumours: An Anarcha-Feminist Reader, edited by the Dark Star Collective. Edinburgh: AK Press.
  3. Gutman, Israel. 1971. “Youth Movements in the Underground and the Ghetto Revolts,” in Jewish Resistance During the Holocaust, edited by M. Grubsztein, 260–84 (Proceedings of the Conference on the Manifestation of Jewish Resistance, 1968) Jerusalem: Yad Vashem.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Related

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Jane Anna
Venue
Critical Philosophy of Race
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Published
2015-07-01
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
227-258
ISSN
  • 2165-8684 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-8692
DOI
10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.0227
OpenAlex
W2753011458
Semantic Scholar
39104052d44c6e6ebd1caab3c7af69d979a36ecb
Cited by
6
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Philosophy of Race (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Critical Philosophy of Race
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Jewish Identity and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Keywords
James Baldwin, Black-Jewish relations, whiteness, antisemitism, Emma Goldman, Hannah Arendt, Jewish identity, Black Christians, solidarity, New York City, 1960s

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review