The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours
Open accessAbstract
With its rapid uptake among young people around the world, it is no surprise that TikTok is buzzing with cultures and practices of internet celebrity. Most notably, the platform is becoming more commercial and professionalized with the rise of TikTok Influencers, advertising networks, and agencies dedicated to monetizing content and embedding advertising on TikTok, and top TikTok Influencers raking in millions in income annually. However, little is known about the constitution of internet celebrity on TikTok yet, and existing models of internet celebrity on predecessor apps like Instagram and YouTube do not neatly apply to the distinctive terrain of TikTok. As such, this paper is an exploratory study into the makings of internet celebrity cultures on TikTok, focused on how attention economy and visibility labour practices have emerged as a result of the app’s features. With empirical data drawn from an extended period in-depth digital ethnography, and analyses and insights informed and supported by traditional anthropological participant observation and personal interviews with TikTok Influencers and agencies, this scoping paper offers a foundation for how celebrity, attention, and visibility are constituted across TikTok’s platform norms and features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Abidin (2020) argued that TikTok prioritizes post-based virality compared to persona-based virality.”
From Entrepreneurial Selves, Emotions, and Algorithmic Creativity Among Young Content Creators in the Philippines (2026) · cites this paper as Abidin 2020
In the citing paper
“As Abidin notes,”
From CRUISING TIKTOK: USING ALGORITHMIC FOLK KNOWLEDGE TO EVADE CISHETERONORMATIVE CONTENT MODERATION (2023) · cites this paper as Abidin 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
It's complicated: the social lives of networked teens
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-7042 · Cited by 1,607
The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms
Bucher, T. (2016) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1154086 · Cited by 1,420
Abidin, C. (2016) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x16665177 · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationThe walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816675438 · Cited by 1,165
The attention economy and the Net
Goldhaber, M. H. (1997) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v2i4.519 · Cited by 805
Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online
Abidin, C. (2018) · doi:10.1108/9781787560765 · Cited by 788
Self-citationSlominski, A., Wortsman, J., Luger, T., Paus, R., & Solomon, S. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.3.979 · Cited by 776
Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn
Turner, G. (2010) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446269565 · Cited by 562
Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip
Bishop, S. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819854731 · Cited by 535
Kaye, D. B. V., Chen, X., & Zeng, J. (2021) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/2050157920952120 · Cited by 500
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Abidin, C. 2015. Communicative <3 Intimacies: Influencers and Perceived Interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology, 8. DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2018.143 7204 · DOI
- Lobato, R. 2018. On discoverability. Flow Journal, 24(8).
- Matamoros-Fernández, A and Kaye, DBV. 2020. TikTok suicide video: it’s time platforms collaborated to limit disturbing content. The Conversation, 8 September [online access athttps://theconversation.com/ tiktok-suicide-video-its-time-platforms-collaborated-to-limit-disturbing-content-145756 last accessed 23 September 2020]. · DOI
- Neyaz, A, Kumar, A, Krishnan, S, Placker, J and Liu, Q. 2020. Security, privacy & steganographic analysis of Faceapp & TikTok. International Journal of Computer Science & Security, 14(2): 38–59.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Showing They Care (Or Don’t): Affective Publics and Ambivalent Climate Activism on TikTok
Hautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B., & Zeng, J. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211012344 · Cited by 351
Zeng, J., & Abidin, C. (2021) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1961007 · Cited by 305
Self-citationFrom content moderation to visibility moderation : A case study of platform governance on TikTok
Zeng, J., & Kaye, D. B. V. (2022) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.287 · Cited by 298
Trick and Please. A Mixed-Method Study On User Assumptions About the TikTok Algorithm
Klug, D., Qin, Y., Evans, M. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2021) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3447535.3462512 · Cited by 238
#GenZ on TikTok: the collective online self-Portrait of the social media generation
Stahl, C. C., & Literat, I. (2022) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2022.2053671 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Abidin, C.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Abidin, Crystal
- ORCID
- Abidin, Crystal
- Venue
- Cultural Science Journal
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-103
- ISSN
- 1836-0416 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123415290
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 23
- FWCI
- 21.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cultural Science Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Tencent
- Curtin University of Technology
- Australian Research Council (DE190100789)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- internet celebrities, TikTok, attention economy, TikTok influencers, influencer marketing, youth, digital labor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review