Cited by 81Health Policy Implementation SciencePrimary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Development and implementation of an integrated chronic disease model in South Africa: lessons in the management of change through improving the quality of clinical practice

Open access
Mahomed, Ozayr, Asmall, Shaidah·2015·International Journal of Integrated Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: South Africa is facing a complex burden of disease arising from a combination of chronic infectious illness and non-communicable diseases. As the burden of chronic diseases (communicable and non-communicable) increases, providing affordable and effective care to the increasing numbers of chronic patients will be an immense challenge. METHODS: The framework recommended by the Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom for the development and evaluation of complex health interventions was used to conceptualise the intervention. The breakthrough series was utilised for the implementation process. These two frameworks were embedded within the clinical practice improvement model that served as the overarching framework for the development and implementation of the model. RESULTS: The Chronic Care Model was ideally suited to improve the facility component and patient experience; however, the deficiencies in other aspects of the health system building blocks necessitated a hybrid model. An integrated chronic disease management model using a health systems approach was initiated across 42 primary health care facilities. The interventions were implemented in a phased approach using learning sessions and action periods to introduce the planned and targeted changes. CONCLUSION: The implementation of the integrated chronic disease management model is feasible at primary care in South Africa provided that systemic challenges and change management are addressed during the implementation process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/ijic.1454

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]National Treasury Budget Review 2014. Report 2014 Pretoria National Treasury
  2. [5]Kautzy K Tollman S Barron P Rona-Readon J A perspective on primary healthcare in South Africa South African health review 2008 2008 Durban Health System Trust Available from: http://www.hst.org.za/uploads/files/chap2_08.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahomed, O., & Asmall, S.
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • Department of Health (ZA)
Corresponding author
Asmall, Shaidah
Venue
International Journal of Integrated Care
Published
2015-10-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
e038-e038
ISSN
1568-4156 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168130980
Cited by
81
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7
FWCI
13.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Integrated Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fogarty International Center (R24TW008863)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
Chronic Care Model, chronic disease management, primary care, health system building blocks, clinical practice improvement, change management, patient experience, non-communicable diseases, chronic infectious diseases, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review