The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Total Phenol Analysis: Automation and Comparison with Manual Methods
Abstract
A fully automated-continuous flow 40-sample/ hour procedure was adapted from the Singleton-Rossi method of analysis for total phenols in wine and other plant extracts. It was compared with small-volume manual and semiautomated versions of this analysis. The agreement in mg of gallic acid equivalent phenol (GAE) per liter among a series of dry wines was excellent by all three procedures. The coefficients of variation in replicate analyses averaged 5.8% for the manual, 6.2% for the semi-automated and 2.2% for the automated procedure. This greater reproducibility, plus savings of about 70% in labor and up to 40% in reagents, makes the automated procedure attractive for laboratories doing enough total phenol analyses to recoup the cost of the automating equipment. For continuous flow, color development with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent in alkaline solution must be hastened by heating compared to slower room temperature development for the manual methods. Heating of sugar-containing samples in the alkaline solution gives interference presumably from endiol formation. Examples are given of corrections which were used successfully to estimate the true phenol content of sweet wines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99017-1 · Cited by 19,125
Self-citationBiological activities and chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia
Küçük, M., Kolaylı, S., Karaoğlu, Ş., Ulusoy, E., Baltacı, C., & Candan, F. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.10.010 · Cited by 547
Alvarez-Suarez, J. M., Giampieri, F., Tulipani, S., Casoli, T., Di Stefano, G., González-Paramás, A. M., Santos-Buelga, C., Busco, F., Quiles, J. L., Cordero, M. D., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.11.002 · Cited by 370
(2009) · PubMed · Cited by 325
The antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of black pepper (Piper nigrum) seeds
Gülçin, İ. (2005) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480500450248 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Slinkard, K., & Singleton, V. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
- Publisher
- American Society for Enology and Viticulture
- Published
- 1977-01-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-55
- ISSN
- 0002-9254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4365388753
- Cited by
- 4,350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total Phenol Analysis: Automation and Comparison with Manual Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5344/ajev.1974.28.1.49
- The paper
- Slinkard, K., & Singleton, V. L. (1977). Total Phenol Analysis: Automation and Comparison with Manual Methods. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1974.28.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.