Report: China’s New AI Regulations
Abstract
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has moved ahead of other jurisdictions in regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI) by enacting a set of regulations aimed at addressing risks associated with AI. This article reviews three key AI specific regulations enacted in the PRC in 2022 and 2023. Together these regulations set out comprehensive obligations on the use of generative AI and algorithmic recommendation services in the PRC. The obligations include general requirements such as to comply with the law and principles of fairness as well as to protect against incorrect political direction and violation of social morality. There are also more specific obligations to achieve those objectives. These include, ensuring the regulator has visibility of certain algorithms by requiring the filing of information about the relevant algorithms. Further there are specific obligations on service providers such as to label training data appropriately, take measures to screen illegal or harmful content, verify the identities of users for some services, protect against fake news and label artificial intelligence generated content as synthetic. The regulations also provide a suite of rights for users, including the right not to be targeted on the basis of their personal characteristics by services using AI algorithms. The obligations under these regulations are significant and it will be interesting to see how the PRC’s regulatory approach impacts the AI industry in the PRC in contrast to other…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
China se ha adelantado a otras jurisdicciones de la inteligencia artificial, promulgando un conjunto de regulaciones sobre los riesgos asociados, estableciendo obligaciones integrales sobre el uso de IA generativa y sus algoritmos, protegiendo contra una dirección política incorrecta y la violación de la moral social.
“Franks et al. (2024), en su reporte sobre regulaciones de IA en la República Popular China indican que este país se ha adelantado a otras jurisdicciones de la inteligencia artificial, promulgando un conjunto de regulaciones sobre los riesgos asociados, estableciendo obligaciones integrales sobre el uso de IA generativa y sus algoritmos, protegiendo contra una dirección política incorrecta y la”
From Hacia una normativa sobre la inteligencia artificial (IA): consideraciones clave y regulaciones internacionales (2024) · cites this paper as Franks et al. (2024)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bustillos Ortega, O., Murillo Gamboa, J., Núñez Peralta, O., & Rodríguez Sibaja, F. (2024) · Interfases · doi:10.26439/interfases2024.n020.7178 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Franks, E., Lee, B., & Xu, H.
- ORCID
- Xu, Hui
- Venue
- Global Privacy Law Review
- Publisher
- Kluwer Law International BV
- Published
- 2024-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- Issue 1
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 2666-3570 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392651528
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 51.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Privacy Law Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- AI regulation, generative AI, training data labeling, user authentication, fake news, algorithmic discrimination, user rights, AI governance, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review