Cited by 12Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTreatment of Major DepressionPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk of dementia in German patients treated with antidepressants in general or psychiatric practices

Jacob, Louis, Bohlken, Jens, Kostev, Karel·2017·Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract

Aims To study the impact of the use of antidepressants on dementia in German patients with depression treated in general (GPs) or psychiatric practices (PPs). Methods Patients with a first-time documentation of depression with known severity level between 2010 and 2013 (index date) were identified by 1,126 general practitioners and 176 psychiatrists in the IMS Disease Analyzer database. We included patients between the ages of 60 and 80 years who had not previously received prescriptions for antidepressant drugs and had not been diagnosed with all-cause dementia prior to or on the index date. The main outcome of the study was the risk of dementia depending on antidepressant therapy. Cox proportional hazards models (dependent variable: incident dementia) were used to adjust for confounders and to estimate the effect of antidepressant therapy. Results A total of 22,838 patients treated in GPs and 33,112 patients treated in PPs were included in this study. Of those, 9,570, 30,321, and 16,059 individuals suffered from mild, moderate, and severe depression, respectively. Antidepressant drug use was associated with a decreased risk of dementia in patients affected by moderate (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 - 0.95) or severe depression (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73 - 0.94). Conclusion The use of antidepressants decreased dementia risk in patients with moderate or severe depression. .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5414/cp202754

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacob, L., Bohlken, J., & Kostev, K.
Venue
Int. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Published
2017-04-01
Volume
55
Issue
04
Pages
322-328
ISSN
0946-1965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561565201
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antidepressants, dementia risk, depression, incident dementia, antidepressant treatment, depression severity, older adults, general practitioners, psychiatrists, primary care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Dementia, Depression, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Databases, Factual, Risk Assessment, General Practice, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review