The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Telework and health effects review
Open accessAbstract
Telework is an increasingly popular flexible working arrangement. The aim of this article is to describe the features that characterize telework. The advantages and disadvantages of teleworking are outlined, as well as its effects on the health of the worker. The method used was a literature review. The outputs of this search show that in general, empirical evidence favours a positive association between telework and worker health. However, there are also negative impacts on health such as stress and depression. The overall conclusion is that telework is likely to yield more good than bad for individual health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
Psychological Stress and Disease
Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.14.1685 · Cited by 3,168
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 · Cited by 2,616
Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju032 · Cited by 1,991
Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.80.1.6 · Cited by 1,866
A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work
Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.144 · Cited by 1,604
Hill, E. J., Ferris, M., & Märtinson, V. (2003) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0001-8791(03)00042-3 · Cited by 635
Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers
Baruch, Y. (2000) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/1468-005x.00063 · Cited by 579
Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., & Spurgeon, P. C. (2013) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-08-2012-0059 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Working from home in the time of Covid-19: how to best preserve occupational health?
Bouziri, H., Smith, D. R. M., Descatha, A., Dab, W., & Jean, K. (2020) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2020-106599 · Cited by 297
COVID-19 and employees’ mental health: stressors, moderators and agenda for organizational actions
Hamouche, S. (2020) · Emerald Open Research · doi:10.35241/emeraldopenres.13550.1 · Cited by 303
Wöhrmann, A. M., & Ebner, C. (2021) · New Technology Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12208 · Cited by 158
Niebuhr, F., Borle, P., Börner-Zobel, F., & Voelter-Mahlknecht, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031122 · Cited by 155
Hall, C. E., Davidson, L., Brooks, S. K., Greenberg, N., & Weston, D. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01221-3 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Tavares, A. I.
- Venue
- International Journal of Healthcare
- Publisher
- Sciedu Press
- Published
- 2017-07-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 30
- ISSN
- 2377-7338 (ISSN-L)
- 2377-7346
- OpenAlex
- W2735968145
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Telework and health effects review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30
- The paper
- Tavares, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
