Cited by 32Irrigation Practices and Water ManagementWater resources management and optimizationAgricultural economics and policies

Cost-benefit analysis of almond orchard under regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) in SE Spain

Open access
García, J., Romero, P., Botía, P., García, F.·2004·Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Abstract

A cost-benefit analysis was performed for a mature, commercial almond plantation [Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb] cv. Cartagenera in SE Spain to determine profitability under regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) and an irrigation regimen covering 100% crop evapotranspiration (ETc). The plantation was subjected to two drip irrigation treatments for four years: T1 (control) — irrigation providing 100% ETc coverage throughout the growth cycle, and T2 (RDI treatment)— an irrigation strategy that provided 100% ETc except during the kernel-filling period, when only 20% ETc coverage was provided. A 28% water saving was achieved with this RDI strategy, while almond production was reduced by only 7%. RDI represented an increase in the efficiency of water use, and cost-benefit analysis showed a 10% mean annual reduction in operating costs compared to the control irrigation regimen. This reduction in costs was basically due to the 28% saving in the cost of water and the corresponding saving in electricity. RDI treatment had a greater short-term than long-term benefit per unit cost. The irrigation costs per kg of almond were 0.76 Euros kg-1 and 0.58 Euros kg-1 under RDI and control conditions respectively. The break-even point was lower under RDI; each kilogram cost 0.05 Euros less to produce than in the control conditions. The results show how RDI, and specifically how this irrigation strategy, may be considered agronomically and economically appropriate in semiarid conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5424/sjar/2004022-70

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. FERERES E., 1978. Irrigation of almonds. In: Almond or- chard management (Micke W., Kester D., eds.). Division of Agricultural Sciences, UCA, Berkeley, CA, Publ. 4092, pp. 71-76.
  2. FERERES E., 1987. Necesidades hídricas de los cultivos. Eficiencia de los métodos de aplicación y consumos to- tales de agua a nivel de parcela. Proc of the Symposium: Necesidades hídricas de los cultivos y su abastecimien- to. Madrid, 3-4 November.
  3. GIRONA J., MARSAL J., 1995. Estrategias de RDC en al- mendro. In: Riego Deficitario Controlado. Fundamentos y aplicaciones (Zapata M. and Segura P., eds.). Ed. Mun- diprensa, Madrid, pp. 99-118.
  4. GIRONA J., MATA M., MARSAL J., MIRAVETE C., 1994. Efectos acumulados de 3 años de riego deficitario con- trolado en almendro (Prunus dulcis L.). Proc of the XII Jornadas Técnicas sobre Riegos, 15-17 September, Pam- plona, Spain, Annex I, pp. 1-8.
  5. GOLDHAMER D.A., 1996b. Regulated deficit irrigation of fruit and nut trees. Proc of 7 th International Conference on Water and Irrigation, Tel Aviv, 13-16 May, pp. 152-167.
  6. KESTER D.E., ROSS N.W., 1996. History. In: Almond pro- duction manual (Micke W.C., ed.) Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, UCA, Publ.3364, Oakland, pp.171-178.
  7. KLONSKY K., BLANK S.C., 1996. Economic considera- tions. In: Almond orchard management (Micke W.C., ed.), Division of Agricultural Sciences, UCA, Publ. 4092, Ber- keley, CA, pp. 71-76.
  8. MARTIN G.C., KESTER D., 1978. Almond growth and de- velopment. In: Almond orchard management (Micke W.C., Kester D., eds). Division of Agricultural Sciences, Univ. California, Berkeley, pp. 46-51.
  9. ROMERO P., 2002. Respuesta del almendro al riego de- ficitario controlado (RDC) en condiciones de riego lo- calizado subterráneo. Doctoral thesis. Univ. Murcia, 288 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García, J., Romero, P., Botía, P., & García, F.
Affiliations
Instituto Murciano de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario y Medioambiental (ES)
Venue
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
157-165
ISSN
  • 1695-971X (ISSN-L)
  • 2171-9292
OpenAlex
W2097353954
Cited by
32
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
almond orchards, regulated deficit irrigation, cost-benefit analysis, drip irrigation, water use efficiency, irrigation costs, break-even point, semi-arid agriculture, almond, water saving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review