The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
What is the “Source” of Open Source Hardware?
Open accessAbstract
What “open source” means once applied to tangible products has been so far mostly addressed through the light of licensing. While this approach is suitable for software, it appears to be over-simplistic for complex hardware products. Whether such a product can be labelled as open source is not only a question of licence but a question of documentation, i.e. what is the information that sufficiently describes it? Or in other words, what is the “source” of open source hardware? To date there is no simple answer to this question, leaving large room for interpretation in the usage of the term. Based on analysis of public documentation of 132 products, this paper provides an overview of how practitioners tend to interpret the concept of open source hardware. It specifically focuses on the recent evolution of the open source movement outside the domain of electronics and DIY to that of non-electronic and complex open source hardware products. The empirical results strongly indicate the existence of two main usages of open source principles in the context of tangible products: publication of product-related documentation as a means to support community-based product development and to disseminate privately developed innovations. It also underlines the high variety of interpretations and even misuses of the concept of open source hardware. This reveals in turn that this concept may not even be clear to practitioners and calls for more narrowed down definitions of what has to be shared for a product to be called open source. This article contributes towards this effort through the definition of an open source hardware lifecycle summarizing the observed approaches to open source hardware.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 68
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Aitamurto, 2015, “The Open Paradigm in Design Research.”, Design Issues, 31, 17, 10.1162/DESI_a_00348 · DOI
- Aksulu, 2010, “A Comprehensive Review and Synthesis of Open Source Research.”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 576, 10.17705/1jais.00245 · DOI
- Balka, 2011, Open Source Product Development – The Meaning an Relevance of Openness, 10.1007/978-3-8349-6949-1 · DOI
- BalkaK RaaschC HerstattC “Open Source Enters the World of Atoms: A Statistical Analysis of Open Design.”First Monday2009141110.5210/fm.v14i11.2670http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2670 · DOI
- Balka, 2014, “The Effect of Selective Openness on Value Creation in User Innovation Communities.”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 392, 10.1111/jpim.12102 · DOI
- Bonvoisin, 2017, Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2017, 77, 10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_8 · DOI
- Camarinha-Matos, 2009, “Collaborative Networked Organizations – Concepts and Practice in Manufacturing Enterprises.”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 46, 10.1016/j.cie.2008.11.024 · DOI
- Choi, 2010, “A Survey of Binary Similarity and Distance Measures.”, Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 8, 43
- Ehls, 2015, Open Source Innovation The Phenomenon, Participant’s Behaviour, Business Implications, 63
- Gacek, 2004, “The Many Meanings of Open Source.”, IEEE Software, 21, 34, 10.1109/MS.2004.1259206 · DOI
- Gibb, 2014, Building Open Source Hardware: DIY Manufacturing for Hackers and Makers
- HansenA HowardTJ ChakrabartiA PrakashRV “The Current State of Open Source Hardware: The Need for an Open Source Development Platform.”ICoRD’132013Springer India97788Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_77 · DOI
- Hatch, 2013, The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers
- Howison, 2014, “Collaboration Through Open Superposition: A Theory of the Open Source Way.”, Mis Quarterly, 38, 29, 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.02 · DOI · Paper page
- Huizingh, 2011, “Open Innovation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.”, Technovation, 31, 2, 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002 · DOI
- Katz, 2012, “Towards a Functional Licence for Open Hardware.”, International Free and Open Source Software Law Review, 4, 41, 10.5033/ifosslr.v4i1.69 · DOI
- KyriakouH NickersonJV SabnisG “Knowledge Reuse for Customization: Metamodels in an Open Design Community for 3D Printing.”2017Rochester, NYSocial Science Research NetworkSSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2924083, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2924083 · DOI
- Lee, 2003, “From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development.”, Organization Science, 14, 633, 10.1287/orsc.14.6.633.24866 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2017, “WHY OPEN SOURCE? EXPLORING THE MOTIVATIONS OF USING AN OPEN MODEL FOR HARDWARE DEVELOPMENT.”, 10.1115/DETC2017-68195 · DOI
- Maher, 2011, Design Computing and Cognition ’10, 581, 10.1007/978-94-007-0510-4_31 · DOI
- Maher, 1995, “Formalising Design Exploration As Co-Evolution: A Combined Gene Approach.”, Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD, 3
- Moritz, 2015, “Open up or Close down-The New Era of ‘Openneers’ and How They Lead the Way to Future Success.”, Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 13, 15
- Paulini, 2011, “Understanding Collective Design Communication in Open Innovation Communities.”, Journal of CoCreation in Design and Arts
- Pearce, 2017, “Emerging Business Models for Open Source Hardware.”, Journal of Open Hardware, 1, 10.5334/joh.4 · DOI
- Raasch, 2011, “Product Development in Open Design Communities: A Process Perspective.”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 08, 557, 10.1142/S021987701100260X · DOI
- Raasch, 2009, “On the Open Design of Tangible Goods.”, R&D Management, 39, 382, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00567.x · DOI
- Tibshirani, 2001, “Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set via the Gap Statistic.”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63, 411, 10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · DOI · Paper page
- Ulrich, 2011, Product Design and Development
- Voigt, 2016, Internet Science, 189, 10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_17 · DOI
- von Hippel, 2005, Democratizing Innovation, 10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- von Hippel, 2010, “Comment on ‘Is Open Innovation a Field of Study or a Communication Barrier to Theory Development?’”, Technovation, 30, 555, 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.09.003 · DOI
- Wang, 2012, “The Retrieval of Structured Design Rationale for the Re-Use of Design Knowledge with an Integrated Representation.”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26, 251, 10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.003 · DOI
- West, 2008, “Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation.”, Industry and Innovation, 15, 223, 10.1080/13662710802033734 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonvoisin, J., Mies, R., Boujut, J.-F., & Stark, R.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Institute for Production Systems and Design Technology (DE)
- Laboratoire des Sciences pour la Conception, l'Optimisation et la Production (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Open Hardware
- Published
- 2017-09-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 2514-1708 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753231507
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Open Hardware (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DepositOnce (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Technische Universität Berlin – Universitätsbibliothek (cc-by)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE26-0012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
- Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
- Keywords
- open-source hardware, product documentation, innovation dissemination, tangible products, DIY
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
