The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aging Populations and Management
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
Cited by
Understanding and Tackling Societal Grand Challenges through Management Research
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.4007 · Cited by 2,021
Self-citationKnowledge Retention From Older and Retiring Workers: What Do We Know, and Where Do We Go From Here?
Burmeister, A., & Deller, J. (2016) · Work, Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/waw002 · Cited by 100
Hwang, J., & Park, S. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021140 · Cited by 52
Guillén, L., & Kunze, F. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21953 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulik, C. T., Ryan, S., Harper, S., & George, G.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 929-935
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2064316297
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aging Populations and Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2014.4004
- The paper
- Kulik, C. T., Ryan, S., Harper, S., & George, G. (2014). Aging Populations and Management. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.4004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
