Cited by 45Species Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesResearch Data Management Practices

Empowering Citizens to Inform Decision-Making as a Way Forward to Support Invasive Alien Species Policy

Open access
Groom, Quentin, Strubbe, Diederik, Adriaens, Tim, Davis, Amy J. S., Desmet, Peter, Oldoni, Damiano, Reyserhove, Lien, Roy, Helen E. +1 more·2019·Citizen Science: Theory and Practice

Abstract

Observations reported by citizens are crucial to the ability of scientists to inform policy on biodiversity. This is particularly relevant in the case of preventing and controlling biological invasions; that is, the introduction and spread of species outside their natural ranges as a consequence of human activity. Such invasions of natural ecosystems represent one of the main threats to biodiversity, economy, and human well-being globally, and policies on tackling this issue require a strong evidence base that increasingly is built on citizen science. Many citizens are motivated to collect data for their own interest, while presumably, few expect to make a major impact on policy. The needs of policy-makers are not always aligned with the approaches used by citizens to collect and share data. Therefore, how can we motivate citizen science for the needs of policy without compromising the enjoyment that citizens gain from collecting biodiversity observations? How can policy-makers support citizens to collect the data they need? Solutions require two components, a combination of social and technological innovation. Initiatives aimed at supporting decision-making processes should involve more societal actors and be built in a more collaborative or even co-created manner with citizens, scientists, and policy-makers. Technological solutions can be achieved through regular, rapid, and open publication of biodiversity data products. We envisage frequent publication of maps and indicators from rapidly mobilized data, with clear pointers to gaps in knowledge. Improving the links between data collection and delivery of policy-relevant information demonstrates – to citizens and their organizations – the need for their data, and gives them a clear view on the impact of their data on policy. This visibility also empowers stakeholder organizations in the policy development process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/cstp.238

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Engaging volunteers in surveillance and monitoring is a low-cost, large-scale, and long-term option.

    “Engaging volunteers in surveillance and monitoring is a low‐cost, large‐scale, and long‐term option (Roy et al., 2015; Pocock et al., 2018; Groom et al., 2019).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Groom et al., 2019

    In “Citizen Science and Biological Invasions,” the paper says citizen observations enable surveillance at larger spatial extents and provide long time series and broad land coverage. It describes contributors as unpaid, but does not establish that volunteer surveillance and monitoring is a low-cost option overall. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Overcoming knowing-doing gaps, involving citizen science, and raising awareness are making important contributions towards developing effective, operational, and clear mechanisms for much greater public and political engagement with biological invasions.

    “Overcoming knowing–doing gaps (Hulme, 2014a ; Foxcroft et al., 2020), involving citizen science (Groom et al., 2019), and raising awareness are making important contributions towards developing effective, operational, and clear mechanisms for much greater public and, hence, political engagement with the many complex and interacting dimensions of biological invasions.”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Groom et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Adriaens, T, Groom, Q, Vanderhoeven, S, Davis, A, Strubbe, D, Reyserhove, L, Desmet, P, Oldoni, D and D'hondt, B. 2018. The importance of citizen sci- ence for research, policy and management on invasive alien species. Natuur.focus, 17(4): 185-193.
  2. Baghramian, M, Capaccioli, M, de Rijcke, S, Drotner, K, Dubertret, L, Irwin, A, Luty, T, Makarow, M, Moberg, C, Morega, AM and Owens, SE. 2019. Making sense of science for policy under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. Berlin: SAPEA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26356/MASOS · DOI
  3. Ferreira, MR, Proenca, JF and Proenca, T. 2009. Moti- vations and management factors of volunteer work in nonprofit organisations: a literature review. In 8th International Congress of the International Associa tion on Public and Nonprofit Marketing.
  4. Wittenberg, R and Cock, MJ. (eds.). 2001. Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and man- agement practices. Wallingford, the United King- dom: GISP/CAB International. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1079/9780851995694.0000 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groom, Q., Strubbe, D., Adriaens, T., Davis, A. J. S., Desmet, P., Oldoni, D., Reyserhove, L., Roy, H. E., & Vanderhoeven, S.
Affiliations
  • Meise Botanic Garden (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Research Institute for Nature and Forest (BE)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
Corresponding author
Groom, Quentin
Venue
Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Published
2019
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2057-4991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993747735
Cited by
45
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Citizen Science Theory and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Citizen Science: Theory and Practice (Citizen Science Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BR/165/A1/TrIAS)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/R016429/1, NE/R016429, R016429/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
invasive species, citizen science, biodiversity policy, biological invasions, co-creation, biodiversity indicators, data sharing, stakeholder engagement, science-policy interface, biodiversity observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review