Cited by 43Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovative Human-Technology InteractionGender and Technology in Education

COGNITIVE ABSORPTION AND THE ADOPTION OF NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES.

Agarwal, Ritu, Sambamurthy, V., Stair, Ralph M.·1997·Academy of Management Proceedings

Abstract

A new construct called cognitive absorption is proposed as a critical concept in the study of individual attitudes and behaviors toward information technologies. Cognitive absorption includes three dimensions: perceived ease of use, flow, and computer playfulness. Antecedents to cognitive absorption are specified. Empirical results from two studies confirm the hypothesized relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ambpp.1997.4983719

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M.
Venue
Academy of Management Proceedings
Published
1997-08
Volume
1997
Issue
1
Pages
293-297
ISSN
  • 0065-0668 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6561
OpenAlex
W2163293179
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
cognitive absorption, information technology adoption, perceived ease of use, flow, computer playfulness, attitudes toward information technology, technology acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review