Cited by 18Marine and fisheries researchReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

An indeterminate model to estimate egg production of the highly iteroparous and fecund fish, dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus)

Abstract

Dolphinfish, Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758, reproductive biology is well known, but this study, which examined gonad histology, substantially increases estimates of dolphinfish spawning fraction and annual egg production. Ovaries were collected from 621 females in three Florida regions: the Keys, Cape Canaveral, and the Panhandle. Maturation and spawning were evident in all three regions. Median size at maturity, 419 mm fork length (FL; 16.5 in, ?3 mo), was not regionally specific around Florida. Recruitment of primary oocytes to vitellogenesis occurred asynchronously throughout the spawning season, and mature oocytes developed group-synchronously as batches. Thus, an indeterminate method was required to estimate egg production. Once mature, females spawned 70-180 d yr-1. Some females spawned in all months of the year, but spawning fraction was highest in winter and spring. Batch fecundity (BF) ranged from 20,000 to 620,000 eggs and was significantly related to FL: BF = 0.000005 × FL3.62. An egg production model estimated a range from 15 to 174 million eggs yr-1, two orders of magnitude higher than the previous estimate (0.24-3.0 million eggs yr-1) in the Florida Straits. This new, higher estimate arises because our large sample size of gonad histology permitted estimation of spawning fraction throughout the year. Spawning early and often should make C. hippurus resilient to overfishing, but other data gaps�particularly regarding bycatch mortality�confound our ability to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5343/bms.2011.1096

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such relatively small differences in reproductive parameters may not be biologically significant, especially for lionfish that mature early.

    “Regardless, such relatively small differences may not be biologically significant, especially for lionfish that mature early (McBride et al., 2012).”

    From Reproductive biology of invasive lionfish (Pterois spp.) (2015) · cites this paper as McBride et al., 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McBride, R. S., Snodgrass, D. J., Adams, D. H., Rider, S. J., & Colvocoresses, J. A.
Venue
Bulletin of Marine Science
Published
2012-04-01
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
283-303
ISSN
0007-4977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981028497
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bulletin of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Marine Fisheries Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
dolphinfish, Coryphaena hippurus, egg production, batch fecundity, size at maturity, vitellogenesis, oocyte maturation, spawning seasonality, iteroparity, fisheries management, Florida Straits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review