The Impact of Professionalization in Public Procurement – evidence from a case study
Open accessAbstract
The importance of public procurement for achieving value for money in public purchases – thus obtaining important savings in the use of taxpayers’ money and effectiveness in meeting citizen’s demand for public goods of a given quality – is widely recognised, as made clear by the Directive 2014/24 of the European Union and the international legal framework for public procurement at large. But how can these goals be met? Professionalization is a necessary condition and thus represents a key part of the final answer. But what kind of professionalization is really needed? In what environment? With which results? These questions are rarely answered with real life examples. Taking advantage of a questionnaire-based cohort of individuals that have gone through a process of professionalization in an international environment, this paper expands on its challenges and on the importance of professionalization of the persons working in public procurement-related activities as key to an efficient use of public money.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One case study shows that staff who attend a capacity-building program usually remain in the same company and continue working in the procurement function holding the same job position.
“For example, one case study shows that staff that attends a capacity-building program usually remains in the same company and continues working in the procurement function holding the same job position (Maria Antonietta Coppola and Gustavo Piga, 2019 [17]).”
From Professionalising the public procurement workforce (2023) · cites this paper as Maria Antonietta Coppola and Gustavo Piga, 2019 [17]
Cites
Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment
Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.1278 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Bureaucratic Competence and Procurement Outcomes
Decarolis, F., Giuffrida, L., Iossa, E., Mollisi, V., & Spagnolo, G. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24201 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Professionalising the public procurement workforce
(2023) · OECD Public Governance Policy Papers · doi:10.1787/e2eda150-en · Cited by 167 · see citing works
- Authors
- Antonietta Coppola, M., & Piga, G.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Venue
- European Journal of Public Procurement Markets
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 59-73
- ISSN
- 2184-3813 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4205387841
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- European Journal of Public Procurement Markets (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Keywords
- professionalization, public procurement, value for money, administrative efficiency, international public procurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review