The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a Substantial EU-Japan Partnership
Open accessAbstract
The EU and Japan have spent decades normalizing trade links and attempting broader cooperation. In July 2017, political leaders agreed in principle to an economic partnership agreement (EPA) and to a strategic partnership agreement (SPA) hoping to enhance collaboration on economic, political, security and other issues, all buttressed by fundamental values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law. The agreements will likely be finalized and ratified this decade, so a more substantial partnership between the EU and Japan may unroll in economic and security fields as both sides adjust and converge their economic models and security paradigms. Yet, a comprehensive partnership based on shared values would take much more time to develop and galvanize the peoples of both sides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kantei diplomacy? Japan's hybrid leadership in foreign and security policy
Pugliese, G. (2016) · The Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/09512748.2016.1201131 · Cited by 72
Hosoya, Y. (2011) · Asia-Pacific Review · doi:10.1080/13439006.2011.582677 · Cited by 41
The evolution of the EU-Japan relationship: towards a ‘normative partnership’?
Hosoya, Y. (2012) · Japan Forum · doi:10.1080/09555803.2012.699455 · Cited by 24
Partnering for Global Security: The EU, Its Strategic Partners and Transnational Security Challenges
Renard, T. (2016) · European Foreign Affairs Review · doi:10.54648/eerr2016003 · Cited by 21
By land and by sea: the potential of EU-Japan security cooperation
Midford, P. (2012) · Japan Forum · doi:10.1080/09555803.2012.699454 · Cited by 14
The EU-Japan Security Dialogue : Invisible but Comprehensive
Mykal, O. (2011) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789089641632 · Cited by 10
Juries in the Japanese Legal System: The Continuing Struggle for Citizen Participation and Democracy
Johnson, D. T. (2016) · Social Science Japan Journal · doi:10.1093/ssjj/jyw005 · Cited by 4
The EU needs a better and fairer scrutiny procedure over Rule of Law compliance
Closa, C. (2015) · DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1958.6729 · Cited by 1
How does the European Union contribute to securityPreprint
Cooper, R. A. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New horizons in EU–Japan security cooperation
Kirchner, E. J., & Dorussen, H. (2021) · Asia Europe Journal · doi:10.1007/s10308-020-00586-z · Cited by 12
Drelich-Skulska, B., & Bobowski, S. (2021) · Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review · doi:10.15678/eber.2021.090212 · Cited by 11
Borucińska, I. (2021) · Regional Formation and Development Studies · doi:10.15181/rfds.v25i2.1741 · Cited by 4
Institutionalization of Strategic Partnerships : Comparative Analysis of Established
Domachowska, A., Gawron-Tabor, K., & Piechowiak-Lamparska, J. (2018) · Athenaeum Polskie Studia Politologiczne · doi:10.15804/athena.2018.60.12 · Cited by 3
EU-Japan Agreements: Content, Context and Implications
Kuźnar, A., & Menkes, J. B. (2020) · Review of European and Comparative Law · doi:10.31743/recl.4839 · Cited by 1
Commercio globale e diritto del lavoro: l'accordo di libero scambio UE-Giappone
Riccobono, A., & Bologna, S. (2019) · GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI · doi:10.3280/gdl2019-162006
Japan and the EU: Transnational Cooperation in the XXI Century
Karenin, D. M., & Kuzmin, V. A. (2021) · History and modern perspectives · doi:10.33693/2658-4654-2021-3-3-28-37
Čar, A. (2018) · Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy · doi:10.3935/cyelp.14.2018.316
(2018) · Common Market Law Review · doi:10.54648/cola2018114
European Union–Japan Relations
(2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394186037.ch2
Χαλλουμής, C. C. Κ., Eriotis, N., & Vasiliou, D. (2026) · Economies · doi:10.3390/economies14100483
Metadata
- Authors
- de Prado, C.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
- Corresponding author
- de Prado, César
- ORCID
- de Prado, César
- Venue
- European Foreign Affairs Review
- Publisher
- Kluwer Law International BV
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- Issue 4
- Pages
- 435-454
- ISSN
- 1384-6299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2772778895
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Foreign Affairs Review (publishedVersion)
- Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
- Keywords
- EU-Japan relations, Economic Partnership Agreements, Strategic Partnership Agreement, security cooperation, economic models, shared values, democracy and human rights, rule of law, EU external relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
