AI in Education: Enhancing Learning Experiences and Student Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
This research article makes an attempt to investigate the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing the learning experiences, as well as student outcomes. As a result, it has developed a study that will be able to understand how the different AI tools, including machine learning, data learning, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), automation, and so forth can be used to develop learning experiences and outcomes. Subsequently, a case study involving a mathematics classroom was used to collect data and confirm whether indeed AI led to improved learning experiences and study outcomes. The study confirms that AI resulted in positive outcome with positive performance measure sin academic performance, motivation and engagement, learning progression, and so forth.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper argues that AI tools—personalized learning, intelligent tutoring, adaptive assessment, automated grading, data analytics, and VR/AR—can improve learning experiences and student outcomes. It supports this with a literature review and a case study of an AI-powered personalized learning platform in a ninth-grade algebra class of 30 students.
Key findings
- In the case study, post-assessment scores showed a higher average grade than pre-assessment scores, which the paper interprets as improved understanding and mastery of algebraic concepts.
- The AI platform reportedly increased student engagement and motivation, with students reporting feeling more connected to the material and more positive toward mathematics.
- Students advanced through the curriculum at different paces, received targeted support for difficult concepts, and showed improved self-efficacy and confidence in solving algebraic problems.
- The paper also reports that AI-driven automated grading provided prompt feedback, enhanced teacher-student interactions, and helped students apply algebraic knowledge to real-world scenarios.
Methods
- The paper combines a literature review on AI in education with a case study of AI-powered personalized learning in a public high school.
- The case study involved a ninth-grade algebra class of 30 students; the AI platform integrated adaptive assessments, intelligent tutoring, and personalized learning pathways.
- Data collected included pre- and post-assessment scores, time spent on the platform, engagement metrics, and student feedback through surveys and focus groups; the results are reported descriptively rather than through formal statistical analysis.
Limitations
- The paper does not state limitations.
- Evident from the text: the empirical evidence comes from a single ninth-grade algebra classroom of 30 students, with no control or comparison group.
- Evident from the text: results are reported qualitatively, without effect sizes, significance tests, or detailed numerical outcomes beyond the higher average post-assessment grade.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Students demonstrated the ability to apply their algebraic knowledge to real-world scenarios.
“Students demonstrated the ability to apply their algebraic knowledge to real-world scenarios, showcasing the effectiveness of AI in promoting meaningful learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The AI-driven automated grading and feedback system provided prompt and constructive feedback to students.
“The AI-driven automated grading and feedback system provided prompt and constructive feedback to students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The AI platform's ability to track individual learning progress allowed teachers to provide targeted support and personalized interventions.
“The AI platform's ability to track individual learning progress allowed teachers to provide targeted support and personalized interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The implementation of AI-powered personalized learning yielded significant improvements in learning experiences and student outcomes in the case study.
“The implementation of AI-powered personalized learning yielded significant improvements in learning experiences and student outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
- Findingown data
Post-assessment scores indicated a higher average grade compared to pre-assessment scores.
“Post-assessment scores indicated a higher average grade compared to preassessment scores”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Students advanced through the curriculum at different paces, reflecting the flexibility of AI-generated learning pathways.
“The analysis of learning progress showed that students advanced through the curriculum at different paces, reflecting the flexibility of AI-generated learning pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Students reported feeling more capable and prepared to tackle challenging mathematical tasks.
“Students reported feeling more capable and prepared to tackle challenging mathematical tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Student self-reports of engagement, motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence accurately reflect actual learning experiences and outcomes.
- Findingown data
Personalized learning experiences boosted students' self-efficacy and confidence in solving algebraic problems.
“The study revealed that personalized learning experiences boosted students' self-efficacy and confidence in solving algebraic problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Student self-reports of engagement, motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence accurately reflect actual learning experiences and outcomes.
- Premisecitation
Students exposed to personalized learning experiences showed higher levels of achievement and a deeper understanding of concepts compared to traditional classroom instruction.
“A study by Vygotsky demonstrated that students exposed to personalized learning experiences showed higher levels of achievement and a deeper understanding of concepts compared to traditional classroom instruction [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI creates inclusive learning environments by accommodating different learning paces and abilities, ensuring that no student is left behind.
“Thirdly, AI creates inclusive learning environments by accommodating different learning paces and abilities, ensuring that no student is left behind [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI algorithms recommend learning materials and activities that align with each student's strengths and weaknesses.
“By analyzing individual performance data and learning preferences, AI algorithms recommend learning materials and activities that align with each student's strengths and weaknesses [3,4,14].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
AI-driven personalized learning contributed to better understanding and mastery of algebraic concepts.
“demonstrating that AI-driven personalized learning contributed to better understanding and mastery of algebraic concepts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
- Interpretationown data
The study finds that learning experiences can be immensely improved by implementing or using AI to improve outcome.
“Accordingly, this study finds that the learning experiences can be immensely improved by implementing or using AI to improve outcome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 30 ninth-grade algebra students in one public high school are representative enough to generalize AI's impact to education broadly.
- Premisecitation
AI improves learning outcomes by providing personalized learning paths for students that adapt to their progress and comprehension.
“Firstly, it aims to improve learning outcomes by providing personalized learning paths for students that adapt to their progress and comprehension [1].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The case study demonstrated that AI-powered personalized learning positively impacted learning experiences and student outcomes in the high school mathematics classroom.
“The case study demonstrated that AI-powered personalized learning positively impacted learning experiences and student outcomes in the high school mathematics classroom.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
- Rests on an assumption: The 30 ninth-grade algebra students in one public high school are representative enough to generalize AI's impact to education broadly.
- Premisecitation
AI enhances teaching efficiency by automating administrative tasks, such as grading and data management, allowing educators to focus on building meaningful interactions with students.
“Secondly, AI enhances teaching efficiency by automating administrative tasks, such as grading and data management, allowing educators to focus on building meaningful interactions with students [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Students using intelligent tutoring systems outperformed their peers in problem-solving assessments.
“As Roland demonstrates, students using intelligent tutoring systems outperformed their peers in problem-solving assessments, showcasing the efficacy of AI in enhancing learning outcomes [6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems deliver immediate feedback, explanations, and hints to help students overcome challenges and deepen their understanding of complex concepts.
“These systems deliver immediate feedback, explanations, and hints to help students overcome challenges and deepen their understanding of complex concepts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI-powered personalized learning experiences cater to students' unique learning needs, styles, and paces.
“AI-powered personalized learning experiences cater to students' unique learning needs, styles, and paces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Students are more engaged in their studies as they find relevance and value in the educational content.
“Consequently, students are more engaged in their studies as they find relevance and value in the educational content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems provide targeted and adaptive support to students in real-time.
“That is AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems provide targeted and adaptive support to students in real-time [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
AI is effective in promoting meaningful learning outcomes.
“showcasing the effectiveness of AI in promoting meaningful learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
- Premisecitation
Educational data analytics powered by AI offer educators comprehensive insights into student learning patterns, strengths, and areas for improvement.
“Educational data analytics powered by AI offer educators comprehensive insights into student learning patterns, strengths, and areas for improvement [12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The AI platform enhanced teacher-student interactions, as educators could focus on addressing individual needs and fostering stronger connections with students.
“This enhanced teacher-student interactions, as educators could focus on addressing individual needs and fostering stronger connections with students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 21
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStudents who struggled with specific concepts received targeted support, leading to smoother learning progress and reduced frustration.
“Students who struggled with specific concepts received targeted support, leading to smoother learning progress and reduced frustration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningStudents reported feeling more connected to the learning material, resulting in a more positive attitude towards mathematics.
“Students reported feeling more connected to the learning material, resulting in a more positive attitude towards mathematics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Student self-reports of engagement, motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence accurately reflect actual learning experiences and outcomes.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe AI platform's interactive nature and personalized content significantly increased student engagement and motivation.
“The AI platform's interactive nature and personalized content significantly increased student engagement and motivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Student self-reports of engagement, motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence accurately reflect actual learning experiences and outcomes.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe case study of mathematics students confirms that the use of AI led to improved academic performance, engagement and motivation, learning progression, timely and personalized feedback.
“The case study of mathematics students also confirms this by observing that the use of AI led to improved academic performance, engagement and motivation, learning progression, timely and personalized feedback, among others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTailoring learning materials to individual student needs leads to increased engagement, motivation, and knowledge retention.
“Researchers have found that tailoring learning materials to individual student needs leads to increased engagement, motivation, and knowledge retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntelligent tutoring systems utilizing natural language processing offered adaptive feedback and explanations, positively impacting student problem-solving skills and conceptual understanding.
“Some studies have indicated that ITS, utilizing natural language processing, offered adaptive feedback and explanations, positively impacting student problem-solving skills and conceptual understanding [6,7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents in personalized learning environments exhibited greater self-efficacy and a more positive attitude toward learning.
“Moreover, students in personalized learning environments exhibited greater self-efficacy and a more positive attitude toward learning [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI has the capability to promote learning in schools, as well as improve outcomes.
“In summary, it is evident that AI has the capability to promote learning in schools, as well as improve outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 30 ninth-grade algebra students in one public high school are representative enough to generalize AI's impact to education broadly.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI-powered adaptive assessments continually assess student progress and identify learning gaps.
“AIpowered adaptive assessments continually assess student progress and identify learning gaps.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents can explore virtual worlds, conduct experiments, and interact with simulated environments, enhancing their understanding of complex concepts.
“Students can explore virtual worlds, conduct experiments, and interact with simulated environments, enhancing their understanding of complex concepts [18].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy providing tailored content, real-time feedback, and personalized support, AI technologies contributed to improved academic performance, increased engagement, and a more positive learning environment.
“By providing tailored content, real-time feedback, and personalized support, AI technologies contributed to improved academic performance, increased engagement, and a more positive learning environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents in adaptive assessment environments showed increased confidence and willingness to tackle challenging problems, positively influencing their learning experiences and outcomes.
“Students in adaptive assessment environments showed increased confidence and willingness to tackle challenging problems, positively influencing their learning experiences and outcomes [9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVR and AR simulations enhanced students' conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills.
“For instance, Wang and Sun demonstrates that VR and AR simulations enhanced students' conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEducational data analytics is valuable in identifying at-risk students, designing personalized interventions, and optimizing learning pathways.
“Researchers such as Robinson and Jackson highlighted the value of data analytics in identifying at-risk students, designing personalized interventions, and optimizing learning pathways [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTimely feedback empowered students to make immediate improvements and reinforced their understanding of the subject matter.
“This timely feedback empowered students to make immediate improvements and reinforced their understanding of the subject matter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Student self-reports of engagement, motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence accurately reflect actual learning experiences and outcomes.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents can master topics more effectively, leading to improved academic performance and higher levels of subject mastery.
“As a result, students can master topics more effectively, leading to improved academic performance and higher levels of subject mastery [6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAR simulations exhibited deeper critical thinking skills and improved problem-solving abilities.
“In fact, AR simulations exhibited deeper critical thinking skills and improved problem-solving abilities, underlining the impact of experiential learning through immersive technologies [18].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI-powered adaptive assessments enable educators to design personalized interventions and provide additional support to students struggling in specific areas.
“This enables educators to design personalized interventions and provide additional support to students who may be struggling in specific areas [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents receive tailored support and resources that align with their individual needs, promoting academic success and fostering a sense of belonging and support within the educational community.
“As a result, students receive tailored support and resources that align with their individual needs, promoting academic success and fostering a sense of belonging and support within the educational community [17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAutomated grading saved educators time, enabling them to focus on personalized instruction and support.
“Some of the researchers indicated that automated grading saved educators time, enabling them to focus on personalized instruction and support [10,11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdaptive assessments tailored to student abilities resulted in improved performance and reduced test anxiety.
“Some of the Studies demonstrated that adaptive assessments tailored to student abilities resulted in improved performance and reduced test anxiety [7,8,9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The observed improvements in the case study are caused by the AI-powered personalized learning platform rather than other factors such as teacher effects, normal instruction, or novelty.
“The implementation of AI-powered personalized learning yielded significant improvements in learning experiences and student outcomes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 30 ninth-grade algebra students in one public high school are representative enough to generalize AI's impact to education broadly.
“The case study demonstrated that AI-powered personalized learning positively impacted learning experiences and student outcomes in the high school mathematics classroom.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Student self-reports of engagement, motivation, self-efficacy, and confidence accurately reflect actual learning experiences and outcomes.
“Students reported feeling more connected to the learning material, resulting in a more positive attitude towards mathematics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The AI platform was implemented and used as intended by all students throughout the academic year.
“An AI-powered personalized learning platform was introduced, which integrated adaptive assessments, intelligent tutoring, and personalized learning pathways.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies by Strielkowski et al. and Xu emphasize the transformative potential of AI in improving academic outcomes through adaptive learning environments.
“This aligns with previous studies, such as those by Strielkowski et al. [11] and Xu [57], which emphasize the transformative potential of AI in improving academic outcomes through adaptive learning environments.”
From Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: trends, benefits, and challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004 · see citing works
A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/8812542 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for e-learning systems
Phobun, P., & Vicheanpanya, J. (2010) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.641 · Cited by 179 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Some of the Studies demonstrated that adaptive assessments tailored to student abilities resulted in improved performance and reduced test anxiety [7,8,9].”
BackgroundA Systematic Literature Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems With Dialogue in Natural Language
Paladines, J., & Ramírez, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3021383 · Cited by 123 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Intelligent tutors use NLP to comprehend students' questions, offer explanations, and assess their understanding [16].”
BackgroundEducation, privacy, and big data algorithms: Taking the persons out of personalized learning
Regan, P. M., & Steeves, V. (2019) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v24i11.10094 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These algorithms analyze vast amounts of student data, including performance history, learning preferences, and strengths [14].”
BackgroundDesign and Research of Intelligent Tutor System Based on Natural Language Processing
Wang, Y., Sun, Y. S., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI) · doi:10.1109/csei47661.2019.8939031 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These systems can engage in natural language conversations with students, providing personalized guidance and support [8, 15].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Vygotsky, L. S., Johnson, M., & Smith, R. (2020). Personalized Learning: Enhancing Student Engagement and Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 45(3), 321-337.
- Lee, H., & Wu, T. (2019). Adaptive Assessments: Identifying Learning Gaps and Improving Performance in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Assessment, 18(1), 89-104.
- Johnson, A., & Smith, B. (2019). The Impact of Personalized Learning on Student Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in Mathematics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 201-218.
- Rolland, C., Thompson, P., & Williams, J. (2018). Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills and Conceptual Understanding in Physics Education. Computers & Education, 25(4), 567-580.
- Lee, H., & Wu, T. (2019). Adaptive Assessments: Identifying Learning Gaps and Improving Performance in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Assessment, 18(1), 89-104.
- Chen, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, L. (2020). The Impact of Adaptive Assessments on Test Anxiety and Academic Achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 211-226.
- Smith, E., & Brown, K. (2018). Automated Grading and Feedback: Enhancing Efficiency and Student Satisfaction. Journal of Educational Technology Integration, 42(1), 67-82.
- Li, M., Johnson, P., & Williams, S. (2021). Automated Grading and Student Perceptions: A Comparative Study. Journal of Educational Assessment, 29(3), 301-315.
- Robinson, D., & Jackson, L. (2019). Educational Data Analytics: Empowering Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 567-584.
- Wang, C., & Sun, Y. (2018). The Immersive Potential of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Education. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 387-401.
- Wang, J., Zhang, Q., & Liu, W. (2020). Leveraging Data Analytics for Personalized Interventions in Online Learning Environments. Computers & Education, 30(1), 89-104.
- Kim, H., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021). Augmented Reality Simulations: Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in Science Education. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 38(4), 556-570.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: trends, benefits, and challenges
Garzón, J., Patiño, E., & Marulanda, C. (2025) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti9080084 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
“This aligns with previous studies, such as those by Strielkowski et al. [11] and Xu [57], which emphasize the transformative potential of AI in improving academic outcomes through adaptive learning environments.”
Advancements in artificial intelligence transforming medical education: a comprehensive overview
Khakpaki, A. (2025) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2025.2542807 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“However, challenges such as high implementation costs and the need for technical training must also be addressed to ensure widespread adoption [72,75].”
Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. D. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14070742 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“Additionally, similar studies by Jian [66] and Xu [67] have shown that AI tools can enhance classroom engagement and facilitate personalised learning when effectively integrated.”
Jeilani, A., & Abubakar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1548900 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Guizani, S., Mazhar, T., Shahzad, T., Ahmad, W., Bibi, A., & Hamam, H. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00424-7 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“AI algorithms can analyse a student’s past performance on assignments and tests, allowing for the provision of personalized recommendations to assist the student in realizing their maximum potential [88].”
Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes
Sasikala, P., & Ravichandran, R. (2024) · Journal of Digital Learning and Education · doi:10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1234 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“AI technologies, including machine learning, virtual reality, and intelligent tutoring systems, have been shown to enhance academic performance, motivation, and engagement (Xu, 2024; Suntharalingam, 2024).”
BackgroundKayyali, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2373-0.ch007 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Sustainable Innovation: Harnessing AI and Living Intelligence to Transform Higher Education
Allam, H., Gyamfi, B. K., & AlOmar, B. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040398 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“AI-powered systems can provide continuous, personalized student support by predicting individual learning needs and proactively addressing academic challenges (Nimbalagundi et al., 2024; Xu, 2024).”
Younas, M., El-Dakhs, D., & Noor, U. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1689205 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Ahmad, W., Shokeen, R., & Raj, R. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5538-1.ch017 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Kayaalp, F., Durnalı, M., & GÖKBULUT, B. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12865 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
AI'S Impact on Vocational Training and Employability: Innovation, Challenges, and Perspectives
-, R. E. (2024) · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.24967 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Virtual reality may provide immersive, hands-on training that simulates real-world events, improving practical skills and preparation for genuine job contexts [34].”
BackgroundMalik, I. A., Adem, S. A., & Rasool, A. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2546126 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Academicians and researchers acknowledge the potential of EdAI to enhance learning outcomes by providing personalized instructions and data-driven learning insights (Xu, 2024).”
Isaifan, R. J., & Hasna, M. O. (2025) · Quality in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13538322.2025.2576326 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…reported opportunities and applications of using AI in higher education institutions as shown in Table 1, AI-driven systems can analyse huge datasets of student performance, providing educators with real-time insights to tailor instructional strategies and enhance student engagement (Xu, 2024).”
Generative AI-Based Tutoring for Enhancing Learning Engagement and Achievement
Belawati, T., & Prasetyo, D. (2025) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.902 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Enhancing Education and Well-Being Through Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges
Qasmi, F., & Fatima, S. K. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65996-6_13 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Avsec, S., & Rupnik, D. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13070562 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wen, Q., Wang, J., Guo, Z., & Bădulescu, D. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15121649 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…Najmiddinova, 2024), etc. Previous studies have also shed light on how Gen-AI in education and academia enhances social development among students and teachers by fostering collaboration, communication skills, and self-esteem through adaptive, game-like activities (Grace et al., 2023; Z. Xu, 2024).”
Mission, R. S., Fio, R. J., & Mission, A. R. (2024) · Journal of innovative technology convergence. · doi:10.69478/jitc2024v6n4a06 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Personalized Learning and Student Engagement
Babu, C. V. S., Yuvansankar, M., & Tharuneshwaran, K. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7195-4.ch004 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Alsswey, A. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105190 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
AI literacy as a key driver of user experience in AI-powered assessment: insights from Socratic mind
Soylu, M. Y., Lee, J., Hung, J.-T., Cui, C., & Joyner, D. A. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2564739 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Research suggests that students with higher AI literacy may engage more productively, calibrate trust in AI feedback, and navigate AI-mediated tasks with greater confidence, whereas those with lower literacy may struggle to realize the same benefits (Walter, 2024; Xu, 2024).”
Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Media Education
Jha, A., & Singh, S. R. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1017-6.ch010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mariñas, K. A., Saflor, C. S., Alvarado, P., Uminga, J. M., & Verde, N. A. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100435 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence integration and teachers’ self-efficacy in physics classrooms
Yehya, F. M., ElSayary, A., Murshidi, G. H. A., & Zaabi, A. A. (2025) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/16660 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Tariq, M. U. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4576-5.ch002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Virtual Reality: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
Wang, Y., Guizani, M., & Hossain, M. S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3769090 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Amer, F. G. M., Alanazi, M. A., Shaban, M., Abdelgawad, M. E., Mohammed, H. H., Hassan, S., Atrous, M. H., Ibrahim, S. S. M., Mohamed, A. H., & Sabek, E. M. (2025) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70056 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Alqarni, O. M., Curle, S. M., Mahdi, H. S., & Ali, J. K. M. (2024) · Forum for Linguistic Studies · doi:10.30564/fls.v6i5.6975 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“It supports personalized learning paths, adaptive assessments, and real-time feedback, which contribute to heightened student engagement and academic performance [30, 31] .”
Lamrabet, M. (2025) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.4.2277 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Specifically, these analyses demonstrated that both future and experienced teachers with satisfactory knowledge of AI-based tools tend to perceive these tools positively and are motivated to integrate them into their teaching practices from the initial stages of their careers [71–73].”
AI-Enabled Learning Ecosystems
Hari, S. S., Rajashree, R. H., Dharani, J., & Santhiya, C. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8292-9.ch008 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Tressyalina, T., Ghaluh, B. M., Wulandari, E., Arief, E., & Noveria, E. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2504062 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Such discussions can be enriched by analyzing AI-generated interpretations of texts and videos, encouraging students to critically evaluate technological outputs and their societal implications (Xu, 2024).”
The Role of AI-Powered Learning Analytics in Enhancing Student Engagement and Performance
Tariq, M. U. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2185-1.ch005 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Khojasteh, L., Karimian, Z., Nasiri, E., Kafipour, R., & Farahmandi, A. Y. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08288-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“AI tools, while enhancing writing quality and efficiency, can blur the lines between students’ original work and AI-assisted content, raising questions about the authenticity of academic writing [9].”
Hwang, W., Nguyen, T.-R.-G., & Shadiev, R. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70208 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Education: Innovations, Opportunities, and Challenges
Cardona, M., Cáceres, C., Cáceres, A., & Aldana-Aguilar, J. (2024) · IEEE Central America and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN) · doi:10.1109/concapan63470.2024.10933829 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Intelligent tutoring systems, such as Knewton, adapt the material and teaching pace according to individual needs [14].”
Faculty AI literacy in higher education systems: a systematic review and future-adaptive framework
Wu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2648739 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AI-Driven Transformation of Higher Education a Systematic Review
Erlangga, A. P. D., & Magdalena, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit65724.2025.11167254 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The increasing of AI implementation enables higher education institutions to find creative and innovative approaches to improve students engagement, personalize learning experiences, and streamline operations [2].”
Basic sciences are non-negotiable: debunking three critical fallacies in engineering education
Guerra, J., & Meneses-La-Riva, M. E. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1600009 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zhang, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1595818 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“AI-driven learning platforms can enhance learner immersion through continuous interaction with students (Xu, 2024).”
Rahman, M. H., Islam, M. M., Islam, M. N., & Nasiruzzaman, M. (2026) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-04-2025-0159 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Park, E. K. (2026) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2026.2619983 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Their intention to engage with tools can be affected by the comprehensive and complex interplay of cognitive, psychological, environmental, and technological communication (Z. Xu 2024).”
Artificial intelligence as a reflexive collaborator in graduate studies supervision
Brown, A., & Rossouw, J. (2026) · Transformation in Higher Education · doi:10.4102/the.v11i0.657 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Asanre, A. A., Oguntola, J. I., Ramatea, M. A., & Lawani, A. O. (2026) · European Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.20897/ejsteme/18268 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Similarly, Yeh et al. (2019), Szabo et al. (2020), Xu (2024), and Zaman (2023) documented that AI-supported learning environments strengthen both immediate understanding and long-term retention.”
Ullah, R. S., Asghar, A., Ali, M. I., & Jan, R. (2024) · Review of Education Administration and Law · doi:10.47067/real.v7i4.393 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Transforming Personalized Learning With Artificial Intelligence
Revathy, J. S., M., R., S., A. M., & G., M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8292-9.ch014 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Incorporating AI in Educational Leadership
Ruheili, H. A., & Al-Buraiki, S. A. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7863-2.ch009 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Empowering Students With Disabilities in Education Through AI-Driven Approaches
Bhimavarapu, U. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1000-8.ch006 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pesovski, I., Jolakoski, P., Trajkovik, V., Kubincová, Z., & Herzog, M. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100430 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Moore, S., Jackson, L. E., Kwon, C., & Stamper, J. C. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03870-8_25 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mansoor, H. S., Sumardjoko, B., & Sutopo, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1719955 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Integration of AI in education, increases student engagement through customized learning, improves learning outcomes, and saves time (Xu, 2024).”
Integrating AI Education Strategies for Future-Proofing Curriculum Design in Omani Universities
Awashreh, R. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2752-5.ch008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Designing Inclusive Education With AI-Driven Pedagogies and Learning Analytics
Alam, A. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5188-9.ch004 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
MRAYYAN, M. T., & Alomari, A. K. (2026) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/9885653 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence enabled smart education systems
Sharma, A. K., & Kumar, T. V. V. (2026) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-026-03196-x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Pum, M., Heng, K., & Sok, S. (2026) · Open Praxis · doi:10.55982/openpraxis.18.3.1047 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sri, S. S., Rajitha, K., Muraleedharan, D., Premkishor, S. K., Elakki, R. T., & Prabhakaran, S. (2025) · Journal of Ecohumanism · doi:10.62754/joe.v4i1.6042 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Additionally, concerns around data privacy and the ethical use of AI in student assessments have been raised, with critics arguing that overreliance on AI may depersonalize education (Xu, Z., 2024).”
Designing an AI Expert of Educational Programmes in Higher Education
Davlatova, M., Shalom, K., & Kobtseva, A. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158591 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“The active implementation of AI technologies leads to new opportunities for the automation of expertise, the reduction of time and financial costs, and the enhancement of objectivity in assessments [12].”
Ndjama, J. D. N., & Westhuizen, J. V. D. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9989-7.ch005 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Students' Learning Math With the Aid of AI and the Need of Shifting Classroom Instructions
Jackaria, P. M., Sali, A.-A. G., Alvarado, H. A. L., Jiripa, R. H. M., & Sahijuan, A.-S. Y. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0847-0.ch002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Teaching the Past With the Future
Şahin, A. N. E. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2612-2.ch008 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Classroom Engagement through Real-time Student Attention Analysis using YOLO V8
Goh, M. L. I., Juanatas, I. C., Juanatas, R. A., et al. (2025) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e65071.2025.11075414 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“One study evaluated AI-based systems in classrooms and demonstrated that real-time monitoring helps educators assess student engagement levels and adapt their teaching strategies accordingly [4].”
Liu, F., Chen, F., Teng, Y., Dai, Q., Wang, Q., Shen, J., & Zhao, L. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-0017-8_35 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Das, P., Harshan, Harsha, C., Suman, H. K., & Giri, A. (2025) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e65071.2025.11075412 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The potential benefits of Generative AI in education are further demonstrated by Xu, Zhiyi (2024) [11], which discusses how AI can enhance learning experiences and student outcomes by enabling personalized skill development and upskilling.”
Redefining the Role of Educators, Not Replacing Them
Terantino, J., Zaheer, S., & Zhu, Y. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0396-3.ch009 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nguyen, Q. N., & Hue, D. D. T. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1636777 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“One recent review by Xu (2024) highlights numerous instances where AI-driven systems improved learning outcomes.”
MacLennan, H., Malka, S. C., & Queiroz, H. J. D. S. D. (2025) · SAM Advanced Management Journal · doi:10.1108/samamj-04-2025-0023 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“How about our stance?”: college students’ stance on using artificial intelligence educational tools
Bringula, R. P., Trillanes, A. O., & Catacutan-Bangit, A. E. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13859-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Al-sendy, A. M. A., Jameel, S. Z. M., Al-Shmam, M. A., Riyadh, H. A., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-12-2024-0820 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Altan, B. A., & Kabaran, G. G. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13871-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Adoption of Gemini AI to Enhance Student Learning
Prakash, V., Ebinraj, A. C., & Appukuttan, S. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7526-5_43 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ma, R., & Guo, M. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16040577 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Similarly, Xu’s study shows that in AI-enhanced learning environments, students with higher AI literacy can navigate complex AI tools, interpret algorithmic outputs, and personalize learning experiences (Xu, 2024).”
A Study on EduTainment: Enhancing Learning Activity in Science Learning
Susilowaty, A. K., Nugraha, N., & Hartono, Y. (2026) · Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE) · doi:10.37251/jee.v7i2.2656 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Pham, T., & Ngo, T. T. A. (2026) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2026.100344 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Polinar, M. A. N., Mahipos, A. M. N., Rabanes, B. G., & Ato, J. M. U. (2025) · Diversitas Journal · doi:10.48017/dj.v10i2.3345 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ren, Y., Ren, J., Chen, Y., & Liu, Q. (2025) · Frontiers of Digital Education · doi:10.1007/s44366-025-0065-8 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“AI tailors learning paths to individual student needs, provides real-time feedback (Xu, 2024), optimizes teaching content, and enables objective assessment.”
AI Educational Support Framework for At-Risk Media Students
Assad, A. (2025) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e65071.2025.11075419 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“In addition, the AI tools reduce the gap between at-risk and other students and enhance their motivation and learning satisfaction [7].”
Pedro, J. R. S., & Ting, F. S. T. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8835102/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AI Usage as a Mediator Between Study Habits, Academic Procrastination, and Academic Self-EsteemPreprint
Chakraborty, D., & Subramani, D. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9043305/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Doğum Şekli ve Doğum Korkusuna Etki Eden Faktörler
Güven, N., & Doğan, R. A. (2024) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub528.c2147
Integrating Text Analysis and LLM to Explore the Development and Application of AIGC in Education
Wang, S.-M., & Wu, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) · doi:10.1109/ictc62082.2024.10826827
Malka, S. C., MacLennan, H., & Queiroz, H. D. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5108051
Inclusive Curriculum Development and Implementation in Zimbabwe
Chidindi, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66870-8_5
Kim, D. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Academics · doi:10.1177/1932202x251321544
“Arti fi cial intelligence is automating routine tasks while amplifying the demand for higher-order thinking, adaptability, and lifelong learning (Xu, 2024).”
Virtual Tutor: AI-Powered Learning Platform
Kushwaha, R. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.70698
Hegazy, A. Z. (2025) · International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies · doi:10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.7049
“Similarly, it was underlined by Jian [42] and Xu [43] that AI tools like ChatGPT would improve classroom interaction, with productivity and overall learning reaching their maximum when efficiently inculcated.”
InfluentialHasheela, V., Haponnen, A., & Tuape, M. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174802366.64034276/v1
Design and Evaluation of an Adaptive VLE for a Flipped Classroom Emergency Care course
Gouifrane, R., Lajane, H., Arai, M., et al. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0740-4.ch010
Malka, S. C., MacLennan, H., & Queiroz, H. J. D. S. D. (2025) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v25i2.7669
Al-Modafar, F. A. (2025) · International Journal of Education and Practice · doi:10.18488/61.v13i3.4268
Alhazzani, N. S. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22205-3_21 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Dey, S. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5102-5.ch003
Enhancing Active Learning in Education Through ChatGPT and Concept Maps: A Case Study
Schicchi, D., & Taibi, D. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94002-6_1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Angwaomaodoko, E. A. (2025) · Path of Science · doi:10.22178/pos.120-27
Antony, M. K., Pradana, S. P., Ramadhan, A. N., Dewiyeti, S., & Hidayati, E. (2025) · Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11004 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Through this approach, students are encouraged to take an active role in inquiry-based learning, which enhances both their conceptual understanding and higher-order thinking skills (Harry, 2023; Favero, 2024; Xu, 2024).”
Cognitive AI’s Transformative Impact on Self-Regulated Learning in eLearning Environments
Hadyaoui, A., Cheniti‐Belcadhi, L., & Mitwally, M. A. A. (2025) · Future education and learning spaces · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7937-9_2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AI-Based Pattern Recognition Model for Enhancing Student Engagement and Supporting Academic PlanningPreprint
Bao, H. G. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7644175/v1
AI-Based Pattern Recognition Model for Enhancing Student Engagement and Supporting Academic Planning
Bao, H. G., & Đại, N. V. (2025) · Seminars in Medical Writing and Education · doi:10.56294/mw2025846 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Harnessing Project-Based and Experiential Learning for Competency-Driven Education
Ramaila, S. M. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3566-7.ch004
Enhancing Learning Experiences Using Artificial Intelligence Technology in Education
Rajagopal, S., Deevi, D., Ranjna, et al. (2025) · International Conference on New Frontiers in Communication, Automation, Management and Security (ICCAMS) · doi:10.1109/iccams65118.2025.11234168
“Artificial intelligence (AI) has lately changed the regulations in several areas, including teaching, by altering demand and learning centre plans [1–5].”
- Authors
- Xu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Zhiyi
- Venue
- Applied and Computational Engineering
- Publisher
- EWA Publishing
- Published
- 2024-03-25
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 104-111
- ISSN
- 2755-2721 (ISSN-L)
- 2755-273X
- OpenAlex
- W4393089565
- Semantic Scholar
- 11c88602d4f73937d2fe6456088dee04dd189914
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 14
- FWCI
- 56.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Applied and Computational Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, learning experience, student outcomes, machine learning, virtual reality, augmented reality, educational automation, mathematics education, academic performance, student motivation, student engagement, learning progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
