Cited by 236Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Critical Thinking: The Development of an Essential Skill for Nursing Students

Open access
Papathanasiou, Ioanna, Kleisiaris, Christos, Fradelos, Evangelos, Kakou, Katerina, Kourkouta, Lambrini·2014·Acta Informatica Medica

Abstract

Critical thinking is defined as the mental process of actively and skillfully perception, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of collected information through observation, experience and communication that leads to a decision for action. In nursing education there is frequent reference to critical thinking and to the significance that it has in daily clinical nursing practice. Nursing clinical instructors know that students face difficulties in making decisions related to clinical practice. The main critical thinking skills in which nursing students should be exercised during their studies are critical analysis, introductory and concluding justification, valid conclusion, distinguish of facts and opinions, evaluation the credibility of information sources, clarification of concepts and recognition of conditions. Specific behaviors are essentials for enhancing critical thinking. Nursing students in order to learn and apply critical thinking should develop independence of thought, fairness, perspicacity in personal and social level, humility, spiritual courage, integrity, perseverance, self-confidence, interest for research and curiosity. Critical thinking is an essential process for the safe, efficient and skillful nursing practice. The nursing education programs should adopt attitudes that promote critical thinking and mobilize the skills of critical reasoning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5455/aim.2014.22.283-286

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reflective process fostered by engaging with LLMs in diagnosing and revising cases cultivates an educational atmosphere conducive to developing critical thinking skills.

    “The reflective process fostered by engaging with LLMs in diagnosing and revising cases not only cultivates an educational atmosphere conducive to developing critical thinking skills but also suggests practical applications in clinical settings [50].”

    From Mitigating cognitive biases in clinical decision-making through multi-agent conversations using large language models: simulation study (2024) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Conclusion (page not specified) says nursing education should promote critical thinking, and Section 4 links reflection and problem-solving to nursing practice. The paper does not address LLMs or show that diagnosing and revising cases with them fosters this reflective process or develops critical thinking. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papathanasiou, I., Kleisiaris, C., Fradelos, E., Kakou, K., & Kourkouta, L.
Affiliations
  • Technological Educational Institute of Thessaly (GR)
  • Hellenic Mediterranean University (GR)
  • Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Papathanasiou, Ioanna
Venue
Acta Informatica Medica
Publisher
ScopeMed
Published
2014
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
283
ISSN
0353-8109 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132113252
Cited by
236
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
25.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Acta Informatica Medica (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
critical thinking, nursing students, nursing education, clinical decision-making, critical analysis, critical reasoning, clinical instructors, nursing practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review