Turkish adaptation of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: validity and reliability study
Abstract
Objective: Psychological distress is defined as emotional damage characterized by symptoms of depression and anxiety. Aim of study is to adapt Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10-PDS) to Turkish and to determine its validity and reliability and use it in psychological distress screenings. Methods: K10-PDS was translated into Turkish according to WHO World Mental Health Initiative Interview Translation Guidelines. A Sociodemographic Information Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care (BDI-PC) and Turkish K10-PDS were applied to 200 volunteers between 18-77 years old in Family Medicine and Psychiatry polyclinics of Antalya Training and Research Hospital. Turkish K10-PDS were given again to 55 participants for reliability study four days later. Results: Mean of participants' Turkish K10-PDS score was 21.8±10.7. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of the Turkish K10-PDS was 0.95. Based on ROC analysis, the area under the curve was found to be 0.958. Spearman-Brown two-quartile test reliability was 0.93, and test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.89. Item-total score correlations ranged between 0.720 and 0.887. At the cut-off point of >20, the sensitivity was 92.0% and specificity was 90.4%. Conclusion: It has been shown that Turkish K10-PDS can be used as a valid and reliable scale for the detection, screening and treatment of depression and anxiety disorders, especially for psychological distress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Kessler-10 Turkish and Arabic versions have good psychometric properties.
“The validated Turkish and Arabic version of the scale showed good psychometric properties (Altun et al., 2019;Easton et al., 2017).”
From "Doing What Matters in Times of Stress" to Decrease Psychological Distress During COVID-19: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Trial. (2022) · cites this paper as Altun et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acarturk, C., Kurt, G., Ilkkursun, Z., Uygun, E., & Karaoglan-Kahilogullari, A. (2022) · Intervention Journal of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Conflict Affected Areas · doi:10.4103/intv.intv_29_21 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Altun, Y., Özen, M., & Kuloğlu, M.
- Venue
- Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- IMR Press
- Published
- 2019
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1302-6631 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911370337
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10, Turkish adaptation, psychological distress, depression screening, anxiety screening, scale validity, test-retest reliability, cross-cultural adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review