Cited by 4Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

A Multi-modal Deep Learning Approach for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Complications: Early Warning System Design and Implementation

Xiong, Ke, Cao, Guanghe, Jin, Meizhizi, Ye, Biao·2024·World Journal of Innovation and Modern Technology

Abstract

This paper presents a novel multi-modal deep learning framework for early prediction of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) complications through an advanced early warning system. The proposed architecture integrates multiple data modalities including clinical measurements, laboratory results, and temporal patient data through a sophisticated attention-based fusion mechanism. The system implements specialized preprocessing techniques for different data modalities and employs an innovative feature extraction pipeline for comprehensive risk assessment. Experimental validation was conducted on a dataset comprising 15,847 patients collected over five years from multiple medical centres. The framework achieved 94.7% prediction accuracy with a 72-hour warning window, demonstrating superior performance compared to existing approaches. The implementation of adaptive threshold mechanisms reduced false positive rates to 4.8% while maintaining 93.8% sensitivity and 95.2% specificity. The system's effectiveness was validated through prospective testing on an independent cohort of 3,245 patients, showing robust performance across diverse patient populations. The attention-based fusion mechanism demonstrated a 15% improvement in prediction accuracy compared to conventional approaches. This research contributes to the advancement of medical artificial intelligence through interpretable deep learning models, providing healthcare practitioners with insights into the decision-making process while maintaining high prediction accuracy for early intervention in T2D complications management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53469/wjimt.2024.07(06).15

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiong, K., Cao, G., Jin, M., & Ye, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
World Journal of Innovation and Modern Technology
Published
2024-12-02
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
120-132
ISSN
2572-2972 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406103926
Cited by
3
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of improved oil and gas recovery technology. (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes complications, early warning systems, multimodal deep learning, attention fusion, clinical data, laboratory findings, risk prediction, adaptive threshold, explainable deep learning, early intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review