The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensory Evaluation as a Tool in Determining Acceptability of Innovative Products Developed by Undergraduate Students in Food Science and Technology at The University of Trinidad and Tobago
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses the comprehensive and practical training that was delivered to students in a university classroomon how sensory evaluation can be used to determine acceptability of food products. The report presents how studentsused their training on sensory evaluation methods and analysis and applied it to improving and predicting acceptabilityof new innovative products that they developed. Students were exposed to and trained on performing some of the majorsensory test methods, including discrimination, descriptive, and affective tests. They were also exposed to exerciseswhich involved them physically setting up a test area, presenting samples that were coded and properly displayed,collating data from sensory evaluation questionnaires, statistical analysis of data collated and the use of the results ofthe analysis to make decisions on product acceptability and improvement. Students successfully applied their trainingand were able to not only get feedback on the specific food characteristics of their products that could be improved butwere also able to conclude that the products they presented to the panelists were acceptable and that the panelists had ahighly positive attitude towards eating the products and even purchasing if these were to become available in themarket. Since appropriate statistical analysis was applied for the different sensory evaluation methods used for each ofthe different products, valid information and conclusions that can prove product quality and acceptability was gatheredand can be presented to any product development and marketing departments in any food and beverage company thatmay wish to adopt and produce these products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Consumer attention to the food labels, certification, list of ingredients and country of origin affects upcycled food acceptance [60,75].”
From Challenges for Upcycled Foods: Definition, Inclusion in the Food Waste Management Hierarchy and Public Acceptability (2021) · cites this paper as [75]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Avsar, Y.K., Karagul-Yuceer, Y., Drake, M.A., Singh, T.K., Yoon, Y., & Cadwallader, K.R. (2004). Characterization of nutty flavor in Cheddar cheese. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 1999-2010. http://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/6688988/characterization-of-nutty-flavor-in-cheddar-cheese-north-c
- arolina- Claassen, M.R., & Lawless, H.T. (1992). A comparison of descriptive terminology systems for the sensory analysis of flavor defects in milk. Journal of Food Science, 57, 596-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb08051.x · DOI
- Diary Management Inc. (2005). Innovations in Diary, Diary Industry Technical Review. Rosemount, IL 60018-5616. Retrieved from http://www.innovatewithdairy.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/DMI2262SensoryBulletin.pdf
- Grunert, K.G., & Harmsen, H. (1997). Determinants of Food Industry Innovation, Structural Change in the European Food Industries. In: Final Seminar Proceedings. Ed. Traill B., University of Reading.
- Kerry, J., Kerry, J., & Ledward, D. (2002). Meat processing: Improving Quality (p 189). Cambridge, England: CRC Press Inc.
- Lawless, H.T., & Klein, B.P. (1989). Academic vs Industrial Perspective on Sensory Evaluation. Journal of Sensory Studies, 3, 205-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1989.tb00445.x · DOI
- A.A. Williams & R.K. Atkins, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp. 448-66.
- Meilegaard, M.C., Civille, G.V., & Carr, B.T. (1991). Sensory Evaluation Techniques. Ed. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 1-23.
- Meilgaard, M.C., Carr, T., & Civille, G. (1999). Sensory Evaluation Techniques (3 rd ed.) New York: CRC Press Inc.
- Meiselman, H. L., Mastroianni, G., Buller, M., & Edwards, J. (1999). Longitudinal measurement of three eating behavior scales during a period of change. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00013-5 · DOI
- Sidel, J.L., & Stone, H. (1993). The role of sensory evaluation in the food industry. Food Quality & Preference, 4, 65-73. San Diego: Academic Press.
- Van Trijp, H.C.M., & Schifferstein, H.N.J. (1995). Sensory analysis in marketing practice: comparison and integration. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10, 127-47.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moshtaghian, H., Bolton, K., & Rousta, K. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10112874 · Cited by 150
“Intrinsic cues are used in food sensory evaluation [74], and some studies have developed an upcycled food product to assess its intrinsic cues such as appearance and colour [8,56–58].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh-Ackbarali, D., & Maharaj, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Trinidad and Tobago (TT)
- Venue
- Journal of Curriculum and Teaching
- Publisher
- Sciedu Press
- Published
- 2014-01-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1927-2677 (ISSN-L)
- 1927-2685
- OpenAlex
- W2118065007
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Curriculum and Teaching (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- sensory evaluation, food acceptance, innovative food products, descriptive sensory analysis, product development, sensory data analysis, food marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review