The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chelonian Conservation and Biology
Open accessAbstract
Over a 15-yr period (2008-2022), 7802 cold-stunned sea turtles were found stranded in Massachusetts, of which 5028 (64%) were found alive. Annual stranding numbers increased over time. Species composition included 87% Kemp's ridley turtles (Lepidochelys kempii, of which 64% were alive), 8.2% loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta, of which 68% were alive), 4.5% green turtles (Chelonia mydas, of which 67% were alive), 0.3% undetermined species (of which 46% were alive), and 1 deceased hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). Live turtles were medically stabilized at a primary care facility, after which most turtles (70%) were transferred to secondary care facilities for further care, while others remained at the primary care facility to complete rehabilitation. Overall, 76% of turtles admitted alive were released to the wild after rehabilitation, generally within 3 to 8 mo of stranding, including 75% of Kemp's ridley turtles, 86% of loggerhead turtles, and 78% of green turtles. Most deaths for all species occurred at the primary care facility within the first 4 days of hospitalization. After stabilization and transfer to secondary facilities, 91% of Kemp's ridleys, 97% of loggerheads, and 96% of green turtles were later released. Medical management protocols were adjusted over time because of the increasing caseload and the COVID-19 pandemic, yet success rates remained high. This study indicates that rescue and rehabilitation of cold-stunned turtles in Massachusetts results in a high rate of release to the wild, and that management protocols can be thoughtfully refined to retain high success rates despite increasing caseload and operational restrictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Conservation Status of Turtles and Tortoises (Order Testudines)
Rhodin, A. G. J., Stanford, C. B., Dijk, P. P. V., Eisemberg, C., Luiselli, L., Mittermeier, R. A., Hudson, R., Horne, B. D., Goode, E. V., Kuchling, G., et al. (2018) · Chelonian Conservation and Biology · doi:10.2744/ccb-1348.1 · Cited by 265
Erb, V., Lolavar, A., & Wyneken, J. (2018) · Chelonian Conservation and Biology · doi:10.2744/ccb-1301.1 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Publisher
- Green Publication
- Published
- 2024-03-19
- OpenAlex
- W4392959336
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chelonian Conservation and Biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.53555/ccb.v19i01
- The paper
- Chelonian Conservation and Biology. (2024). https://doi.org/10.53555/ccb.v19i01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.