Cited by 29Phytochemistry and Bioactive CompoundsNail Diseases and TreatmentsEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

Efficacy and Phytochemical Analysis of Aqueous Extract of Calotropis procera against Selected Dermatophytes

Open access
Aliyu, Rabiu, Abubakar, Mikaeel, Kasarawa, Adamu, Dabai, Yakubu, Lawal, Nafiu, Bello, Muhammad, Fardami, Aminu·2015·Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since ancient time, increased interest has been witnessed in the use of an alternative herbal medicine for managing, and the treatment of fungal diseases worldwide. This may be connected to the cost and relative toxicities of the available antifungal drugs. It has been a known tradition practiced in the northern part of Nigeria that parents and teachers use the white latex of Calotropis procera to treat Tinea capitis in children attending the local religious school in the area. This study was conducted in 2009 to ascertain the above claim. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fresh latex of C. procera was screened for their antifungal activity against species of dermatophytes: Trichophyton spp., Microsporum spp. and Epidermophyton spp. using the agar incorporation method. RESULTS: The result shows that the latex inhibits the in vitro growth of these pathogenic fungi to varying extents with Trichophyton spp. being the most susceptible (P < 0.05) and thus highly inhibited by the latex followed by the Microsporum spp. and Epidermopyton spp. was least inhibited. These inhibitions followed a dose-dependent trend as undiluted latex (100%) gave the highest inhibitory impacts (P < 0.05) when compared to serially diluted latex. The phytochemical analysis of the fresh latex indicated the presence of alkaloids, saponin, tannins, steroids, flavonoids, anthraquinone, and triterpenoids. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study confirmed the perceived usefulness of the latex in the treatment of T. capitis (ringworm) practiced in our society and therefore, its use topically in the treatment of dermatomycotic infection is encouraged.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5455/jice.20151012012909

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on closely related species have confirmed the efficacy of Calotropis extracts against dermatophytes like Microsporum canis and Trichophyton mentagrophytes.

    “Furthermore, studies on closely related species have confirmed the efficacy of Calotropis extracts against dermatophytes like Microsporum canis and Trichophyton mentagrophytes , supporting its traditional use in treating Tinea capitis (ringworm) [12], [13].”

    From Formulation and Evaluation of Antifungal Soap Using Latex of Calotropis gigantea L. (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results report that C. procera latex inhibited Microsporum and Trichophyton isolates, and the Discussion reports antifungal activity from extracts of C. procera and the related C. gigantea. Neither passage identifies the tested fungi as Microsporum canis or Trichophyton mentagrophytes. The Discussion mentions T. mentagrophytes only in connection with an extract of Acalypha wilkesian. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]Cheesbrough M District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries 2006 2nd ed Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Press
  2. [2]Weitzman I Summerbell RC The dermatophytes Clin Microbiol Rev 1995 8 240 59 7621400 PMC172857
  3. [3]Iqbal J Mishra RP Allie AH Antidermatophytic activity of angiospermic plants: A review Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2015 8 75 80
  4. [4]Behl PN Luthra A Bullous eruption with calotropis procera – a medicinal plant used in India Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2002 68 150 1 17656917
  5. [5]Fostel JM Lartey PA Emerging novel antifungal agents Drug Discov Today 2000 5 25 32 10637546
  6. [6]Mossa JS Tariq M Mohsin A Ageel AM al-Yahya MA al-Said MS Pharmacological studies on aerial parts of Calotropis procera Am J Chin Med 1991 19 223 31 1767794
  7. [8]Aliero BL Umar MA Suberu HA Abubakar AA Handbook of Common Plants in North Western Nigeria 2001 1st ed Sokoto Usmanu Danfodiyo University Press
  8. [11]Sofowora EA Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa 1993 2nd ed Ibadan, Nigeria John Wiley and Sons Limited Sunshine House, Spectrum Books Ltd
  9. [15]Goyal D Sharma S Mahmood A Inhibition of dextransucrase activity in Streptococcus mutans by plant phenolics Indian J Biochem Biophys 2013 50 48 53 23617074
  10. [16]Alade PI Irobi ON Antimicrobial activities of crude leaf extracts of Acalypha wilkesiana J Ethnopharmacol 1993 39 171 4 8258974
  11. [17]Verástegui MA Sánchez CA Heredia NL García-Alvarado JS Antimicrobial activity of extracts of three major plants from the Chihuahuan desert J Ethnopharmacol 1996 52 175 7 8771460
  12. [21]Puavilai S Choonhakarn C Drug eruptions in Bangkok: A 1-year study at Ramathibodi Hospital Int J Dermatol 1998 37 747 51 9802684

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aliyu, R., Abubakar, M., Kasarawa, A., Dabai, Y., Lawal, N., Bello, M., & Fardami, A.
Affiliations
Usmanu Danfodiyo University (NG)
Corresponding author
Aliyu, Rabiu
Venue
Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology
Publisher
ScopeMed
Published
2015
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
314
ISSN
2146-8397 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2194182863
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
Calotropis procera, LaTeX, antifungal activity, dermatophytes, tinea capitis, Trichophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton, phytochemical screening, herbal medicine, fungal skin infection, topical treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review