Behavioural cognitive therapy in the primary care setting: issues in organization*
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychological therapies have usually offered one-to-one interventions to relatively few patients ('high contact, low volume'), whereas primary care services have offered short appointments to a large number of patients ('low contact, high volume').
“In addition, while primary care services have offered short appointments to a large number of patients, described as 'low contact, high volume' services, 4 psychological therapies have usually offered oneto-one interventions to relatively few patients, these being described as 'high contact, low volume' interventions. 4”
From Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments? (2010) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407 · see citing works
General Health Questionnaire-28
Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t16058-000 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Pathways to Psychiatric Care in South Manchester
Gater, R. A., & Goldberg, D. (1991) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.159.1.90 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Can a self-referral system help improve access to psychological treatments?
Brown, J. S., Boardman, J., Whittinger, N., & Ashworth, M. (2010) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp10x501877 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- France, R., & General Practitioner, C.
- Corresponding author
- France, Richard
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Forum
- Publisher
- British Psychological Society
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 76
- Pages
- 2-5
- ISSN
- 1747-5732 (ISSN-L)
- 2396-8664
- OpenAlex
- W4315747891
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Forum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- primary care, organizational challenges, mental health services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
