Cited by 3Coral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesMarine Biology and Ecology Research

Acropora Cervicornis Data Coordination Hub, an Open Access Database for Evaluating Genet Performance

Open access
Kiel, Patrick M, Formel, Nathan, Jankulak, Mike, Baker, Andrew C, Cunning, Ross, Gilliam, David S, Kenkel, Carly D, Langdon, Chris +9 more·2023·Bulletin of Marine Science

Abstract

Once one of the predominant reef-building corals in the region,Acropora cervicornis is now a focal species of coral restoration efforts in Florida and the western Caribbean. Scientists and restoration practitioners have been independently collecting phenotypic data on genets of A. cervicornis grown in restoration nurseries. While these data are important for understanding the intraspecific response to varying environmental conditions, and thus the potential genetic contribution to phenotypic variation, in isolation these observations are of limited use for large-scale, multi- institution restoration efforts that are becoming increasingly necessary. Here, we present the Acropora cervicornis Data Coordination Hub, a web-accessible relational database to align disparate datasets to compare genet-specific performance. In this data descriptor, we release data for 248 genets evaluated across 38 separate traits. We present a framework to align datasets with the ultimate goal of facilitating informed, data-driven restoration throughout the Caribbean.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5343/bms.2022.0064

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ecol Appl, 29, 1
  2. Local conditions magnify coral loss after marine heatwaves. Science, 372, 977
  3. Mixtures of genotypes increase disease resistance in a coral nursery. Sci Rep, 12, 19286

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kiel, P. M., Formel, N., Jankulak, M., Baker, A. C., Cunning, R., Gilliam, D. S., Kenkel, C. D., Langdon, C., Lirman, D., Lustic, C., Maxwell, K., Moulding, A. L., Moura, A., Muller, E. M., Schopmeyer, S., Winters, R. S., & Enochs, I. C.
Affiliations
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Shedd Aquarium (US)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • Coral Restoration Foundation (US)
  • Mote Marine Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kiel, Patrick M
Venue
Bulletin of Marine Science
Published
2023-04-01
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
119-136
ISSN
0007-4977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360973651
Cited by
3
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Bulletin of Marine Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • Coral Reef Conservation Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
Acropora cervicornis, coral reef restoration, phenotypic traits, coral nurseries, relational databases, data coordination, intraspecific genetic variation, reef-building corals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review