Cited by 21Digitalization, Law, and RegulationEthics and Social Impacts of AILaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

Report: China’s New AI Regulations

Franks, Esther, Lee, Bianca, Xu, Hui·2024·Global Privacy Law Review

Abstract

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has moved ahead of other jurisdictions in regulating Artificial Intelligence (AI) by enacting a set of regulations aimed at addressing risks associated with AI. This article reviews three key AI specific regulations enacted in the PRC in 2022 and 2023. Together these regulations set out comprehensive obligations on the use of generative AI and algorithmic recommendation services in the PRC. The obligations include general requirements such as to comply with the law and principles of fairness as well as to protect against incorrect political direction and violation of social morality. There are also more specific obligations to achieve those objectives. These include, ensuring the regulator has visibility of certain algorithms by requiring the filing of information about the relevant algorithms. Further there are specific obligations on service providers such as to label training data appropriately, take measures to screen illegal or harmful content, verify the identities of users for some services, protect against fake news and label artificial intelligence generated content as synthetic. The regulations also provide a suite of rights for users, including the right not to be targeted on the basis of their personal characteristics by services using AI algorithms. The obligations under these regulations are significant and it will be interesting to see how the PRC’s regulatory approach impacts the AI industry in the PRC in contrast to other…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.54648/gplr2024007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • China se ha adelantado a otras jurisdicciones de la inteligencia artificial, promulgando un conjunto de regulaciones sobre los riesgos asociados, estableciendo obligaciones integrales sobre el uso de IA generativa y sus algoritmos, protegiendo contra una dirección política incorrecta y la violación de la moral social.

    “Franks et al. (2024), en su reporte sobre regulaciones de IA en la República Popular China indican que este país se ha adelantado a otras jurisdicciones de la inteligencia artificial, promulgando un conjunto de regulaciones sobre los riesgos asociados, estableciendo obligaciones integrales sobre el uso de IA generativa y sus algoritmos, protegiendo contra una dirección política incorrecta y la”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franks, E., Lee, B., & Xu, H.
ORCID
Xu, Hui
Venue
Global Privacy Law Review
Published
2024-03-01
Volume
5
Issue
Issue 1
Pages
43-49
ISSN
2666-3570 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392651528
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
51.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Privacy Law Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Keywords
AI regulation, generative AI, training data labeling, user authentication, fake news, algorithmic discrimination, user rights, AI governance, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review