From the Brickfields of Egypt
Open accessAbstract
In early Hebrew tradition, one of the most evocative and familiar topoi for us modems-heard in childhood and studied later-is that of the hapless Hebrew slaves toiling in the brickfields of the Egyptian East Delta under the lash of Pharaoh's taskmasters (Ex.1: 11-14; 5: Sff. ).Much is made of the date, the route, the historical and theological significance of the oppression and exodus (and rightly so), but little more than a glance is usually spared for details of those toils preceding the exodus that were so painfully etched in the Hebrews' memories.The subject is hardly a burning issue, but is perhaps not unworthy of some modest attention based on first-hand material either quite new or long available but much neglected.First, I outline textual references to brick-production in pharaonic Egypt; the vast archaeological material lies beyond the needfully limited purview of this paper.• From the Old Kingdom ('Pyramid Age', third millennium BC) comes the earliest body of original papyrus documents.These are fragments of the meticulously-compiled accounts from the pyramid-temple of king Neferirkare at Abusir, a little north-west of ancient Memphis. 2 Besides the neatlyruled tables of daily and monthly duties of priests and temple 1 Egyptian building modes in general, cf. S. Clarke and R. Engelbach, Ancient Egyptian Masonry: the Building Oaft, London (1930).The basic physical evidence on nature, types and uses of brick in ancient Egypt has been dealt with by A. J. Spencer in his doctoral thesis at LiverpooL 2 The Abusir papyri, divided among several museums.Introduction, photos and hieroglyphic transcriptions are published in Mme.P. Posener-Kr~ger and J.-L. de Cenival, Hieratic Papyri in the British Museum, 5th Series, British Museum, London (1968); translation and commentary, forthcoming_ These accounts date from the reigns of Isesi to
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Kitchen surveys Egyptian textual records of mud-brick production from the Old Kingdom through the Ramesside period and argues that their administrative details — quotas, two-tier oversight, foremen, straw supply, and rest days — closely parallel the brickmaking servitude described in Exodus 1 and 5. The paper is a comparative philological note rather than a new excavation report, and it explicitly confines itself to textual evidence.
Key findings
- The Louvre Leather Roll (Year 5 of Ramesses II) lists 22 "stablemasters" (40 men in total) each with a production target of "2000 bricks," implying a total target of 80,000 bricks; the fullest entry reads "Yupa son of Urhiya, (target) 2000 bricks: 660 arrived, 410 arrived, 560 arrived. Total, 1630; deficit, 370." Elsewhere the roll records 12,390 bricks for Days 2–6 and 15,200 for Days 9–14 (grand total 27,590), and a separate heading of 22,890 bricks; deliveries in cols. II–IV:2 total 25,505, and these figures "cannot be correlated at present."
- Middle Kingdom accounts show comparable quota accounting: Papyrus Reisner I records "completed for him in brick – 39,118 (bricks) by 602 (enrolled labourers)," yielding roughly 65 bricks per man as a daily stint; Reisner III lists gangs of 6 to 18 men (occasionally up to 22) under named foremen, and "serfs making bricks" at usually 20 men per day. Later 12th Dynasty fragments total 116,511 bricks (23,603 of 5 palms, 92,908 of 6 palms), and an official Intef recorded 35,300 bricks for "the Walls of Ammenemes" in Nubia.
- Kitchen argues the two-tier oversight of the Hebrews (Pharaoh's *nogesim* over Hebrew *soterim*) matches Egyptian practice: the Deir el-Medina workmen's twin gangs were led by foremen chosen from their own number and answerable to the vizier, and the Reisner papyri show gangs of 6–18 men per foreman. He suggests the *nogesim* "would most likely have been just such junior officers/officials as the stablemasters of the Louvre Leather Roll," and that the Hebrews may have worked in gangs of about ten.
- Egyptian sensitivity to quotas and time off matches Exodus 5: Papyrus Anastasi III refers to men "making their quota of bricks daily," and in the Louvre Leather Roll no brick deliveries were made on Days 1, 7 and 8 of the 1st month of Shomu — possibly rest days or festivals (1st Shomu, Day 1 was the feast of Renenutet). Kitchen also notes the Rekhmire tomb scene (c. 1450 BC) showing a mixed workforce of Syrians, Nubians and Egyptians moulding bricks, with nine or ten men per armed overseer.
Methods
- A comparative textual/philological study: the author catalogues Egyptian written sources on brick production — the Abusir papyri (Old Kingdom), the Reisner papyri and Kahun/Gurob dynasty accounts (Middle Kingdom), the Rekhmire tomb scene, the Anastasi papyri, Deir el-Medina ostraca, and the Louvre Leather Roll — and sets them against Exodus 1:11–14 and 5:5ff.
- The Louvre Leather Roll analysis rests on the author's own "new and revised hieroglyphic transcription" of the document (published by Virey in 1893), which he states improves on Virey's transcription.
- Correlation is organised under three rubrics: levels of authority, control of work, and miscellaneous points (mortar, straw, terminology, and what the Hebrews were building — Pithom and Ra'amses/Pi-Ramesse).
Limitations
- Stated: the "vast archaeological material lies beyond the needfully limited purview of this paper"; from the shattered Abusir brick account "not too much can be drawn"; the arithmetical obscurities of the Louvre Leather Roll mean its accounts "cannot be correlated at present"; the period over which the 80,000-brick target was to be met is unknown (Virey suggested a month); and what festivals fell on Days 7 and 8 is "as yet unknown."
- Evident from the text: the argument for Hebrew–Egyptian correspondence is analogical rather than documentary — no Egyptian source names the Hebrews, and Kitchen's own phrasing is hedged ("would most likely have been," "may likewise have been organised"). The proposed gang size of about ten for the Hebrews is inference from Egyptian parallels, not evidence.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 5 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
Papyrus Reisner I, section K contains detailed specifications for loosening brick-clay, removing water from the field, and work completed in brick-clay of the fields, all completed in large-size brick.
“In Papyrus Reisner I, section K, occur detailed specifications for 'loosening brick-clay', 'removing(?) water from the field', and of work 'completed in brick-clay of the fields', all 'completed for him in large-size brick'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In the Louvre Leather Roll columns VIII and IX, no brick-deliveries were made on Days 1, 7 and 8 of the 1st month of Shomu.
“In the Louvre Leather Roll cols.VIII and IX, no brick-deliveries were made on Days 1, 7 and 8 of the 1st month of Shomu.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Middle Kingdom records present detailed notices of several hundreds of workmen grouped in small gangs generally of 6 to 18 men, occasionally up to 22 or down to one, each gang under a named foreman or crew-leader.
“They present detailed notices of several hundreds of workmen grouped in small gangs generally of 6 to 18 men (occasionally up to 22 men or down to one), each gang being under a named foreman or crew-leader (two terms used).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The Middle Kingdom records include calculations of man-days worked and payment in trsst-loaves, eight per man per day, sometimes seven and a fraction.
“These records include calculations of 'man-days' worked and payment in terms of trsst-loaves (eight per man per day, sometimes seven and a fraction).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Exodus 5 shows a two-tier administration between Pharaoh and the Hebrew labourers: Pharaoh's taskmasters chose some Hebrews as foremen over their fellows.
“We see also a two-tier administration between Pharaoh and the Hebrew labourers.General oversight fell to Pharaoh's 'taskmasters' (here, nogdim) who chose some of the Hebrews as 'foremen' (soterim) over their fellows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exodus 5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premiseown data
In Egyptian agriculture, land belonging to an institution is cultivated under the authority of a high official and by the hand or agency of a lesser person, with actual farming done by this person or by farm-labourers under him.
“In agriculture, land belonging to an institution is cultivated (i) r-lzt 'under the authority' of a high official, and (ii) m-grt 'by the hand/agency or some lesser person, the actual farming work being done by this person or by farm-labourers under him.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Hebrews may likewise have been organised in gangs of 10 or so men under their foremen.
“And the Hebrews may likewise have been organised in gangs of 1 0 or so men under their foremen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
- Interpretationreasoning
The nogesim of Exodus 5 would most likely have been just such junior officers or officials as the stablemasters of the Louvre Leather Roll.
“The nogesim of Exodus 5 would most likely have been just such junior officers/officials as the stablemasters of the Louvre Leather Roll.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
- Interpretationreasoning
The combination of bricks in a ramp, plus blocks, beams and reed mats, is reflected in parts of the Rekhmire scene.
“The combination of bricks in a ramp, plus blocks, beams and reed mats, is reflected in parts of the famous scene of brickmaking and building in the tomb-chapel of the vizier Rekhmire already mentioned above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Exodus 1:11-14, taskmasters were set over the Israelites to keep them in subjection through forced labour, hard servitude in mortar, in brick, and in all kinds of servitude in the field, with rigour.
“In Exodus 1:11-14, 'taskmasters' (siire-missim) were set over the Israelites to keep them in subjection through forced labour -hard servitude ('abodii qasii) in mortar, in brick, and in all (kinds of) servitude in the field, with rigour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exodus 1:11-14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The Middle Kingdom account-papyri from Thinis and Abydos throw vivid light on closely-organized accounting for building-projects in early-second-millennium Egypt.
“they do throw vivid light on the closely-organized accounting practised in early-second-millennium Egypt, specifically for building-projects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Some Egyptian accounting, such as Papyrus Reisner, is suffocatingly precise, down to the last brick, e.g. 39,118 or 116,511, at least in principle.
“Some of the accounting (e.g.Pap.Reisner) is suffocatingly precise, down to the last brick-e.g.39,118 or 116,511 -at least in principle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the more ordinary building and brick accounts reviewed, the two-tier arrangement is more implicit than explicit, but is nonetheless presupposed.
“In the more ordinary building and brick accounts reviewed briefly above, the two-tier arrangement is more implicit than explicit, but is nonetheless presupposed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Papyrus Reisner I summary yields some 65 bricks produced by each man as his daily stint.
“This yields some 65 bricks produced by each man as his daily stint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The actual making of the bricks in the Louvre Leather Roll was performed not by the stablemasters but by gangs of men working under them.
“But, whatever the arithmetical obscurities, one may be sure that the actual making of all these bricks was performed not by the stablemasters -junior officers, in fact 29 -but by gangs of men working under them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The accounts in Louvre Leather Roll columns II-IV:2, VIII and IX cannot be correlated at present.
“Thus, the accounts in cols.11-IV: 2, VIII and IX cannot be correlated at present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
From the Abusir brick account it is evident that on occasion a variety of officials might have responsibility for supplying definite quantities of brick for a royal temple.
“From so shattered a document not too much can be drawn, but at least it is evident that on occasion a variety of officials might have responsibility for supplying (through subordinates) definite quantities of brick for a royal temple.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The two-tier oversight of the labouring Hebrews corresponds with known Egyptian usage, both explicit and implicit, both in building and in agriculture.
“The two-tier oversight of the labouring Hebrews corresponds with known Egyptian usage, both explicit and implicit, both in building and in agriculture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Abusir brick account records remnants of names of 17 royal officials, probably followed by amounts of bricks now lost, and ends with 'Grand total' and the figure 80.
“Below this are the remnants of names of 17 royal officials of very varied employment probably followed by amounts of bricks (now lost).At the end, an eighteenth column has the phrase 'Grand total' and (in red) the figure 80.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Louvre Leather Roll, column VIII:1 records receipt of bricks for Days 2 to 6 totalling 12,390, and Days 9 to 14 totalling 15,200, giving a grand total of 27,590 bricks.
“Elsewhere in the document, one heading (col.VIII: 1) runs, 'Year 5, 1st month of Shomu [Summer], Day 2; copy(?) of receipt of bricks from .. (someone)', followed by numbers of bricks for Days 2 to 6 of that month (totalling 12,390 bricks), and then for Days 9 to 14 explicitly totalled at 15,200 bricks; the grand total would be 27,590 bricks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe Abusir papyri include a tabulation in three sections, the first of which relates to bricks.
“the miscellaneous accounts include one tabulation in three sections, the first of which relates to bricks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA variety of stamp-impressed bricks are known, not least of Ramesses II.
“A variety of stampimpressed bricks are known, not least of the notorious Ramesses 11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPapyrus Reisner I contains a summary stating 'completed for him in brick -39,118 (bricks) by 602 (enrolled labourers)'.
“An added summary remarks: 'completed for him in brick -39,118 (bricks) by 602 (enrolled labourers)'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPapyrus Reisner III, section E line 14 records assigned for brickwork enrolled men, 200 crossed-out men, x + 124; bricks, 3000 + y, plus further cipherings too damaged to assess.
“Section E, line 14, has: 'assigned for brickwork, enrolled men, 200 [numeral crossed out]men, [x] + 124; bricks, 3000 + [y] ', plus further cipherings too damaged to assess.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationTwo ostraca of the 13th century BC from Deir el-Medina include mention of bricks; one lists amounts of bricks made for the Door, and the other includes 'bricks, 250'.
“Two ostraca of the 13th century BC from the .workmen's village at Deir el-Medina (W.Thebes) include mention of bricks.The first mentions: '[Amounts?] of bricks made for the Do[or ... ] .[Workmen of] the Right Side: Si-Wadjyt, 1 00; [ ....... x .. ], 1 00; Pennub, [rest lost)'.24 Among very varied accounts, the other includes 'bricks, 250'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationLater 12th Dynasty fragmentary brick accounts include an entry totaling 116,511 bricks, with details of 23,603 bricks of 5 palms and 92,908 bricks of 6 palms under Senbef.
“Later in the 12th Dynasty (c.1850 BC), other fragmentary brick accounts 14 include the entry: '(Bricks), total, 116,511; details-bricks of 5 palms (dimension); 23,603; bricks of 6 palms (dimension); 92,908, under (an official) 15 Senbef.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe Louvre Leather Roll, dated to Year 5 of Ramesses II, is a much more extensive document that can now be added to the textual data on bricks in Egypt.
“First published eighty years ago and neglected ever since, this is the 'Louvre Leather Roll', dated to Year 5 of Ramesses 11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataPapyrus Reisner III, section C has a special column of figures for 'serfs making bricks', usually 20 men per day.
“Here, section C (page 3, g) has a special column of figures for 'serfs making bricks', usually 20 men per day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe painted scene in the tomb-chapel of Rekhmire depicts an Egyptian brickyard with workers drawing water, mixing clay, moulding bricks, measuring bricks, and carrying dried bricks to a building site, with overseers.
“A mixed group of workers (Syrians, Nubians, Egyptians) draw large jarfuls of water from a pool, mix water and clay with their hoes, and mould (or 'strike') row upon row of bricks with a hollow rectangular brickmould.One man measures-off a pile of bricks with his hoe, while others carry off yoke-loads of dried bricks 18 to the building site, shown as a structure reached by a sloping ramp.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe Louvre Leather Roll was used as an erasable note pad, where notations could be washed off in favour of new accounts and calculations.
“This document was used as an erasable 'note pad', whereon one set of notations (once finished with) might simply be washed off in favour of new accounts and calculations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationPapyrus Anastasi IV portrays an official posted at a border-post, among whose ills are 'there are no men to mould bricks and no straw in the district'.
“Among his ills, 'there are no men to mould bricks and no straw in the district'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPapyrus Reisner III, section F has notes of what was fulfilled for him in ferrying straw or in brickwork, and section J alludes to work on a building with bricks of Thinis.
“Section F has notes of 'what was fulfilled for him in ferrying straw' or 'in brickwork', while section J alludes to work on a building 'with bricks of Thinis' (lines 16,25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn the Rekhmire scene, there seem to be nine or ten men per overseer.
“While the number of people depicted may simply be adventitious, there seem to be nine or ten men per overseer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA scrap of papyrus from Gurob once listed personnel to whom bricks had been issued, totalling over 39,000, plus a note of 760 other bricks.
“Finally, a scrap of papyrus from Gurob ('Z') near the Fayum once listed personnel to whom bricks had been issued, totalling over 39,000, plus a note of 760 other bricks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn the Louvre Leather Roll, column IX:1 records delivery of bricks for Days 2 to 6 amounting to 22,890 bricks.
“The next heading (IX:l) reads '1st Shomu, Day 2: delivery (or, transport) of bricks', with quantities of bricks for Days 2 to 6 that amount to 22,890 bricks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenPapyrus Reisner III Supplemental is much occupied with brick-clay from various sources, obtained under the eye of minor officials.
“Papyrus Reisner Ill Supplemental is much occupied with brick-clay from various sources, obtained under the eye of minor officials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn Exodus 5, much emphasis is laid on the Hebrews' fulfilling their production-targets for bricks, straw or no straw; this seems particularly true to the emphasis visible in Egyptian documents.
“In Exodus 5, much emphasis is laid on the Hebrews' fulfilling their production-targets for bricks, straw or no straw.This seems particularly true to the emphasis visible in Egyptian documents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe presence of foreigners from the Levant in the Rekhmire scene has attracted attention, especially as the setting is Thebes in the Karnak precinct, not the Delta.
“In this scene, it is the presence of foreigners from the Levant (like the Hebrews) that has so often attracted attentionespecially as the setting is not the Delta but some hundreds of miles south at Thebes in the vast Karnak temple-precinct of the god Amun.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Deir el-Medina worksheets include numerous days when workmen were idle, including men who went to offer to their god; the pharaoh might well have been chary of allowing additional holidays.
“As has been remarked elsewhere, 38 the 'worksheets' of attendances and absences from Deir el-Medina include numerous days when workmen were 'idle', including men who went 'to offer to their god'; the pharaoh, therefore, might well have been chary of allowing any additional holidays!”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExodus 1:11 specifies that the Hebrews were building store-cities, Pithom and Ra'amses.
“Only Exodus 1 : 11 is specific -'storecities, Pithom and Ra'amses'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exodus 1:11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the Old Kingdom Abusir papyri, the various palace officials would not themselves have made or furnished bricks for a royal funerary temple; below them must have been workmen and foremen to make and account to them for the bricks required.
“Thus, in the Old Kingdom Abusir papyri, the various palace officials would not themselves have made or furnished bricks for a royal funerary temple; below them must have been workmen and foremen to make and account to them for the bricks required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe phrase in Papyrus Anastasi III about making quota of bricks daily is strongly reminiscent of Exodus 5:8, 13-14, 18-19.
“a phrase strongly reminiscent of Exodus 5:8, 13-14, 18-19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn Pi-Ramesse, the Hebrews and others would certainly not lack employment nor their products ample uses, especially if it were at the command of Ramesses II.
“In this bustling new capital, intended to rival both Memphis and Thebes, 44 the Hebrews (and others) would certainly not lack employment nor their products ample uses, especially if it were at the command of Ramesses 11, quantitatively the greatest of all Egypt's builder-kings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe figure 80 for 17 officials in the Abusir account seems remarkably small; if bricks are intended, perhaps 80 multiple units are to be understood.
“The figure '80' for 17 officials seems remarkably small Gust over three units per man); if bricks are indeed intended, 4 then perhaps 80 multiple units are to be understood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA short section near the end of the Louvre Leather Roll lists five identically phrased entries each reading 'the document of (So & so), 1 skin', confirming the use of such leather scrolls for ephemeral work-accounts that could be erased and replaced repeatedly.
“This heading is followed by five identicallyphrased entries each reading 'the document of (So & so), 1 skin' -i.e., one leather scroll of the type of the Louvre Leather Roll itself.31 This would confirm the use of such leather scrolls for ephemeral work-accounts that could be erased and replaced repeatedly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe soterim or 'foremen' usage fits the Egyptian setting and is consistent with the use of this word in the rest of the Old Testament down to Chronicles; in varied contexts, soterim tend to be lesser officials and organisers.
“The soterim or 'foremen' is usage that not only fits the Egyptian setting in this case but is also consistent with the use of this word in the rest of the Old Testament right down to Chronicles; in very varied contexts, the soterim tend to be lesser officials and organisers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe word nogesim in Exodus 5 is a general term for 'taskmasters', while sare-missim of Exodus 1:11-14 is more specific, 'directors of forced labour', insofar as missim is probably a plural form of mas, 'forced labour, corvée', attested in cuneiform sources of the second millennium BC.
“The word iwgesim in Exodus 5 is a general term for 'taskmasters' (driving people on), while the sare-missim of Exodus I: 11-14 is slightly more specific, 'directors of forced labour', insofar as missirn is probably a plural form of mas, 'forced labour, corv~e ', the latter word being attested in cuneiform sources of the second millennium BC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe association in the Louvre Leather Roll of bricks, wooden beams and bundles of reeds is no mere accident; plus sand, these are three basic elements used in making constructional scaffolding for massive stone temples characteristic of New Kingdom Egypt.
“The association in one document of bricks, wooden beams and bundles of reeds is no mere accident.Plus sand, these are three basic elements used in making constructional scaffolding when ~recting the massive stone temples”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA target of 2000 bricks each for 40 men would imply a total target of 80,000 bricks over an unknown period, which Virey suggested was a month.
“A target of 2000 bricks each for 40 men would imply a total target of 80,000 bricks to be produced over an unknown period of time (Virey suggested a month).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Exodus 5:1 Moses requests time off for a religious feast, while the king is distinctly less enthusiastic.
“In Exodus 5:1 Moses quite freely requests time off for a religious feast, while the king is distinctly less enthusiastic, particularly for a deity he professes not to know of.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exodus 5:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrom Exodus 5:5ff., the brickmaking Hebrews had to produce a definite quota but were normally given straw or chaff until Pharaoh decreed they should find their own straw but still maintain their output.
“From Exodus 5:5ff., we learn that the brickmaking Hebrews had to produce a definite quota but were normally given straw or chaff for their taskuntil Pharaoh decreed that they should find their own straw but still maintain their output”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exodus 5:5ff.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe days without brick-deliveries in the Louvre Leather Roll may reflect either rest days or occasions of public festival; 1st Shomu, Day 1, was the date of the feast of the goddess Renenutet.
“These days, therefore, may reflect either 'rest days' (for issue of rations, etc.) or occasions of public festival; 1st Shomu, Day 1, was the date of the feast of the goddess Renenutet (a harvest-festival), for example.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Louvre Leather Roll with its 40 stablemasters in charge of brick-production offers counterparts to the nogesim, 'taskmasters', of Exodus 5; these 40 men would each have charge of gangs of labourers led by foremen.
“Closer in time to the exodus, from the New Kingdom data, the Louvre Leather Roll with its 40 stablemasters in charge of brick-production offers us counterparts to the nogesim, 'taskmasters', of Exodus 5; these 40 men would each have charge of gangs of labourers led by foremen (as at Deir el-Medina, and earlier in the Reisner papyri).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe use of straw or chaff, tibn in Arabic, for such bricks is still practiced today.
“The use of straw or chafftibn in Arabic, and used for such bricks even today -needs no additional comment here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn the Deir el-Medina workmen's community, the twin gangs of workmen were led by two foremen appointed from their own number, who along with two scribes were directly responsible to the Theban vizier.
“Here, the twin gangs of workmen were led by two foremen appointed from their own number (as were the Hebrew soterim) who, along with two scribes, were directly responsible in their case to the Theban vizier himself as their superior officer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenRa'amses is well recognised as the Delta capital Pi-Ramesse, which contained palaces, houses, offices, stores, barracks, etc., all of mud brick, besides stone temples erected using scaffolding and ramps of mud brick, wood and reeds, and enclosed within large mud-brick precincts.
“But Ra'amses is well recognised as the Delta capital Pi-Ramesse, where were to be found palaces, houses, offices, stores, barracks, etc., all of mud brick, besides temples of the principal gods of empire, of stone but erected by use of 'scaffolding' and ramps of mud brick, wood and reeds, and enclosed within large precincts walled massively with mud brick and containing many subsidiary structures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The Exodus narrative reliably describes historical conditions of Hebrew brickmaking in Egypt, so that its details can be correlated with Egyptian documentary and pictorial evidence.
“Secondly, the biblical data that form our starting-point may be summed up thus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Egyptian documents, accounts and scenes discussed are representative of the labour practices and conditions that the Hebrews experienced.
“Thirdly, some correlation of the Egyptian data with Exodus 1 and 5 may be essayed under three rubrics: levels of authority, control of work, and miscellaneous points.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Brick total per official is closer to five than three
MinorDividing 80 by 17 gives about 4.7 units per official, not "just over three."
Reported 3 · recomputed 4.705882
“The figure '80' for 17 officials seems remarkably small Gust over three units per man)”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kitchen, Ancient Orient & Old Testament, Tyndale Press, London (1966) 156-7 and references.
- And not necessarily scribes (despite this meaning of the Akkadian cognate sataru). For two illuminating contexts of late date, cf. 2 Chr. 26:11 (scribe and a sot er serving under higher royal officials) and 34:13 (scribes, officers (ioterim) and n. , as the true reading is mdm -so, Virolleaud, Syria 21 (1940), 149, and A. Herdner, Corpus des Tablettes .•• Ras Shamra-Ugarit, I, Imprimerie Nationale & Geuthner, Paris, (1963) 165 & n.l. 44 Pap. Anastasi 11, 1:2-3. 45 Like the Apiru dragging stone for a Memphite pylon of Ramesses 11, Pap. Leiden I 348, verso 6:5-7 (Miscellanies, ad loc.).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building knowledge: anatomy of urban earthen architecture in the Pharaonic town of Elephantine
Izak, J. Z., & Sählhof, M. (2025) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438243.2026.2701860 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Other texts reference mudbricks primarily in administrative contexts, including workforce management, daily production rates, and inventory accounting (Kitchen 1967).”
- Authors
- Kitchen, K. A.
- Corresponding author
- Kitchen, K. A.
- Venue
- Tyndale Bulletin
- Publisher
- Tyndale House
- Published
- 1976-05-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0082-7118 (ISSN-L)
- 2752-7042
- OpenAlex
- W4205583853
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tyndale Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- brick manufacturing, brickfields, Exodus, Old Kingdom, brick masonry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review