The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Review of Reef Restoration and Coral Propagation Using the Threatened Genus Acropora in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic
Abstract
Coral reef restoration has gained recent popularity in response to the steady decline of corals and the recognition that coral reefs may not be able to recover naturally without human intervention. To synthesize collective knowledge about reef restoration focused particularly on the threatened genus Acropora in the Caribbean and western Atlantic, we conducted a literature review combined with personal communications with restoration practitioners and an online questionnaire to identify the most effective reef restoration methods and the major obstacles hindering restoration success. Most participants (90%) strongly believe that Acropora populations are severely degraded, continue to decline, and may not recover without human intervention. Low-cost methods such as coral gardening and fragment stabilization were ranked as the most effective restoration activities for this genus. High financial costs, the small footprint of restoration activities, and the potential damage to wild populations were identified as major concerns, while increased public awareness and education were ranked as the highest benefits of coral reef restoration. This study highlights the advantages and outlines the concerns associated with coral reef restoration and creates a unique synthesis of coral restoration activities as a complementary management tool to help guide best-practices for future restoration efforts throughout the region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Building coral reef resilience through assisted evolution
van Oppen, M. J. H., Oliver, J. K., Putnam, H. M., & Gates, R. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1422301112 · Cited by 991
Beneficial Microorganisms for Corals (BMC): Proposed Mechanisms for Coral Health and Resilience
Peixoto, R. S., Rosado, P. M., Leite, D. C. D. A., Rosado, A. S., & Bourne, D. G. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00341 · Cited by 594
Marine probiotics: increasing coral resistance to bleaching through microbiome manipulation
Rosado, P. M., Leite, D. C. A., Duarte, G. A. S., Chaloub, R. M., Jospin, G., Nunes da Rocha, U., Saraiva, J. P., Dini-Andreote, F., Eisen, J. A., Bourne, D. G., et al. (2019) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0323-6 · Cited by 459
Baums, I. B., Baker, A. C., Davies, S. W., Grottoli, A. G., Kenkel, C. D., Kitchen, S. A., Kuffner, I. B., LaJeunesse, T. C., Matz, M. V., Miller, M. W., et al. (2019) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1978 · Cited by 284
Acropora Cervicornis Data Coordination Hub, an Open Access Database for Evaluating Genet Performance
Kiel, P. M., Formel, N., Jankulak, M., Baker, A. C., Cunning, R., Gilliam, D. S., Kenkel, C. D., Langdon, C., Lirman, D., Lustic, C., et al. (2023) · Bulletin of Marine Science · doi:10.5343/bms.2022.0064 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, C., Schopmeyer, S., & Lirman, D.
- Venue
- Bulletin of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Bulletin of Marine Science
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1075-1098
- ISSN
- 0007-4977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057524613
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Reef Restoration and Coral Propagation Using the Threatened Genus Acropora in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5343/bms.2011.1143
- The paper
- Young, C., Schopmeyer, S., & Lirman, D. (2012). A Review of Reef Restoration and Coral Propagation Using the Threatened Genus Acropora in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2011.1143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.