Cited by 26Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersMotor Control and AdaptationBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digitizing Tablet and Fahn–Tolosa–Marı´n Ratings of Archimedes Spirals have Comparable Minimum Detectable Change in Essential Tremor

Open access
Elble, Rodger J, Ellenbogen, Aaron·2017·Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements

Abstract

Background: Drawing Archimedes spirals is a popular and valid method of assessing action tremor in the upper limbs. We performed the first blinded comparison of Fahn–Tolosa–Marý´n (FTM) ratings and tablet measures of essential tremor to determine if a digitizing tablet is better than 0–4 ratings in detecting changes in essential tremor that exceed random variability in tremor amplitude. Methods: The large and small spirals of FTM were drawn with each hand on two consecutive days by 14 men and four women (age 60¡8.7 years [mean¡SD]) with mild to severe essential tremor. The drawings were simultaneously digitized with a digitizing tablet. Tremor in each digitized drawing was computed with spectral analysis in an independent laboratory, blinded to the clinical ratings. The mean peak-to-peak tremor displacement (cm) in the four spirals and mean FTM ratings were compared statistically. Results: Test–retest intraclass correlations (ICCs) (two-way random single measures, absolute agreement) were excellent for the FTM ratings (ICC 0.90, 95% CI 0.76–0.96) and tablet (ICC 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–0.99). Log10 tremor amplitude (T) and FTM were strongly correlated (logT=αFTM + β, α≈0.6, β≈–1.27, r=0.94). The minimum detectable change for the tablet and FTM were 51% and 67% of the initial assessment. Discussion: Digitizing tablets are much more precise than clinical ratings, but this advantage is mitigated by the natural variability in tremor. Nevertheless, the digitizing tablet is a robust method of quantifying tremor that can be used in lieu of or in combination with clinical ratings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/tohm.344

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elble, R. J., & Ellenbogen, A.
Affiliations
  • SIU Medicine (US)
  • Michigan Institute for Neurological Disorders (US)
Corresponding author
Elble, Rodger J
Venue
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements
Published
2017-07-07
Volume
7
Issue
0
Pages
481
ISSN
2160-8288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4241930734
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
essential tremor, digitizing tablet, tremor amplitude, minimal detectable change, test-retest reliability, tremor quantification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review