THE CHIPPED STONE ASSEMBLAGE
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The percentage of glossed flint tools (sickle blades, geometric sickles and other glossed items) in the total number of tools seemingly increased in both Areas H and K at Megiddo.
“With all due caution (as a result of the relatively small assemblages in some of the relevant layers), increase in the percentage of these tools (in the total number of tools) can seemingly be observed in both Areas H and K (Table 4, based on ELLIS 2013 for Levels K-8, K-7 and K-6; ROSENBERG-YEFET in press for Area H and Levels K-10 and K-9).”
From Egyptian Imperial Economy in Canaan: Reaction to the Climate Crisis at the End of the Late Bronze Age (2017) · cites this paper as ELLIS 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Finkelstein, I., Langgut, D., Meiri, M., & Sapir-Hen, L. (2017) · Ägypten und Levante · doi:10.1553/aeundl27s249 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ellis, J.
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Julie
- Venue
- Megiddo V
- Publisher
- Penn State University Press
- Published
- 2013-06-04
- Pages
- 829-865
- OpenAlex
- W3212763438
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Penn State University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- chipped stone, lithic assemblages, lithic artifacts, lithic technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
