The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Academy of Management Executive
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259140 · Cited by 4,544
Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011928 · Cited by 4,461
Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer
Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445 · Cited by 3,864
Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005 · Cited by 3,701
Metadata
- Venue
- The Academy of Management executive/Academy of Management executive
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2010-12-13
- ISSN
- 0896-3789 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.5465/ame
- OpenAlex
- W4231495351
- Cited by
- 8,844
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Academy of Management Executive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/ame
- The paper
- Academy of Management Executive. (2010). The Academy of Management executive/Academy of Management executive. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
