The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychological Contracts in Algorithmic Management
Abstract
Algorithmic management makes decisions that humans used to make, changing the employee-employer relationship. A new discipline is emerging to explain whether and how algorithms impact people’s lives in organizations, online platforms, education, and healthcare, among other areas. This paper seeks to contribute to this effort by addressing the question of how algorithmic management influences the employment relationship using a psychological contract perspective. We develop propositions to explicate the mechanisms behind how algorithmic management affects employee psychological contract. Our propositions are built upon two dimensions: (1) the role of the algorithm, such as consistency in decisions and outcomes, constrained social interactions and the level of algorithmic intervention in the psychological contract; and (2) human-centered design features, such as algorithmic fairness, transparency, and participatory involvement that may promote one’s psychological contract. We discuss how these design features will relate to the psychological contract through the mechanisms of perceived justice, sensemaking, and empowerment. We conclude with empirical recommendations and practical implications to encourage research in this direction.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“psychological contract breach (Tomprou & Lee, 2019)”
From Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs (2022) · cites this paper as Tomprou & Lee, 2019
Citations
Cited by
Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K. (2022) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomprou, M., & Lee, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon U.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Proceedings
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2019-08-01
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12894
- ISSN
- 0065-0668
- 2151-6561
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Contracts in Algorithmic Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ambpp.2019.12894abstract
- The paper
- Tomprou, M., & Lee, M. K. (2019). Psychological Contracts in Algorithmic Management. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.12894abstract