Cited by 35Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPrimary Care and Health OutcomesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Diagnoses of Patients with Severe Subjective Health Complaints in Scandinavia: A Cross Sectional Study

Open access
Maeland, Silje, Werner, Erik L., Rosendal, Marianne, Jonsdottir, Ingibjorg H., Magnussen, Liv H., Ursin, Holger, Eriksen, Hege R.·2012·ISRN Public Health

Abstract

Background. A diagnosis is the basis of medical action, the key to various social privileges and national sick leave statistics. The objectives of this study were to investigate which diagnoses general practitioners in Scandinavia give patients with severe subjective health complaints, and what kind of treatments they suggested. Methods. One hundred and twenty-six self-selected general practitioners in Scandinavia diagnosed nine patients, presented as video vignettes, in a cross-sectional study. The main outcome measures were primary, secondary, and tertiary diagnoses. Results. The nine patients got between 13 and 31 different primary diagnoses and a large variety of secondary and tertiary diagnoses. Fifty-eight percent of the general practitioners chose different primary and secondary diagnoses, indicating that they judged the patients to have multimorbid complaints. The most commonly recommended treatment was referral to a psychologist, a mix of psychological and physical treatments, or treatment by the general practitioner. Conclusion. Scandinavian general practitioners give a large variety of symptom diagnoses, mainly psychological and general and unspecified, to patients with severe subjective health complaints. Referral to a psychologist or a mix of psychological or physical treatments was most commonly suggested to treat the patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5402/2012/851097

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. L. S. King, Medical Thinking. A Historical Prefase, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1982.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maeland, S., Werner, E. L., Rosendal, M., Jonsdottir, I. H., Magnussen, L. H., Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Uni Research, Uni Health, P.O Box 7810, 5020 Bergen, Norway
  • Uni Research (Norway) (NO)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Institute of Stress Medicine, Gothenburg 41319, Sweden
Venue
ISRN Public Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-14
Volume
2012
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2090-8008 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120261890
Cited by
35
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISRN Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Council of Norway (187885/H20)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
subjective health complaints, diagnosis, general practitioners, multimorbidity, treatment guidelines, referral to psychologists, primary care, symptom-based diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review