The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Quality Higher Education in Nigeria: The Roles of Stakeholders
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses the roles of stakeholders in improving quality of university education in Nigeria. Internal and external stakeholders are identified and the various roles they could play in improving the quality of university education are discussed. The paper contends that continuous and holistic improvement in university education system requires the collaborative efforts of various stakeholders both internal and external. Collaboration will help to trigger improvement in university education system. Such collaboration could be achieved through universities establishing a close link or relationship with employers of labour and other external stakeholders such other educational institutions, non-governmental organizations, private sectors. Universities can also collaborate with firms/industries by utilization of their technologies and expertise to influence improvement through staff training. Thus, quality can only be attained in university education through cost sharing among stakeholders such as government, universities and public/private sector. University administrators and university board management committee could ensure continuous improvement in university education system by ensuring constant training and retraining of teachers and other staff via professional development programmes of high quality. In this way, excellence and high standards is attainable in university education systems in the country.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Issues such as weak curriculum flexibility, inadequate technological infrastructure, shortages of specialized academic personnel, limited practical forensic facilities, and poor collaboration among universities, regulatory agencies, professional accounting bodies, anti-corruption institutions, employers, and industry practitioners continue to constrain systematic curriculum development in forensic”
From Curriculum Gaps and Institutional Challenges in Forensic Accounting Education in Nigerian Universities (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Patrick Edet, A. (2026) · International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.59256/ijrtmr.20260604032
Metadata
- Authors
- Asiyai, R. I.
- Affiliations
- Delta State University (NG)
- Corresponding author
- Asiyai, Romina Ifeoma
- Venue
- International Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Sciedu Press
- Published
- 2014-12-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1927-6044 (ISSN-L)
- 1927-6052
- OpenAlex
- W2154599952
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › African Education and Politics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
- Keywords
- higher education quality, stakeholder roles, university education, internal and external stakeholders, university-industry collaboration, employer partnerships, cost sharing, teacher professional development, employee training, university governance, Nigeria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Quality Higher Education in Nigeria: The Roles of Stakeholders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p61
- The paper
- Asiyai, R. I. (2014). Improving Quality Higher Education in Nigeria: The Roles of Stakeholders. International Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.