The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alternatives to Autogenous Bone Graft: Efficacy and Indications
Abstract
Bone grafting is frequently used to augment bone healing with the numerous approaches to reconstructing or replacing skeletal defects. Autologous cancellous bone graft remains the most effective grafting material because it provides the three elements required for bone regeneration: osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteogenic cells. Autologous cortical bone graft provides these three components to a limited extent as well and also provides the structural integrity important in reconstruction of larger defects. However, because autogenous grafting is associated with several shortcomings and complications, including limited quantities of bone for harvest and donor-site morbidity, alternatives have been used in a wide range of orthopaedic pathologic conditions. Grafting substitutes currently available include cancellous and cortical allograft bone, ceramics, demineralized bone matrix, bone marrow, and composite grafts. No single alternative graft material provides all three components for bone regeneration. The clinical applications for each type of material are dictated by its particular structural and biochemical properties. Composite grafts consisting of several materials are often used to maximize bone healing, especially where the grafting site is compromised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Giannoudis, P. V., Dinopoulos, H., & Tsiridis, E. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 · Cited by 2,078
Cheng, C. W., Solorio, L. D., & Alsberg, E. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.012 · Cited by 358
Dallari, D., Savarino, L., Stagni, C., Cenni, E., Cenacchi, A., Fornasari, P. M., Albisinni, U., Rimondi, E., Baldini, N., & Giunti, A. (2007) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.01026 · Cited by 182
Exosomes to exosome-functionalized scaffolds: a novel approach to stimulate bone regeneration
Deng, L., Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Lai, S., Yang, Q., Mu, Y., & Dong, M. (2024) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-024-04024-4 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Gazdag, A. R., Lane, J. M., Glaser, D., & Forster, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1067-151X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161845595
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.