Cited by 17Occupational Health and BurnoutWorkplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Working community-related interaction factors building occupational well-being-learning based intervention in Finnish and Estonian schools (2010-2013)

Open access
Laine, Sari, Saaranen, Terhi, Pertel, Tiia, Hansen, Siivi, Lepp, Kadi, Liiv, Krystiine, Tossavainen, Kerttu·2018·International Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

This article examines whether a three-year learning-based work community intervention resulted in changes in working community-related interaction factors and occupational well-being among Finnish and Estonian school staff. It reports the types of changes in working community-related interaction factors and their associations to the subjective occupational well-being and general occupational well-being of the working community. The initial quantitative survey data were collected in Finland (n = 486) and Estonia (n = 1330) in 2010 using the “Well-being at your work index questionnaire.” The same measurement tool was used in 2013 to collect final survey data from school staff members in Finland (n = 545) and Estonia (n = 974). The data were analyzed statistically with percent, mean, SD, Mann-Whitney test, sum variables, one-way analysis of variance and Spearman’s correlation. Changes were detected in factors related to working community interaction; in particular, statistically significant changes in work management and time use were detected in Finnish schools. Working atmosphere and appreciation of others’ work, cooperation and information, and work management and time use were associated to both the subjective occupational well-being and general occupational well-being of the working community. Schools should plan and implement development activities to promote the subjective occupational well-being and general working community occupational well-being. Development work should focus on working community-related interaction, such as trust between workers. Principals should draw particular attention to principal–subordinate relationships and to providing information about changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5430/ijhe.v7n2p1

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only 17 studies used scales dedicated to TWB with an explicit relation of items or scales to the tasks of the teaching profession.

    “Regarding quantitative research, only 17 studies used scales that were dedicated to TWB with an explicit relation of items or scales to the tasks of the teaching profession, such as instruction, interaction with students and parents, collaboration with other teachers, or cooperation with the principal (e.g., Collie, Shapka, Perry, & Martin, 2015, 2016;Cook et al., 2017;Laine et al., 2018;Mankin,”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. v7n7p96 · DOI
  2. v7n13p40 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laine, S., Saaranen, T., Pertel, T., Hansen, S., Lepp, K., Liiv, K., & Tossavainen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • National Institute for Health Development (EE)
Corresponding author
Laine, Sari
Venue
International Journal of Higher Education
Publisher
Sciedu Press
Published
2018-02-09
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 1927-6044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1927-6052
OpenAlex
W2787175182
Cited by
17
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Työsuojelurahasto
  • OLVI-Säätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
employee well-being, work community, school staff, work management, time use, organizational climate, Finland, Estonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review