Cited by 31Folklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesDigital Humanities and ScholarshipNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inferring Propp’s Functions from Semantically Annotated Text

Finlayson, Mark Alan·2016·Journal of American Folklore

Abstract

Vladimir Propp’s Morphology of the Folktale is a seminal work in folkloristics and a compelling subject of computational study. I demonstrate a technique for learning Propp’s functions from semantically annotated text. Fifteen folktales from Propp’s corpus were annotated for semantic roles, co-reference, temporal structure, event sentiment, and dramatis personae. I derived a set of merge rules from descriptions given by Propp. These rules, when coupled with a modified version of the model merging learning framework, reproduce Propp’s functions well. Three important function groups--namely A/a (villainy/lack), H/I (struggle and victory), and W (reward)--are identified with high accuracies. This is the first demonstration of a computational system learning a real theory of narrative structure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5406/jamerfolk.129.511.0055

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 2. ---. 1975. Russian Fairy Tales, trans. Norbert Guterman. New York: Pantheon Books.
  2. 3. Agirre, Eneko, and Philip Edmonds, eds. 2007. Word Sense Disambiguation. Dordrecht: Springer. · DOI
  3. 4. Bird, Steven, and Mark Liberman. 2001. A Formal Framework for Linguistic Annotation. Speech Communication 33(1-2):23-60. · DOI
  4. 5. Carletta, Jean. 1996. Assessing Agreement on Classification Tasks: The Kappa Statistic. Computational Linguistics 22(2):249-54.
  5. 6. Chambers, Nathanael, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2008. Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Event Chains. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 789-97, Columbus, OH.
  6. 7. ---. 2009. Unsupervised Learning of Narrative Schemas and Their Participants. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 602-10, Suntec. · DOI
  7. 8. Colby, Benjamin. 1973. A Partial Grammar of Eskimo Folktales. American Anthropologist 75(3):645-62. · DOI
  8. 9. Díaz-Agudo, Belén, Pablo Gervás, and Federico Peinado. 2004. A Case Based Reasoning Approach to Story Plot Generation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Case Based Reasoning (ECCBR), pp. 142-56, Madrid. · DOI
  9. 11. Fellbaum, Christiane, ed. 1998. Wordnet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. · DOI
  10. 12. Finlayson, Mark Alan. 2008. Collecting Semantics in the Wild: The Story Workbench. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Naturally Inspired Artificial Intelligence, pp. 46-53, Washington, DC.
  11. 13. ---. 2009. Deriving Narrative Morphologies via Analogical Story Merging. In New Frontiers in Analogy Research (Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Analogy), ed. Boris Kokinov, Keith Holyoak, and Dedre Gentner, pp. 127-36. Sofia: New Bulgarian University Press.
  12. 14. ---. 2010a. Learning Narrative Morphologies from Annotated Folktales. In Proceedings of the 1st Automated Motif Discovery in Cultural Heritage and Scientific Communication Texts (AMICUS) Workshop, pp. 99-102, Vienna.
  13. 15. ---. 2010b. The Story Workbench: An Extensible Semi-Automatic Text Annotation Tool. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies (INT-4), pp. 21-4, Stanford, CA. · DOI
  14. 17. Fischer, J. L. 1963. The Sociopsychological Analysis of Folktales. Current Anthropology 4(3):235-95. · DOI
  15. 18. Gazdar, Gerald, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey K. Pullum, and Ivan A. Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  16. 19. Gildea, Daniel, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2002. Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 28(3):245-88. · DOI
  17. 20. Goodman, Joshua. 2000. Probabilistic Feature Grammars. In Advances in Probabilistic and Other Parsing Technologies, ed. Harry Bunt and Anton Nijholt, pp. 63-84. Dordrecht: Springer. · DOI
  18. 22. Halpin, Harry, Johanna Moore, and Judy Robertson. 2004. Automatic Analysis of Plot for Story Rewriting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Experimental Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 127-33, Barcelona.
  19. 23. Hervás, Raquel, and Mark Alan Finlayson. 2010. The Prevalence of Descriptive Referring Expressions in News and Narrative. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 49-54, Uppsala.
  20. 24. Higuera, Colin de la. 2010. Grammatical Inference: Learning Automata and Grammars. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
  21. 25. Hubert, Lawrence, and Phipps Arabie. 1985. Comparing Partitions. Journal of Classification 2(1):193-218. · DOI · Paper page
  22. 27. Lehnert, Wendy G. 1981. Plot Units and Narrative Summarization. Cognitive Science 5(4):293-331. · DOI
  23. 28. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1978. Myth and Meaning. New York: Routledge. · DOI
  24. 29. Omohundro, Stephen M. 1992. Best-First Model Merging for Dynamic Learning and Recognition. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, ed. John E. Moody, Stephen J. Hanson, and Richard P. Lippmann, pp. 958-965. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  25. 30. Palmer, Martha, Paul Kingsbury, and Daniel Gildea. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 31(1):71-105. · DOI
  26. 31. Pradhan, Sameer, Kadri Hacioglu, Valerie Krugler, Wayne Ward, James H. Martin, and Daniel Jurky. 2005. Support Vector Learning for Semantic Argument Classification. Machine Learning 60(1-3):11-39. · DOI
  27. 32. Propp, Vladimir. [1928] 1968. Morphology of the Folktale (2nd edition), trans. Laurence Scott. Austin: University of Texas Press. · DOI
  28. 33. Pustejovsky, James, Jose Castano, Robert Ingria, Roser Sauri, Robert Gaizauskas, Andrea Setzer, and Graham Katz. 2003. TimeML: Robust Specification of Event and Temporal Expressions in Text. In Proceedings of Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-5), p. 193, Tilberg.
  29. 34. Regneri, Michaela, Alexander Koller, and Manfred Pinkal. 2010. Learning Script Knowledge with Web Experiments. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 979-88, Uppsala.
  30. 35. Rota, Gian-Carlo. 1964. The Number of Partitions of a Set. American Mathematical Monthly 71(5):498-504. · DOI
  31. 37. Stolcke, Andreas, and Stephen Omohundro. 1994. Inducing Probabilistic Grammars by Bayesian Model Merging. In Grammatical Inference and Applications, ed. Rafael C. Carrasco and Jose Oncina, pp. 106-18. Berlin: Springer. · DOI
  32. 38. van Rijsbergen, C. J. 1979. Evaluation. In Information Retrieval, by C. J. van Rijsbergen, pp. 112-40. London: Butterworths.
  33. 39. Young-Lai, Matthew. 2009. Grammar Inference. In Encyclopedia of Database Systems, ed. Ling Liu and M. Tamer Ozsu, pp. 1256-60. Berlin: Springer. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Finlayson, M. A.
Corresponding author
Finlayson, Mark Alan
Venue
Journal of American Folklore
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
129
Issue
511
Pages
55-77
ISSN
  • 0021-8715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1882
OpenAlex
W2332793758
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
44.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American Folklore (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
Vladimir Propp, Morphology of the Folktale, folk tales, narrative structure, semantic annotation, thematic roles, coreference, temporal structure, dramatic characters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring Propp’s Functions from Semantically Annotated Text. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5406/jamerfolk.129.511.0055
The paper
Finlayson, M. A. (2016). Inferring Propp’s Functions from Semantically Annotated Text. Journal of American Folklore. https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.129.511.0055