Modeling Private and Business Travelers in an Agent-Based Travel Demand Model
Open accessAbstract
Worldwide travel and tourism are becoming increasingly important, and travelers have hence an increasing influence on traffic volume in cities. Therefore, it is important to incorporate them in future transport planning activities and to consider them in travel demand modeling. Until now, there has been no suitable model that differentiates between travelers and inhabitants and considers the different travel behavior of these two groups. This paper presents a framework that includes different types of travelers (business/private, overnight/same day) in a microscopic travel demand model. The application of the model to the planning area of Hamburg provides evidence that tourists are responsible for about 7% of Hamburg’s traffic volume. A more detailed analysis, however, reveals differences (e.g., in the number of trips, mode choice and trip length) for all different traveler types and compared to inhabitants. Overall, the results obtained enhance knowledge and are hence beneficial for planning authorities.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper presents touriTopp, an extension of the agent-based travel demand model mobiTopp that integrates private and business travelers, both overnight and same-day, into a microscopic simulation. Applied to Hamburg, it finds that tourists account for about 7% of the city’s traffic volume and that traveler types differ from residents and from each other in trips, mode choice, distances, and activities.
Key findings
- In the Hamburg application, tourists account for about 7% of Hamburg’s traffic volume, or 7% of all trips within Hamburg.
- The simulation modeled 1.87 million residents plus 694,026 travel agents, with some agents representing whole travel groups.
- Overnight business travelers averaged 3.7 trips per day and private overnight travelers 3.5 trips per day when counting only full days spent in Hamburg; same-day travelers mostly made two trips, from the city entrance point to their destination and back for departure.
- All tourist groups had a higher share of car trips than residents, while residents had a significantly higher share of cycling trips; 40% of all trips by agents staying overnight were for driving home, to a hotel, or other accommodation.
Methods
- The study extends mobiTopp, an agent-based microscopic travel demand model, with touriTopp to simulate inhabitants and four traveler types together: private same-day, business same-day, private overnight, and overnight business travelers.
- The application uses Hamburg as the planning area, with a one-week spring simulation and input datasets including MiD, MOP, INFERMO, Destination Monitor, Quality Monitor, official tourist accommodation statistics, and traffic-count data.
- Analysis compares arrival days, accommodation and workplace distributions, mobility KPIs, modal split, and on-site activity distributions; model output was validated against existing input data before simulation.
Limitations
- The authors state that data availability was scarce and modeling was challenging: no crossed datasets were available, independent distributions were used, it could not be guaranteed that datasets contained only travelers or city/Hamburg-specific travel, and no commuter-ticket data for travelers existed, so a distribution was assumed and validated during calibration.
- The authors list further limitations and possible improvements: traveler origin is not considered; reasons for travel only distinguish business from private; travelers are not simulated as individual agents but as travel groups; and common trips cannot yet be modeled in mobiTopp.
- The paper also notes that the week-long comparison is slightly biased because only traveler trips occurring in the planning area are counted, while trips made on arrival or departure days at home are not considered.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning
After removing day trips within the planning area, Hamburg had 48.9 million same-day travelers in 2019.
“Since day trips 4 also included trips within the planning area, these must be removed for the application, resulting 5 in 48.9 million same-day travelers [38,40,41,42,43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The application of the model to the planning area of Hamburg provides evidence that tourists are responsible for about 7% of Hamburg's traffic volume.
“The application of the model to the planning area of Hamburg provides evidence that tourists are responsible for about 7% of Hamburg's traffic volume.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: People who travel together make all the trips on their journey together.
- Findingnone given
40% of all trips from agents that stay in Hamburg overnight, regardless of whether these are tourists or residents, account for driving home, to the hotel, or any other accommodation.
“40 % of all trips from agents that stay in Hamburg overnight, regardless of whether these are tourists or residents, account for driving home, to the hotel, or any other accommodation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Private overnight travelers' accommodation is distributed over the entire city area.
“Figure 8 depicts the spatial distributions of accommodation (e.g., hotels, apartments,…) of private overnight travelers.They are distributed over the entire city area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the practical example of Hamburg, clear differences between travelers and residents could be shown.
“Although in the practical example of Hamburg the data availability was in parts scarce, clear differences between travelers and residents could be shown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning
Overnight business travelers tend to stay in the city center and other zones with many workplaces.
“Hence, they tend to stay in the city center and other zones with many workplaces (see Figure 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The arrival hour varies for different touristic types.
“The arrival hour is determined by the start time of the selected activity schedule and varies, hence, also for the different touristic types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
All tourist groups have a higher share of car trips than residents.
“It is striking, 2 that all tourist groups have a higher share of car trips, residents, by contrast, have a significantly 3 higher share of cycling trips.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Tourists account for 7% of all trips within Hamburg.
“In total, tourists account for 7% of all trips within Hamburg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Residents undertake more trips than travelers.
“Comparing the crucial mobility KPIs reveals that residents undertake more trips than travelers (see Figure 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Same-day travelers cover shorter distances than overnight travelers.
“Consequently, they cover shorter distances than overnight travelers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The arrival day varies for different traveler types.
“This varies for the different traveler types, as illustrated in Figure 7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Private travelers cover larger distances than business travelers.
“Further, private travelers cover larger distances than business travelers with shorter travel times on average.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
When only counting days entirely spent in Hamburg, private overnight travelers average 3.5 trips per day.
“Consequently, their average -when considering all days-is significantly lower compared to the average when only counting the days entirely spent in Hamburg (overnight business travelers: 3.7 trips per day, private overnight travelers 3.5 trips per day).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
When staying overnight, the share of leisure activities increases.
“When staying overnight, the share of leisure activities increases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Residents have a significantly higher share of cycling trips than tourist groups.
“It is striking, 2 that all tourist groups have a higher share of car trips, residents, by contrast, have a significantly 3 higher share of cycling trips.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Private travelers have shorter travel times on average than business travelers.
“Further, private travelers cover larger distances than business travelers with shorter travel times on average.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All traveler types' modal splits deviate from Hamburg's residential modal split.
“As illustrated in Figure 11, different modal splits for different traveler types can be observed 1 over the course of a week, all of them deviate from Hamburg's residential modal split.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Different modal splits for different traveler types can be observed over the course of a week.
“As illustrated in Figure 11, different modal splits for different traveler types can be observed 1 over the course of a week, all of them deviate from Hamburg's residential modal split.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
When only counting days entirely spent in Hamburg, overnight business travelers average 3.7 trips per day.
“Consequently, their average -when considering all days-is significantly lower compared to the average when only counting the days entirely spent in Hamburg (overnight business travelers: 3.7 trips per day, private overnight travelers 3.5 trips per day).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Residents have a more versatile activity schedule than travelers.
“Residents have a more versatile activity schedule than travelers, which can be explained, on the one hand, by considering a whole week and not only certain days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most same-day travelers undertake only one activity on-site independently of their travel purpose, resulting in mostly two trips.
“Most same-day travelers undertake only one activity on-site independently of their travel purpose, which results in mostly two trips: the trip from the entrance point of the city to their destination in Hamburg and the departure trip.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is possible to simulate travelers and inhabitants with the same short-term module, which allows for an integrated simulation of both.
“Therefore, it is possible to simulate travelers and inhabitants with the same short-term module, which allows for an integrated simulation of both.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · hedged
“Therefore, it is possible to simulate travelers and inhabitants with the same short-term module, which allows for an integrated simulation of both.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · hedged
- Study design and conductown data
For same-day travelers, the individuals used in population synthesis were not exclusively travelers.
“In the case of the same-day travelers, these individuals were 14 not exclusively travelers, as would have been ideal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
mobiTopp is an agent-based travel demand modelling framework that models every person, household and car of the study area.
“mobiTopp is an agent-based travel demand modelling framework that models every person, household and car of the study area [30,31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Models from the field of tourism do not represent the activities travelers perform on site during their stay.
“They do not represent the activities travelers perform on site during their stay (see Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
No crossed data sets were available for the practical example of Hamburg.
“Unfortunately, no crossed data sets were available for the practical example of Hamburg.9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Integrating private and business travelers is not a standard method in travel demand models yet, despite its high relevance, especially for cities and regions that have major touristic attractivity.
“Overall, integrating private and business travelers is not a standard method in travel demand models yet, despite its high relevance, especially for cities and regions that have major touristic attractivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By following the concept of mobiTopp, it is possible to simulate inhabitants and travelers together.
“By following the concept of mobiTopp, an existing agent-based travel demand model, that simulates residential travel behavior, it is possible to simulate inhabitants and travelers together.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Agent-based models of very specific parts of touristic behavior on site are hardly compatible with the needs of regular travel demand models.
“These are hardly compatible with the needs of regular travel demand models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
A comparison of the few existing studies reveals that travelers' behavior differs strongly at different locations.
“A comparison of the few existing studies reveals that travelers' behavior differs strongly at different locations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The microscopic travel demand modeling approach is very suitable to incorporate travelers that behave differently than residents in their everyday life.
“Thus, this approach is very suitable to incorporate travelers that behave differently than residents in their everyday life.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Models that try to describe the behavior on site, including activity schedules and destinations, can hardly be found.
“Models that try to describe the behavior on site, including activity schedules and destinations, can hardly be found.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Weather, geographical and topological conditions as well as the destination's infrastructure and accessibility through different transportation modes have a substantial impact on both arrivals and mobility on-site.
“Weather, geographical (and topological) conditions as well as the destination's infrastructure and hence the accessibility through different transportation modes have a substantial impact on both arrivals and mobility on-site, as exemplified by studies from Kassel (Germany) and Salzburg (Austria).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
The basic structure of touriTopp corresponds to the structure of mobiTopp.
“The basic structure of touriTopp corresponds to the structure of mobiTopp: The long-term module consists of all submodules that simulate long-term-characteristics which are fixed during simulation.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“The basic structure of touriTopp corresponds to the structure of mobiTopp”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
- Premisenone given
In touriTopp the journey from the place of residence is not represented, but only the part that is relevant for mobility in the planning area.
“In contrast, in touriTopp the journey from the place of residence is not represented, but only the part that is relevant for mobility in the planning area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
It was not possible to evaluate whether travelers went to cities or specifically to Hamburg.
“It also was not possible to evaluate whether travelers went to cities or specifically to Hamburg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Approximately 25% of each traveler type visits Hamburg in spring.
“Since approximately 25% of each traveler 6 type visits Hamburg in spring [38,39,40], this season is selected for simulation.7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
It could not be guaranteed that the final datasets contained only travelers.
“However, it could not be guaranteed that the final datasets contained only travelers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
In macroscopic (aggregated) models it is hardly documented how the trips by people living outside of the area of study are included.
“In macroscopic (aggregated) models it is hardly documented how the trips by people living outside of the area of study are included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The comparison of all trips during one week's whole simulation period is slightly biased because only traveler trips happening in the planning area are counted.
“However, the comparison of all trips during one week's whole simulation period is slightly biased, as only traveler trips happening in the planning area are counted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
All trips made on the arrival or departure day at home are not considered.
“Correspondingly, all trips made on the arrival or departure day at home are not considered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
touriTopp allows a much more detailed simulation of travelers' mobility behavior than other, simpler models.
“In contrast to other, simpler models, touriTopp allows a much more detailed simulation of travelers' mobility behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The observed pattern corresponds well to the 'bleisure phenomenon' of combining work-related trips with private or leisure activities.
“This corresponds well to the so-called”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
In the framework mobiTopp it is currently not yet possible to model common trips.
“In the framework mobiTopp it is currently not yet possible to model common trips.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
No data was available for travelers owning commuter tickets for public transportation.
“Unfortunately, there was no data available for travelers owning commuter tickets for public transportation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Travelers, if modeled individually, could currently only move separately and never together.
“Therefore, travelers, if modeled individually, could currently only move separately and never together.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The higher share of pedestrian trips among business travelers could explain why private travelers cover larger distances with shorter travel times.
“This could be due to business travelers' higher share of pedestrian trips (see Figure 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
mobiTopp's simulation time of one week is beneficial to model travel behavior correctly.
“Accordingly, mobiTopp's simulation time of one week is beneficial to model travel behavior correctly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 20
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA more detailed analysis reveals differences in number of trips, mode choice, and trip length for all different traveler types and compared to inhabitants.
“A more detailed analysis, however, reveals differences (e.g., in the number of trips, mode choice and trip length) for all different traveler types and compared to inhabitants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: People who travel together make all the trips on their journey together.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn addition to 1.87 million residents from Hamburg, 694,026 travel agents were modeled, some representing a whole travel group.
“In addition to 1.87 million residents from Hamburg, 694,026 travel agents were modeled, some representing a whole travel group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenTravelers account for about 7% of traffic volume in Hamburg.
“Travelers are responsible for a substantial share of a city's traffic volume; they account for about 7 % in Hamburg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOvernight tourists often arrive in the evening or depart already in the morning, when staying for several days, and make only one trip on these days.
“However, overnight tourists often arrive in the evening or depart already in the morning, when staying for several days, and make, thus, only one trip on these days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenPrivate tourists mainly perform leisure activities whereas work-related activities characterize business travelers' trips.
“In contrast, private tourists mainly perform leisure activities whereas work-related activities characterize business travelers' trips.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPrivate travelers arrive more often at the weekend, while business trips occur more likely during the week.
“Private travelers arrive more often at the weekend, while business trips occur more likely during the week.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenTouristic travel behavior can differ strongly from everyday-life behavior due to different circumstances.
“However, touristic travel behavior can differ strongly from everyday-life behavior due to different circumstances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTravel demand models are generally based on the inhabitants of the area of study.
“Travel demand models are generally based on the inhabitants of the area of study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPeople walk a lot during their first visit and take public transport more often when visiting repeatedly.
“Hence, people walk a lot during their first visit and take public transport more often when visiting repeatedly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFor touriTopp only the population synthesis and the mobility related attributes in the long-term module were adapted for travelers.
“For touriTopp only the population synthesis and the mobility related attributes (see Figure 4) in the long-term module were adapted for travelers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLlorca et al. restrict on domestic visitors which stay at least one night, do not specify how activity schedules are created, and leave out simulation results.
“They, however, restrict on domestic visitors which stay at least one night, do not specify how activity schedules are created, and leave out simulation results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningTravel modes used for arrival determine mode choice behavior during the stay significantly.
“Travel modes used for arrival, for example, determine mode choice behavior during the stay significantly, as, e.g., the personal car cannot be used when arriving by plane or train.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWhen visiting cities for the first time, most tourists stay in central areas.
“Furthermore, when visiting cities for the first time, most tourists stay in central areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe range of movement increases with the number of visits.
“The range of movement increases with the number of visits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTrip purposes impact travel behavior; leisure travelers do more activities per day than business travelers.
“Trip purposes also impact travel behavior, e.g., leisure travelers do more activities per day than business travelers [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor overnight travelers, the data generally included travelers but not specifically city tourism or travel to Hamburg.
“For overnight travelers, however, travelers generally were included 16 and not specifically city tourism or travel to Hamburg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenTourists represent exogenous travel demand, similar to through traffic, which depending on the model may or may not be included.
“Tourists represent exogenous travel demand, similar to through traffic, which depending on the model may or may not be included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTravelers' contribution to mobility cannot be neglected.
“The preceding paragraphs provided evidence that travelers' contribution to mobility cannot be neglected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAbout 14% of Kassel's daily traffic volume is caused by tourists.
“They conclude that about 14 % of Kassel's daily traffic volume is caused by tourists.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to Bieland et al., mode choice on-site is predetermined by the mode used for arrival.
“According to Bieland et al. [14], mode choice on-site is predetermined by the mode used for arrival.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAs no existing model was found to adequately simulate travelers' behavior, a new one was developed.
“As no existing model was found to adequately simulate travelers' behavior, a new one was developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn agent-based travel demand models there is an even higher focus on inhabitants and due to the agent-based structure higher effort is required to include external persons.
“In agent-based travel demand models there is an even higher focus on inhabitants and due to the agent-based structure higher effort is required to include external persons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Kassel, travelers' modal split has a higher share of car and public transport trips, whereas the shares of bicycle and walking trips are much lower than everyday mobility.
“The travelers' modal split has a higher share of car and public transport trips, whereas the shares of bicycle and walking trips are much lower.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTouristic activities have increased due to globalization, rising incomes, and changing working patterns that allow for additional short breaks.
“Touristic activities have increased (see, e.g.[5]) due to globalization, rising incomes, and changing working patterns that allow for additional short breaks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMicroscopic travel demand models allow to cope with the heterogeneity of a population and, hence, the individual framework conditions and resulting decisions of each individual.
“Microscopic travel demand models allow to cope with the heterogeneity of a population and, hence, the individual framework conditions and resulting decisions of each individual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenBefore running the simulation, the model output was compared to the existing input data for validation.
“Before running the simulation, the model output was compared to the existing input data for validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe models for the assignment of mobility-related attributes as well as choice models can be replaced whenever a more suitable data source is available.
“Thanks to the framework's modular structure, the models for the assignment of mobility-related attributes as well as choice models can be replaced whenever a more suitable data source is available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe higher share of car trips and lower share of cycling among tourists is due to restricted availability, as travelers arriving by car, plane or public transport would not take their bike from home.
“This is due to restricted availability, as it is assumed that travelers 4 that arrive by car, plane or public transport would not take their bike from home.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Travelers who arrive by car, plane or public transport would not take their bike from home.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDuring the model set-up, major gaps in data availability for touristic travel behavior were identified.
“Nevertheless, during the model set-up, major gaps in data availability for touristic travel behavior were identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe application of the model in Hamburg provides first evidence that results broaden knowledge and are beneficial for planning authorities.
“The application of the model in the planning area of Hamburg provides first evidence that results obtained broaden knowledge and are hence beneficial for planning authorities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe origin of travelers is not considered in the current model.
“The origin of travelers is not considered in the current model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenReasons for travel currently are only considered to distinguish between business and private travelers.
“Reasons for travel currently are only considered to distinguish between business and private travelers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone giventouriTopp grants the possibility to include empirically-based activity plans.
“It grants the possibility to include empirically-based activity plans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTravelers are currently not simulated as individual agents; a travel agent represents an entire travel group.
“To be able to represent common trips, travelers are currently not simulated as individual agents.”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“Instead, a travel agent represents an entire travel group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTravelers are distributed over the course of the week and obtain various characteristics.
“Furthermore, travelers are distributed over the course of the week and obtain various characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe traveler model presented is based on rule-based decision models.
“The traveler model presented is based on rule-based decision models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDue to data availability, the modeling was challenging, and the model had to be simplified.
“Due to the data availability, the modeling was challenging, and the model had to be simplified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe model allows for differentiation between trips with business and private purposes and different durations.
“The model allows for differentiation between trips with business and private purposes and different durations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
People who travel together make all the trips on their journey together.
“It is assumed that people who travel together make all the trips on their journey together.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Travelers who arrive by car, plane or public transport would not take their bike from home.
“as it is assumed that travelers 4 that arrive by car, plane or public transport would not take their bike from home.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A distribution for commuter ticket ownership among travelers was assumed.
“A distribution was assumed, which was validated during the calibration of the model.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
People who visit relatives and people who undertake cultural trips choose different activities.
“However, it is assumed that people who visit relatives and people who untertake cultural trips choose different activities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No suitable model was available that acknowledged the different nature of travel behavior on-site from tourists compared to residents.
“So far, no suitable model was available that acknowledged the different nature of travel behavior on-site from tourists compared to residents.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- UNWTO, "World Tourism Barometer Vol. 18, No.1," 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.e-unwto.org/loi/wtobarometereng?expanded=d2020.v18. [Accessed 30 07 2021].
- T. Wieland, J. Müller, C. J. Schladot and K. Schwager, "Geschäftlich motivierter Städtetourismus -die Fallstudien Hannover, Wolfsburg, Göttingen und Lübeck," in Orte, Wege, Visionen : Aktuelle Ansätze der Tourismusgeographie. Hrsg.: T. Reeh, Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 2011, pp. 11-33.
- C. Gloor, L. Mauron and K. Nagel, "A pedestrian simulator for hiking in the alps," in 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2003.
- W. Scherr, C. Joshi, P. Manser, N. Frischknecht and D. Métrailler, "MOBi.plans: A Microscopic, Activity-Based Travel Demand Model of Switzerland.," in 19th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2019.
- Authors
- Ulrich, J., Wilkes, G., Kostorz, N., Briem, L., Kagerbauer, M., & Vortisch, P.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Board (TRB)
- Publisher
- Transportation Research Board (TRB)
- Published
- 2022
- OpenAlex
- W7126208049
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- KITopen (other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- travel demand modeling, agent-based modeling, business travelers, tourists, overnight trips, mode choice, trip length, traffic flow, transportation planning, Hamburg
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review