Cited by 304Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchAcademic Writing and Publishing

Publishing in AMJ —Part 7: What's Different about Qualitative Research?

Bansal, Pratima (Tima), Corley, Kevin·2012·Academy of Management Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2012.4003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bansal, P. (., & Corley, K.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2012-06
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
509-513
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2052851020
Cited by
304
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
74.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
qualitative research, scholarly publishing, manuscript submission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review