Cited by 7Seed Germination and PhysiologyAgricultural Engineering and MechanizationSeedling growth and survival studies

Método de colheita e superação de dormência na qualidade fisiológica de sementes de Cassia ferruginea

Open access
Martins, Cibele Chalita, Machado, Carla Gomes, Martinelli-Seneme, Adriana, Zucareli, Claudemir·2012·Semina: Ciências Agrárias

Abstract

The harvesting method of fruits of tree species should be adequate to obtain seeds of maximum physiological quality. When present, the dormancy of Cassia ferruginea seeds is due to seed coat impermeability to water. This research work viewed to find the best methods both for the harvesting and for the breaking of dormancy of seeds of that species. The experiment was conducted during two years. In the first, fruits shed from the mother plant and laying on the ground were picked and their seeds submitted to the following treatments: 1. control, 2. mechanical scarification of the seeds with sandpaper no. 220, 3. hot water for 5 minutes (initial and final temperatures of 82 and 69 ºC, respectively), 4. hot water for 15 minutes (initial and final temperatures of 82 and 51 ºC, respectively), 5. chemical scarification with H2SO4 (95%) for 20, 30, 40, 50. 60, 70, and 80 minutes. In the second year, seeds were submitted to treatments 2, 3, and 4 whereas acid scarification was applied for 30, 45, and 60 minutes. The results showed that seeds picked from the ground and those taken directly from the mother plant differ in their response to the dormancy breaking procedure. The results also showed that the seeds picked from the ground are better than those harvested directly from the plant and that, when dormant, the best results are attained when seeds are either submitted to mechanical scarification or chemical scarification with sulfuric acid for periods between 30 and 60 minutes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p491

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martins, C. C., Machado, C. G., Martinelli-Seneme, A., & Zucareli, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Goiás (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR)
Venue
Semina: Ciências Agrárias
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
491-498
ISSN
  • 1676-546X (ISSN-L)
  • 1679-0359
OpenAlex
W1460411667
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Semina Ciências Agrárias (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Seed Germination and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Seedling growth and survival studies
Keywords
seed dormancy, dormancy breaking, seed harvesting, seed coat impermeability, mechanical scarification, hot water treatment, sulfuric acid scarification, seed physiological quality, fruit harvest timing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review