The Hebrew Exodus from and Jeremiah’s Eisodus into Egypt in the Light of Recent Archaeological and Geological Developments
Open accessAbstract
Egyptian texts mention two bodies of water on Egypt’s eastern frontier with Sinai, _š-ḥr_ and _p3 t̲wfy_, the latter of which is mentioned in connection with the Exodus (as יַם־סוּף – _yam suf_), while the former occurs in Jeremiah 2:18. Recent palaeoenvironmental work conducted by the North Sinai Archaeological Project, which was in the field from 1998 to 2008 and directed by the author, has shed new light on these bodies of water and the roles they played in the biblical events involving entering and departing Egypt. The 2019 publication of the geological data now allows one to offer some insights into these ancient lakes. Supplemented by new archaeological discoveries, elements of the routes of both journeys can be elucidated.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Hoffmeier synthesizes recent geological and archaeological work on Egypt’s north-eastern frontier to argue that biblical *yam suf* corresponds to Egyptian *p3 twfy*, a substantial lake in the Ballah depression fed by a Nile distributary, not merely a marsh. He also traces how later desiccation reshaped the route taken by Jeremiah and the Judaean refugees into Egypt in 582 BC.
Key findings
- The Ballah Lakes/*p3 twfy* were a robust lake, not just a shallow swamp: Bietak’s 1975 map indicated flood-season merging into one lake about 20 km north–south and 14–15 km east–west; Moshier and Gayed’s transect near Tell Abu Sefêh measured a 3.5 m drop over 100 m and 5.5 m below the upper bank over 320 m, with possible depths of 6–8 m when bank-full.
- Radiocarbon dates from shells in the Ballah depression include 3090 ±40 BP at 2.1 m depth and 3110 ±40 BP at 2.6 m depth; calibrated at 95% confidence to 3380–3220 BP and 3390–3240 BP, suggesting initial widespread lacustrine deposition about 3300 years ago, followed by lake recession over the next two millennia and a return to wetter conditions after 700 BP.
- A previously unknown Nile distributary near Tell el-Borg emerged from the northern end of the Ballah Lakes and flowed east into the eastern lagoon/Pa-Shihor; combined with Egyptian texts and Exodus/Numbers itineraries, this supports locating *yam suf*/*p3 twfy* near Egypt’s frontier, with Exodus 14:2 toponyms clustered between Qantara and about 14 km east, including site T-211 at the southern tip of Shihor.
- For Jeremiah’s *eisodus*, Judaean refugees arriving in 582 BC passed Migdol; Tell Qedua, identified as Migdol of Jeremiah 44:1 and 46:14, measured about 200 × 200 m with walls 11 m thick (up to 17.5 m at towers) and eastern walls widened to 25 m, founded in the Saite period and likely abandoned after damage during the Persian invasion of 525 BC. An Apries year 7 stela (582 BC) matches Nebuchadnezzar’s year 23, and a second stela discovered in May 2021 mentions traversing Sinai and Tjaru/Sile.
Methods
- Synthesis of archaeological and palaeoenvironmental data from the North Sinai Archaeological Project (1998–2008, directed by the author) and Tell el-Borg excavations, including a geological team led by Stephen Moshier with the Egyptian Geological Survey.
- Geological work included drilling 5–7 m below the surface in the Ballah depression, sediment analysis distinguishing lacustrine and fluvial deposits, and radiocarbon dating of shells; satellite and aerial imagery (CORONA 1967, 1957 aerial photograph) helped locate site T-211 and fort features.
- Textual analysis correlated Egyptian sources (Pap. Anastasi III and VIII, Onomasticon of Amenemope) with biblical texts (Exodus, Numbers 33, Jeremiah, Ezekiel) to reconstruct toponyms and travel routes.
Limitations
- Stated: the second Apries stela was discovered in May 2021 during writing, and because only press pictures were available, its text could be studied only cursorily; Tell Abu Sefêh harbour/corniche material awaits publication; site T-211 could not be ground-truthed in 2007 because the area was covered by a metre of sand and turned into a fruit plantation, leaving no remains visible.
- Stated: archaeological evidence is lacking for proposed Baal-Zaphon associations with Tell Deffeneh or Mount Cassius, and details in Genesis 37 are lacking to confirm Rainey’s coastal-route suggestion.
- Evident from the text: several toponym identifications are presented as possibilities or proposals rather than certainties (e.g., Baal (Zaphon?), Pi-hahiroth, Migdol’s location), and the argument depends on correlating Egyptian texts, biblical itineraries, and geological reconstructions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,
The Ballah depression was home to a large lake that, during wet seasons, spilled over to create marshy wetlands where various types of water plants and reeds grew.
“Clearly, the Ballah depression was home to a large lake that, during the wet seasons, spilled over to create marshy wetlands where various types of water plants and reeds grew.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
The first stela reports that the king himself and his armies travelled on 'the road to the east' across Sinai, with the goal 'to smite Asiatics'.
“The stela reports that the king himself and his armies travelled on 'the road to the east' across Sinai (line 4), the goal being 'to smite Asiatics' (line 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
A fort with walls 10 metres thick stood at Hebua I.
“A fort with walls 10 metres thick stood at Hebua I”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
The Qedua fortress, measuring about 200 metres by 200 metres, with walls 11 metres thick (up to 17.5 metres where the towers stood), was the military checkpoint for access to Egypt along the coastal road.
“The Qedua fortress, measuring about 200 metres by 200 metres, with walls 11 metres thick (up to 17.5 metres where the towers stood), was the military checkpoint for access to Egypt along the coastal road”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Two historically significant stelae of Apries/Hophra (589-570 BC) were discovered at Tell Deffeneh (Tahpanhes).
“Recently, two historically significant stelae of Apries/Hophra (589-570 BC) were discovered at Tell Deffeneh (Tahpanhes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Donald Redford's two brief seasons of work at Qedua confirmed Oren's earlier dating of the site.
“Donald Redford's two brief seasons of work at Qedua confirmed Oren's earlier dating of the site”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Redford
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Hebua II has a Saite-period settlement within the old New Kingdom-fortified wall that had in earlier centuries been Egypt's major border fort (ḫtm n t3rw).
“Hebua II has a Saite-period settlement within the old New Kingdom-fortified wall 61 that had in earlier centuries been Egypt's major border fort (ḫtm n t3rw).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. The Hebrew Exodus
The Nilotic component to the lake means that its level fluctuated with the Nile's annual flood cycle.
“This Nilotic component to the lake means that its level fluctuated with the Nile's annual flood cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,
The Egyptian textual evidence, coupled with the toponymic sequence in the Exodus and Numbers 33 itineraries, demonstrates that yam suf was located close to Egypt, if not on its frontier with Sinai.
“The Egyptian textual evidence, coupled with the toponymic sequence in the Exodus and Numbers 33 itineraries -showing only two campsites before reaching ם-סּוף ,יַ the third stop -demonstrates that it was located close to Egypt, if not on its frontier with Sinai.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The toponymic sequence in the Exodus and Numbers 33 itineraries is reliable for locating yam suf.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract
The 2019 publication of geological data allows insights into these ancient lakes.
“The 2019 publication of the geological data now allows one to offer some insights into these ancient lakes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew Exodus
Pap. Anastasi III indicates p3 š-ḥr is a location from which water plants are brought to Pi-Ramesses.
“The later identification comes from Pap. Anastasi III in which p3 š-ḥr is a location from which water plants are brought to the capital, Pi-Ramesses: 'p3 twfy comes to it with rushes (mnḥw) and the Lake of Horus (p3 š-ḥr) with reeds (isyw).'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gardiner, Late-Egyptian Miscellanies
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract
Recent palaeoenvironmental work by the North Sinai Archaeological Project (1998-2008, directed by the author) has shed new light on these bodies of water and their roles in biblical events.
“Recent palaeoenvironmental work conducted by the North Sinai Archaeological Project, which was in the field from 1998 to 2008 and directed by the author, has shed new light on these bodies of water and the roles they played in the biblical events involving entering and departing Egypt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. The Hebrew Exodus
The nature of the region inspired the descriptive name p3 twfy/yam suf.
“Evidently it was the nature of this region which inspired the descriptive name p3 ם-סּוף/twfy .יַ”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract
Supplemented by new archaeological discoveries, elements of the routes of both journeys can be elucidated.
“Supplemented by new archaeological discoveries, elements of the routes of both journeys can be elucidated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew Exodus
Bietak's 1975 study showed the Ballah depression was made up of three smaller depressions or lakes that, during flood season, could expand to merge into one large lake about twenty kilometres long and fourteen to fifteen kilometres wide.
“Bietak's 1975 study of the area, based on older topographical maps, showed that the Ballah depression was made up of three smaller depressions or lakes that, during the flood season, could have expanded to merge into one large lake about twenty kilometres long from north to south and at places fourteen to fifteen kilometres wide from east to west.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bietak
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. The Hebrew Exodus
The name Abu Sefêh appears to preserve the ancient name p3 twfy in Arabic.
“Hence, the name Abu Sefêh appears to preserve the ancient name p3 twfy in Arabic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoffmeier
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew Exodus
The Hebrew Shihor is the writing for the Egyptian toponym p3 š-ḥr, 'the Water or Lake of Horus'.
“The Hebrew יחֹור ִ ׁש is the writing for the Egyptian toponym p3 š-ḥr ( ), 'the Water or Lake of Horus'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Muchiki
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites HALOT
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,
The defunct north Sinai Nile channel, which runs east into the eastern lagoon (Pa-Shihor) about fifteen kilometres away, is a possible feature that might correspond to Pihahiroth (Exod. 14:2).
“Thanks to the discovery of the aforementioned defunct north Sinai Nile channel, which runs east into the eastern lagoon (Pa-Shihor), about fifteen kilometres away, we have a possible feature that might correspond to Pihahiroth (Exod.14:2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
It can be inferred from Jeremiah 44:1 and 46:14 that the Judaean refugees, including Jeremiah and Baruch, who arrived in Egypt in 582 BC, passed by Migdol.
“It can be inferred from Jeremiah 44:1 and 46:14 that the Judaean refugees, including Jeremiah and Baruch, who arrived in Egypt in 582 BC, passed by Migdol.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jeremiah 44:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Jeremiah 46:14
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The biblical narratives of the Exodus and Jeremiah's eisodus describe real historical journeys whose geographical details can be mapped.
- Premisecitation§ 4. Conclusions
At Tahpanhes, Jeremiah warned that Apries/Hophra would be given into the hand of his enemy.
“There, he warned that Apries/Hophra would be given into the hand of his enemy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,
In the area between the Suez Canal at Qantara and about fourteen kilometres to the east, there is a collocation of four toponyms mentioned in Exodus 14:2: p3 twfy/yam suf, Pi-hahiroth, Baal (Zaphon?), and Migdol.
“Consequently, in this area, between the Suez Canal at Qantara and about fourteen kilometres to the east (where the proposed location of Migdol is at the southern end of Shihor), we have the collocation of four toponyms mentioned in Exodus 14:2, viz, p3 ם-סּוף/twfy ,יַ Pi-hahiroth, Baal (Zaphon?), and Migdol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Many of the Judaeans who had fled to Egypt were deserting soldiers whose services were marketable in Saite Egypt.
“It appears then that many of the Judaeans who had fled to Egypt were deserting soldiers whose services were marketable in Saite Egypt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Ezekiel, writing about the same time as Jeremiah in Babylon, refers to Egypt's territory as being Migdol to Syene (Aswan), both fortified frontier sites.
“Ezekiel, writing about the same time as Jeremiah in distant Babylon, refers to Egypt's territory as being Migdol to Syene, i.e.Aswan (Ezek 29:10; 30:6), both being fortified frontier sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ezek 29:10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ezek 30:6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Conclusions
Due to the militarised nature of the region, the Hebrews avoided this means of egress (Exod 13:17).
“Due to the militarised nature of the region, the Hebrews avoided this means of egress (Exod 13:17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exod 13:17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
The campaign recorded on the stelae was presumably launched from Tahpanhes.
“The campaign was presumably launched from Tahpanhes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
All the locations mentioned by Jeremiah had military installations where Judaean mercenaries likely served, as suggested by the Aramaic papyri of the Jewish community of Elephantine Island in Aswan.
“All the locations mentioned by Jeremiah had military installations where Judaean mercenaries likely served, as suggested by the Aramaic papyri of the Jewish community of Elephantine Island in Aswan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [68]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
On the north-eastern shore of Shihor stood a large fortress at Tell Qedua that Oren excavated and identified as Migdol of Jeremiah (44:1; 46:14) and Ezekiel (29:10; 30:6).
“On the north-eastern shore of Shihor stood a large fortress at Tell Qedua that Oren excavated and identified as Migdol of Jeremiah (44:1; 46:14) and Ezekiel (29:10; 30:6) (Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oren
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
The new inscription mentions passing by Tjaru/Sile (t3rw), demonstrating that the army was traversing the road from Tahpanhes to Migdol in order to reach the southern Levant.
“The new inscription mentions passing by Tjaru/Sile (t3rw), which demonstrates that the army was traversing the road from Tahpanhes to Migdol in order to reach the southern Levant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 4. Conclusions
Through the zone between Egypt's delta and Sinai passed the coastal highway that led from Egypt to Canaan.
“Through this zone between Egypt's delta and Sinai passed the coastal highway that led from Egypt to Canaan.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
The range of toponyms in Jeremiah and Ezekiel indicates that Judaeans were located from Egypt's northern frontier all the way to the border with Kush (Nubia).
“This range of toponyms indicates that Judaeans were located from Egypt's northern frontier all the way to the border with Kush (Nubia).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Saite Egypt's armies included many mercenaries, as Herodotus reports.
“Its armies included many mercenaries, Herodotus reports.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Herodotus
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Conclusions
The new and more direct route was taken by Jeremiah and the fleeing Judaeans (Jer 43:7-8; 44:1) probably just before, in 582 BC, the Egyptian armies marched east to prevent a Chaldean invasion of Egypt.
“Interestingly, this new and more direct route was taken by Jeremiah and the fleeing Judaeans (Jer 43:7-8; 44:1) probably just before, in 582 BC, the Egyptian armies marched east to prevent a Chaldean invasion of Egypt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jer 43:7-8
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Jer 44:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
It is doubtful that Tell Ghaba could have flourished at its location during the New Kingdom, when the lagoon was fed by two free-flowing distributaries.
“It is doubtful that this site could have flourished at this location during the New Kingdom, when the lagoon was fed by two free-flowing distributaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's Eisodus
Jeremiah mentions Judaeans in Memphis, where Apries built a palace and fortress.
“Jeremiah mentions those in Memphis, Egypt's traditional capital at the base of the Delta, where Apries built a palace and fortress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Conclusions
The Israelites headed south-east towards the Wadi Tumilat (Exod 13:18).
“The Israelites, therefore, headed south-east towards the Wadi Tumilat (Exod 13:18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exod 13:18
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 21
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusAnalysis of sediments shows some deposits were lacustrine and others fluvial, indicating that a Nile distributary fed the lake somewhere on its west side.
“Analysis of the sediments show that some deposits were lacustrine and others fluvial in nature, indicating that a Nile distributary fed the lake somewhere on its west side (see Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,During the New Kingdom or Late Bronze Age (ca. 1500-1200 BC) and earlier, two Nile distributaries fed the eastern lagoon (Shihor), and in its northern reaches it debouched into the Mediterranean.
“During the New Kingdom or Late Bronze Age (ca.1500-1200 BC) and earlier, two Nile distributaries fed this eastern lagoon (Shihor), and in its northern reaches it debouched into the Mediterranean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusAbout twenty kilometres west of Tjaru sits Tell Deffeneh (or Dafana).
“About twenty kilometres west of Tjaru sits Tell Deffeneh (or Dafana).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusThe second stela was discovered in May 2021 during the writing of the paper.
“The second stela was discovered in May 2021 during the writing of this paper.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusBased on the ceramic evidence, Oren dated the founding of the fort to the Saite period or seventh century.
“Based on the ceramic evidence, Oren dated the founding of the fort to the Saite period or seventh century”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oren
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusThe second stela's inscription treats the same military expedition and mentions traversing Sinai with armies and horses.
“the inscription likewise treats the same military expedition and also mentions traversing Sinai with armies and horses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusThe first stela was discovered in 2011 by Mohamed Abd el-Maksoud and dates to Apries' seventh year (582 BC).
“The first stela was discovered in 2011 by Mohamed Abd el-Maksoud and dates to Apries' seventh year (582 BC).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusTell Ghaba was founded as early as the tenth century and occupies a spot on the inside of a barrier island close to the lagoon's mouth.
“About five kilometres west of Qedua/Migdol sits Tell Ghaba, which was founded as early as the tenth century and occupies a spot on the inside of a barrier island close to the lagoon's mouth”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 4. ConclusionsEgypt's north-eastern frontier was a maze of lakes, wetlands, Nile distributaries, and sand dunes with forts situated in strategic locations to guard land and sea access to Egypt.
“Egypt's north-eastern frontier was a maze of lakes, wetlands, Nile distributaries, and sand dunes with forts situated in strategic locations to guard land and sea access to Egypt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusTell Hebua is situated seven kilometres west of Tell Ghaba.
“Tell Hebua is situated seven kilometres west of Ghaba.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusThe word yam suf applies to a variety of water plants.
“and it is agreed that the word applies to a variety of water plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,Barry Beitzel has made a sustained and compelling case that yam suf in the Exodus narratives is located close to Egypt, against those advocating it is the distant Gulf of Aqaba.
“Recently, Barry Beitzel has made a sustained and compelling case for this view against those advocating that ם-סּוף יַ in the Exodus narratives is the distant Gulf of Aqaba.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beitzel
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ Abstractp3 twfy is mentioned in connection with the Exodus as yam suf.
“the latter of which is mentioned in connection with the Exodus (as ם-סּוף יַ -yam suf)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusThe correspondence between p3 twfy and Hebrew yam suf has long been recognised.
“The correspondence between p3 twfy and Hebrew ם-סּוף יַ (yam suf) has long been recognised”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Brugsch
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Müller
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gardiner
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusThe parallelism in Pap. Anastasi III suggested to Gardiner that p3 twfy and p3 š-ḥr were geographically proximate.
“The parallelism in this line suggested to Sir Alan Gardiner that the two bodies of water were geographically proximate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gardiner
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusJeremiah 2:18 situates Shihor on Egypt's eastern frontier.
“Similarly, Jeremiah 2:18 situates Shihor on Egypt's eastern frontier and will be discussed further below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,p3 twfy had a large marshy area that surrounded a lake fed by a Nile distributary, but it could have been reduced to three smaller lakes during the dry season.
“In other words, p3 twfy had a large marshy area that surrounded a lake that was fed by a Nile distributary, but it could have been reduced to three smaller lakes during the dry season.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusSeveral sizeable lakes were located in Egypt's north-eastern Delta and the Isthmus of Sinai.
“From Egyptian and biblical texts, it has long been known that several sizeable lakes were located in Egypt's north-eastern Delta and the Isthmus of Sinai.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ AbstractEgyptian texts mention two bodies of water on Egypt's eastern frontier with Sinai, š-ḥr and p3 twfy.
“Egyptian texts mention two bodies of water on Egypt's eastern frontier with Sinai, š-ḥr and p3 twfy”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusBietak proposed that p3 twfy is the now-defunct Ballah Lakes that run south about twenty kilometres from modern Qantara to just north of Ismailiya.
“and that p3 twfy is the now-defunct Ballah Lakes that run south about twenty kilometres from modern Qantara to just north of Ismailiya (Fig. 23).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bietak
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ Abstractš-ḥr occurs in Jeremiah 2:18.
“while the former occurs in Jeremiah 2:18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusBietak proposed that p3 š-ḥr (Shihor) was the lake east of Qantara East and south-west of Pelusium.
“Bietak agreed, proposing that p3 š-ḥr (Shihor) was the lake east of Qantara East and south-west of Pelusium”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bietak, Tell el Dab'a II
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. The Hebrew ExodusShihor is located 'al pene' Egypt (in front of/before Egypt).
“Joshua 13:3, we learn that יחֹור ִ ׁש (Shihor) is located י נֵ ּפְ ל עַ ('al pene -'in front of ' or 'before') Egypt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusThe 2011 Apries stela supports the claim that Judaean soldiers were incorporated as mercenaries by referring to 'foreigners (ḫ3styw) who accompanied his majesty', and Jeremiah mentions hired soldiers among Egypt's troops (Jer 46:21).
“The 2011 Apries stela seemingly supports this claim by referring to 'foreigners (ḫ3styw) who accompanied his majesty' (line 5), and Jeremiah too mentions the hired soldiers among Egypt's troops (Jer 46:21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jer 46:21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusJeremiah delivered his message at Tahpanhes, criticising those who had come to Egypt for refuge and warning that Nebuchadnezzar would invade (Jer 44).
“It was at this site that Jeremiah delivered his blistering message, criticising those who had come to Egypt for refuge and warning that Nebuchadnezzar would invade (Jer 44).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jer 44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusBy the Third Intermediate Period (1069-525 BC), Shihor clearly still contained water, as demonstrated by the fact that no archaeological sites have been discovered within the basin, even from as late as Roman, Byzantine, or Islamic periods.
“By the Third Intermediate Period (1069-525 BC), Shihor clearly still contained water, as demonstrated by the fact that no archaeological sites have been discovered within the basin, even from as late as Roman, Byzantine, or Islamic periods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusWhen Jeremiah 2:18 mentions Shihor in parallelism with the Euphrates, it is because both bodies of water served as a natural boundary marker to the respective lands of Assyria and Egypt.
“When Jeremiah 2:18 mentions Shihor in parallelism with the Euphrates, it is because both bodies of water served as a natural boundary marker to the respective lands of Assyria and Egypt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,Starting in the thirteenth century BC, due to reduced volume of the Nile, some eastern branches began to desiccate, including those that fed Shihor, resulting in the lagoon being reduced to a smaller, brackish lake.
“Starting in the thirteenth century BC, due to reduced volume of the Nile, some of the eastern branches began to desiccate, including those that fed Shihor, resulting in the lagoon being reduced to a smaller, brackish lake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Butzer
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Said
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. ConclusionsAt the edge of the Sinai wilderness at the end of the Wadi, God instructed the Israelites to turn back (Exod 14:1-2), apparently turning towards a cluster of toponyms near the area around the northern end of p3 twfy and the southern tip of Shihor.
“But at the edge of the Sinai wilderness at the end of the Wadi, God instructed them to turn back בּו( ׁשֻ יָ וְ -veyashuvu; Exod 14:1-2), apparently turning towards a cluster of toponyms that appear to be near the area around the northern end of p3 twfy and the southern tip of Shihor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Exod 14:1-2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,The Shihor lagoon was approximately eight by eight kilometres, meaning that travelling towards the Levant and launching a journey from Tjaru/Sile required travellers to circle south around Shihor before turning east and following the coast to Gaza.
“This lagoon was approximately eight by eight kilometres, meaning that travelling towards the Levant and launching a journey from Tjaru/Sile required travellers to circle south around Shihor before turning east and following the coast to Gaza (see Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusA Saite date (664-610 BC) is generally assigned to the origins of the fort at Qedua/Migdol.
“While a Saite date (664-610 BC) 58 is generally assigned to the origins of this fort”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusThe same route from Tahpanhes to Migdol would also have been taken by Esarhaddon's armies and by Jeremiah and the band of Judaean refugees entering Egypt.
“This same route would also have been taken by Esarhaddon's armies and by Jeremiah and the band of Judaean refugees entering Egypt”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. ConclusionsIf p3 twfy was the sea traversed by the escaping Hebrews, it was a large lake with deep waters, surrounded by wetlands consisting of reeds and rushes, which resulted in the descriptive name of the area and the lake.
“Now we can say with certainty that if p3 ם-סּוף/twfy יַ was the sea traversed by the escaping Hebrews, it was a large lake with deep waters, surrounded by wetlands consisting of reeds and rushes, which resulted in the descriptive name of the area and the lake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. ConclusionsThis development allowed a more direct road to go from Migdol (Tell Qedua), the entry checkpoint, to Tell Ghaba and the fort at Tjaru, followed by Daphne/Tahpanhes, where Jeremiah received the word of the Lord and preached his message (Jer 44:1-30).
“This development allowed a more direct road to go from Migdol (Tell Qedua), the entry checkpoint, to Tell Ghaba and the fort at Tjaru, followed by Daphne/ Tahpanhes, where Jeremiah received the word of the Lord and preached his message (Jer 44:1-30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jer 44:1-30
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusTell Deffeneh is identified with Tahpanhes (Jer 44:1) and is also a military site.
“This site is identified with Tahpanhes (Jer 44:1) and is also a military site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jer 44:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [64]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. ConclusionsConsequently, the earlier route around southern Shihor was abandoned when it became an enclosed lake and a new road was established across the old barrier island that formed the Bronze Age coast where the earlier opening to the Mediterranean had become terra firma.
“Consequently, the earlier route around southern Shihor was abandoned when it became an enclosed lake and a new road was established across the old barrier island that formed the Bronze Age coast where the earlier opening to the Mediterranean had become terra firma.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusHophra's army would have checked in at Migdol, where additional troops were likely added for the campaign across Sinai to discourage the Chaldeans from attempting to invade Egypt.
“Hophra's army would have checked in at Migdol, where additional troops were likely added for the campaign across Sinai to discourage the Chaldeans from attempting to invade Egypt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusJeremiah mentions Pathros, which corresponds to Egyptian p3 t3 rsy, 'the south land', i.e. Upper Egypt.
“Lastly, Jeremiah mentions Pathros, which corresponds to Egyptian p3 t3 rsy, 'the south land', i.e.Upper Egypt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4. ConclusionsThe recent archaeological and geological investigations in north Sinai now permit us to peer back three and four millennia to understand the ancient landscape.
“The recent archaeological and geological investigations in north Sinai now permit us to peer back three and four millennia to understand the ancient landscape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Ballah Lakes corrects these faulty assumptions. According to Moshier and Gayed,The reduced flow of the Nile and poor inundations eventually led to the silting up of sections of the Bubastite Nile distributary, which in turn resulted in the abandonment of the Delta capital, Pi-Ramesses, around 1130 BC.
“The reduced flow of the Nile and poor inundations eventually led to the silting up of sections of the Bubastite Nile distributary.This, in turn, resulted in the abandonment of the Delta capital, Pi-Ramesses, around 1130 BC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoffmeier
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusAccording to Herodotus, Psammetichus I (664-610 BC) established a military base at Tahpanhes to defend Egypt from invasions from western Asia.
“Here, according to Herodotus, Psammetichus I (664-610 BC) established a military base to defend Egypt from invasions from western Asia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Herodotus
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusA reference to 'Migdol' in Esarhaddon's records during his 671 BC invasion of Egypt suggests a possible earlier, twenty-fifth-Dynasty date for the fort's construction in anticipation of Assyrian invasions.
“a reference to 'Migdol' in the records of Esarhaddon during his invasion of Egypt in 671 BC suggests that a possible earlier, twentyfifth-Dynasty date for its construction -in anticipation of the Assyrian invasions of Egypt -is a possibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Jeremiah's EisodusShihor's water in Jeremiah's day was largely brackish and stagnant, and due to continued desiccation, the opening to the Mediterranean was closed.
“Shihor's water in Jeremiah's day, therefore, was largely brackish and stagnant, and due to continued desiccation, the opening to the Mediterranean was closed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The biblical narratives of the Exodus and Jeremiah's eisodus describe real historical journeys whose geographical details can be mapped.
“The new data permit us to understand better two important biblical travel narratives, viz, the exodus from Egypt and eisodos of Jeremiah and the band of Judaean exiles who sought refuge in Egypt after the assassination of Gedaliah (2 Kgs 25:22-26; Jer 40).”
“Supplemented by new archaeological discoveries, elements of the routes of both journeys can be elucidated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The toponymic sequence in the Exodus and Numbers 33 itineraries is reliable for locating yam suf.
“The Egyptian textual evidence, coupled with the toponymic sequence in the Exodus and Numbers 33 itineraries -showing only two campsites before reaching ם-סּוף ,יַ the third stop -demonstrates that it was located close to Egypt, if not on its frontier with Sinai.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The geological and archaeological data from Tell el-Borg and the Ballah Lakes are representative of the broader ancient frontier lakes and can be extrapolated to them.
“The new data indicate that during the New Kingdom and into the Ramesside era, the frontier lakes were thriving.”
“Clearly, the Ballah depression was home to a large lake that, during the wet seasons, spilled over to create marshy wetlands where various types of water plants and reeds grew.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The biblical narratives of Exodus and Jeremiah reliably preserve historical events and geographical details relevant to reconstructing the route of the Hebrews and Jeremiah's journey into Egypt.
“Due to the militarised nature of the region, the Hebrews avoided this means of egress (Exod 13:17).”
“Interestingly, this new and more direct route was taken by Jeremiah and the fleeing Judaeans (Jer 43:7-8; 44:1) probably just before, in 582 BC, the Egyptian armies marched east to prevent a Chaldean invasion of Egypt.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting journal volumes for the same article
MinorThe article "The Curious Phenomenon of Moving Military Sites on Egypt's Eastern Frontier" is cited as volume 36 in one note and volume 45 elsewhere, with the same year and pages.
“'The Curious Phenomenon of Moving Military Sites on Egypt's Eastern Frontier', JSSEA 36 (2018/19): 105-134.”
“'The Curious Phenomenon of Moving Military Sites on Egypt's Eastern Frontier'. JSSEA 45 (2018/19): 105-134.”
Conflicting publication years for Tell el-Borg I
MinorThe text dates Tell el-Borg I to 2015, but a citation to the same volume gives 2014.
“Tell el-Borg I (2015) and Tell el-Borg II (2019)”
“in Tell el-Borg I: Excavations in North Sinai. Edited by J. K. Hoffmeier. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2014.”
Cites
Chapter 12: What does the Anthropocene hold for citizenship?
(2019) · edoc (University of Basel) · doi:10.1007/978-3 · Cited by 11,533 · see citing works
Semitic Words in Egyptian Texts of the New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period
Hoch, J. E. (1994) · doi:10.1515/9781400863884 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Early Hydraulic Civilization in Egypt: A Study in Cultural Ecology
Tuan, Y., & Butzer, K. W. (1977) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213735 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Caminos, R. A., & Gardiner, A. H. (1954) · Cited by 283 · see citing works
The River Nile Geology, hydrology and utilization
Duck, R. W. (1994) · Journal of African Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/0899-5362(94)90056-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
The Elephantine Papyri in English
Porten, Färber, Martin, M. D., et al. (1996) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004669079 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
The Ancient Military Road between Egypt and Palestine
Gardiner, A. H. (1920) · The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology · doi:10.1177/030751332000600112 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
The Raging Torrent: Historical Inscriptions from Assyria and Babylonia Relating to Ancient Israel
Cogan, M. (2008) · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Avaris, the Capital of the Hyksos. Recent Excavations at Tell el-Dab'a
Phillips, J., & Bietak, M. (1998) · The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology · doi:10.2307/3822227 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Third Intermediate Period, Egypt
Dodson, A. (2019) · The Encyclopedia of Ancient History · doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah15136.pub2 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Egyptian Loan Words in the Old Testament
Lambdin, T. O. (1953) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.2307/595204 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Migdol: A New Fortress on the Edge of the Eastern Nile Delta
Oren, E. D. (1984) · Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · doi:10.2307/1356923 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Saite Forts in Egypt: Political-military history of the Saite Dynasty
Smoláriková, K. (2008) · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Late Bronze Age paleogeography along the ancient Ways of Horus in Northwest Sinai, Egypt
Moshier, S. O., & El‐Kalani, A. (2008) · Geoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/gea.20227 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Egyptian Proper Names and Loanwords in North-West Semitic
Muchiki, Y. (2010) · SBL Press eBooks · doi:10.15699/9780884147725 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Lupo, S., & Kohen, C. I. (2015) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.30861/9781407314174 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ward, W. A. (1974) · Vetus Testamentum · doi:10.1163/156853374x00251 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Hoffmeier, J. K. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/0195155467.001.000 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationEgyptian Proper Names and Loanwords in North-West Semitic
Schneider, T., & Muchiki, Y. (2001) · The Jewish Quarterly Review · doi:10.2307/1455619 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Baal Zaphon, Zeus Kasios und der Durchzug der Israeliten durchs Meer
Eißfeldt, O. (1932) · M. Niemeyer eBooks · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A New Military Site on ‘The ways of Horus’-Tell El-Borg 1999–2001: A Preliminary Report
Hoffmeier, J. K., & El-Maksoud, M. A. (2003) · The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology · doi:10.1177/030751330308900109 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationBietak, M. (2015) · Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04768-3_2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hoffmeier, J. K. (2018) · Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research · doi:10.5615/bullamerschoorie.380.0001 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationReport on the 1993 and 1997 Seasons at Tell Qedwa
Redford, D. B. (1998) · Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt · doi:10.2307/40000460 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Hussein, H., & el-Alim, E. A. (2015) · Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections · doi:10.2458/azu_jaei_v07i1_hussein · Cited by 6 · see citing works
What Really Happened at the Sea of Reeds?
Hay, L. S. (1964) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3264173 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
El-Maksoud, M. A., & Valbelle, D. (2005) · Revue d Égyptologie · doi:10.2143/re.56.0.2004950 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Search for Migdol of the New Kingdom and Exodus 14:2: An Update
Hoffermeier, J. K. (2009) · Buried History The Journal of the Australian Institute of Archaeology · doi:10.62614/e91a1q35 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chapter 2. Geological Investigation of the Ballah Depression, Northern Suez Canal Zone, Egypt
Moshier, S. O. (2019) · Penn State University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781646020058-005 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Elsayed Abdel-Alim, 'Tell Habua: New Discoveries from the Saite Period', Egyptian Archaeology 56 (2020): 10-15.
- Mohamed Abd el-Maksoud and Dominique Valbelle, 'Une stèle de l'an 7 d'Apries découverte sur le site de Tell Défenneh', REg 64 (2013): 1-13, https://doi.org/10.2143/ RE.64.0.3011326. · DOI
- Cazelles, Henri. 'Les localisations de l'Exode et la critique littéraire'. RB 62 (1955): 321-364.
- ----. Ancient Egyptian Onomastica II. London: Oxford University Press, 1947.
- Groll, Sarah I. 'The Egyptian Background of the Exodus and the Crossing of the Reed Sea: A New Reading of Papyrus Anastasi VIII'. Pages 173-192 in Jerusalem Studies in Egyptology.
- Hermann, Siegfried. Israel in Egypt. London: SCM Press, 1973. Herodotus. Herodotus and the Histories. Translated by Walter Blanco and Jennifer T. Roberts. New York: Norton, 1992.
- Hoffmeier, James K. 'A New Insight on Pharaoh Apries from Herodotus, Diodorus and Jeremiah 46:17'. JSSEA 11 (1981): 165-170.
- ----. 'Reconstructing Egypt's Eastern Frontier Defense Network in the New Kingdom (Late Bronze Age)'. Pages 163-194 in The Power of Walls: Fortifications in Ancient Northeastern Africa. Edited by F. Jesse and C. Vogel. Colloquium Africanum 5; Köln: Heinrich-Barth- Institut, 2013.
- Hoffmeier, James K. and Stephen O. Moshier. '"A Highway Out of Egypt": The Main Road from Egypt to Canaan'. Pages 485-510 in Desert Road Archaeology in Ancient Egypt and Beyond.
- ----. '"The Ways of Horus": Reconstructing Egypt's Eastern Frontier Defense Network and the Military Road to Canaan in New Kingdom Times'. Pages 34-61 in Tell el-Borg I: Excavations in North Sinai. Edited by J. K. Hoffmeier. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2014.
- Kitchen, K. A. Ramesside Inscriptions, Historical and Biographical III. Oxford: Blackwells, 1980.
- Leclère, François. 'Tell Dafana: Identity, Explorations and Monuments'. Pages 1-40 in Tell Dafana Reconsidered: The Archaeology of an Egyptian Frontier Town. Edited by F. Leclère and A. J. Spencer. London: The British Museum, 2014.
- Lupo, Silvia and Claudia Kohen. Tell el-Ghaba III: A Third Intermediate-Early Saite Period Site in the Egyptian Eastern Delta: Excavations 1995-1999 and 2010 in Areas I, II, VI and VIII. Oxford: BAR, 2015. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407314174. · DOI
- Müller, Max. 'A Contribution to the Exodus Geography'. Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archaeology 10 (1888): 467-477.
- Redford, Donald B. 'Report on the 1993 and 1997 Seasons at Tell Qedwa'. JARCE 35 (1998): 45-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/40000460. · DOI
- Scolnic, Benjamin E. 'A New Working Hypothesis for the Identification of Migdol'. Pages 91- 120 in The Future of Biblical Archaeology: Reassessing Methodologies and Assumptions. Edited by J. K. Hoffmeier and A. R. Millard. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.
- Stewart, Christopher, Kris Lemmens, and Maura Sala. 'Satellite Radar in Support to Archaeological Research in Egypt: Tracing Ancient Tracks Between the Southern Levant Across North Sinai'. Archaeological Heritage and Multidisciplinary Egyptological Studies 2 (2015): 199-221.
- Valbelle, Dominique. 'La (les) route(s)-d'Horus'. Pages 379-386 in Hommages à Jean Leclant, vol.
- ----. 'One More Time -"The Ways of Horus"'. Pages 1607-1613 in Guardian of Ancient Egypt: Studies in Honor of Zahi Hawass, vol.
- Valbelle, D., F. Le Saout, M. Chartier-Raymond, M. Abd el-Samie, C. Traunecker, G. Wagner, Y.- Y. Carrez-Maratray, and P. Zignani. 'Reconnaissance archéologique à la pointe orientale du Delta: Rapport préliminaire sur les saisons 1990 et 1991'. CRIPEL 14 (1992): 11-22.
- Vervenne, M. 'The Lexeme Sûph and the Phrase Yam Sûph: A Brief Reflection on the Etymology and Semantics of a Key Word in the Hebrew Exodus Tradition'. Pages 403-429 in Immigration and Emigration within the Ancient Near East, Festschrift E. Lipinska. Edited by K. van Lerberghe and A. Schooks. Leuven: Orientalia Louaniensia Analecta, 1995.
- Authors
- Hoffmeier, J. K.
- Corresponding author
- Hoffmeier, James K.
- Venue
- Tyndale Bulletin
- Publisher
- Tyndale House
- Published
- 2021-12-31
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 73-95
- ISSN
- 0082-7118 (ISSN-L)
- 2752-7042
- OpenAlex
- W4214583390
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Tyndale Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- Exodus, Jeremiah, Red Sea, ancient lakes, North Sinai, paleoenvironment, biblical geography, biblical archaeology, biblical geology, Egyptian texts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review