Preservice Teachers’ Mentorship Experiences during Teaching Practice in a South African Teacher Preparation Program
Open accessAbstract
Mentor teachers are instrumental in teacher preparation programs during the teaching practice of preservice teachers that involves mentor-mentee relationships. This qualitative paper reports on the mentoring experiences of preservice teachers during eight weeks of teaching practice in 2020 using Gibbs’ experimental learning as a conceptual framework. Forty-five preservice teachers participated in a reflective exercise, sharing their stories through reflective essays guided by open-ended questions. A thematic approach was used in data analysis. Findings indicated that mentors’ experiences and personal characteristics, and abilities to create opportunities for growth influenced the preservice teachers’ experiences during teaching practice. The mentees’ perceptions toward mentor-mentee relationships also influenced their experience. Based on the findings, it is important to upskill mentors to equip them with professional and mentorship ethics to enable preservice teachers to acquire the requisite skills that will better prepare them as future professional teachers. The findings of this study can be useful in the process of developing professional development of mentors prior to teaching practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers agree that mentor teachers need to be trained in effective mentoring techniques to enhance their competency in mentoring pre-service teachers.
“Researchers agree that mentor teachers need to be trained in effective mentoring techniques to enhance their competency in mentoring pre-service teachers [14,31,58,68].”
From Are Pre-Service Teachers Receiving Quality Mentoring in Rural Schools? A Synopsis from Research in South Africa (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Forming the mentor-mentee relationship
Hudson, P. (2016) · Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning · doi:10.1080/13611267.2016.1163637 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Department of Education Management, P. A. C. E., Letuma, M. C., Dlamini, M. E., & Department of Curriculum Studies and Higher Education, U. O. F. S. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Management & Development Studies · doi:10.53378/ijemds.353284 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Tsoka, M., Runhare, T., Machisi, E., & Magosha, T. A. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5020037
“Most studies indicate that the most common mentoring approach used by teachers in rural schools is the traditional dyadic approach, often referred to as the apprentice-ship model [6,14,15,31–34].”
Maraisa, E., & Botha, C. (2025) · African Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.21083/ajote.v14i2.8472
- Authors
- Jita, T., & Munje, P. N.
- Affiliations
- University of the Free State (ZA)
- Venue
- International Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Sciedu Press
- Published
- 2021-08-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 140
- ISSN
- 1927-6044 (ISSN-L)
- 1927-6052
- OpenAlex
- W3195243950
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- pre-service teachers, mentoring, mentoring relationships, teaching practice, teacher education curriculum, reflective practice, mentor professional development, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review