Cited by 32Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesAncient Near East HistoryBiblical Studies and Interpretation

Between Archaeology and Text: The Origins of Rice Consumption and Cultivation in the Middle East and the Mediterranean

Open access
Sureshkumar Muthukumaran, Sureshkumar Muthukumaran·2022·PIA

Abstract

Asiatic Rice Oryza sativa L. (Poaceae) is a domesticated grain crop native to the tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, which presently ranks among the most important grains in a global diet. Oryza sativa is comprised of two distinct phylogenetic subspecies, namely japonica and indica, for which genetic evidence indicates at least two centres of domestication: the Lower Yangtze valley for the broad thick-grained japonica (c. 4000 BC) and the Gangetic basin for the thin elongated indica variety (c. 2500 BC) (Fuller et al 2010; idem 2011; Nesbitt et al 2010: 325–7). Modern genetics of landraces from northeast India may indicate a third distinct origin for the so-called aus rice varieties (Londo et al 2006: 9581–2). The genetic history of this taxon is further complicated by post-domestication hybridisation between domesticates and their wild ancestors as well as the presence of rarer forms like the aromatic rice varieties (basmati in South Asia and sadri from Iran) which may be of independent origin (Nesbitt et al 2010: 324–5). In South Asia domesticated rice is attested at various archaeological sites in the Ganges basin from the mid-3rd millennium BC onwards. It subsequently appears at mature and late Harappan levels in north-western India (c. 2000 BC) before arriving at the edge of the eastern Iranian plateau at Pirak on the north Kachi plain in the early 2nd millennium BC (Costantini 1981; Fuller 2006: 36; Sato 2005). The presence of rice at Pirak heralds its gradual westward movement along the Iranian plateau via overland and perhaps even coastal routes into western Iran and Mesopotamia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/pia.465

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Middle Assyrian texts confirm that irrigated rice became established in Syria by ∼1100 BCE.

    “Middle Assyrian texts also confirm that irrigated rice became established in Syria by ∼1100 BCE”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [112]

    Section III (page not available) describes a Middle Assyrian tablet from Kaḫat in modern Syria, dated c. 1100 BCE, that asks whether rice is available and separately requests irrigation of fields. It does not establish that those fields grew rice or that irrigated rice cultivation was established in Syria by that date; its statement that rice cultivation was well-established concerns later evidence from northern Iraq. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • References to irrigated rice in Syria increased from the eighth century BCE.

    “references to this practice increased from the eighth century BCE (112).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [112]

    Section III (page not provided) says later references to rice occur in Neo-Assyrian archives of the eighth and seventh centuries BCE and describe cultivation in a heavily irrigated region. That region is identified as northern Iraq, not Syria; the paper does not say references to irrigated rice in Syria increased from the eighth century BCE. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Costantini, L. 1981 Paleoethnobotany at Pirak In Hartel, H. (ed.) South Asian Archaeology. Berlin: Reimer, 271-8.
  2. Daressy, G. 1922 'Le Riz dans l'Egypte Antique'. Bulletin de l'Institut d'Egypte 4, 35-7.
  3. Jursa, M. 1999/2000 'Review of D. T. Potts, Mesopotamian Civilization: The Material Foundations'. Archiv für Orientforschung Bd. 46/47, 290-5.
  4. Salvini, M. 1998 'I Testi Cuneiformi delle Campagne 1989 e 1993 a Tell Barri/ Kaḫat'. In Pecorella, P.E. (ed.) Tell Barri/ Kaḫat II. Rome: CNR, Istituto per gli Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici, 187-98. Muthukumaran: Between Archaeology and Text Art. 14, page 7 of 7
  5. Sato, Y. I. 2005 'Rice and Indus Civilization'. In Osada, T. (ed.) Linguistics, Archaeology and Human Past. Kyoto: Research Insti- tute for Humanity and Nature, 213-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muthukumaran, S., & Muthukumaran, S.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sureshkumar Muthukumaran
Venue
PIA
Publisher
UCL Press
Published
2022-12-19
ISSN
  • 0965-9315 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-9015
OpenAlex
W2074008304
Cited by
32
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Papers from the Institute of Archaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
rice domestication, rice, rice cultivation, Middle East, Mediterranean, ancient Near East, Indus Valley civilization, Ganges basin, Iranian Plateau, Mesopotamia, crop dispersal, archaeobotany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review