The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal
Abstract
This article comments on a paper by Sumantra Ghoshal published in this issue of Academy of Management Learning & Education which argues that academic research related to the conduct of business and management has had some very significant and negative influences on the practice of management. The author notes that in a word, Ghoshal is right. He is right in the sense that economics is indeed taking over management and organization science, just as it has taken over political science and law and is making inroads into sociology and psychology--trends that have been occasionally documented and could, and should be, empirically studied. The field of economics has more and more tended to dominate the formulation of curricula and research agendas in all of the social and policy sciences and, in some cases, even in the humanities. Ghoshal is right that this takeover matters, because social theories matter. The theories that come to be believed and accepted affect both public and organizational policies and practices. Moreover, as Ghoshal notes, theories, once accepted, set into motion processes that tend to ensure they become self-fulfilling. And Ghoshal is certainly right when he reiterates that the assumptions of much of economic theory and the effects of these assumptions on people and institutions can be harmful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action
Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.4 · Cited by 2,086
When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings
Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012181 · Cited by 853
From Homogenization to Pluralism: International Management Research in the Academy and Beyond
Tsui, A. S. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28166121 · Cited by 486
Transaction Cost Theory: Past Progress, Current Challenges, and Suggestions for the Future
Cuypers, I. R. P., Hennart, J.-F., Silverman, B. S., & Ertug, G. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2019.0051 · Cited by 384
Publish or Perish: Bane or Boon of Academic Life?
De Rond, M., & Miller, A. N. (2005) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492605276850 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeffer, J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Learning & Education
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-100
- ISSN
- 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9585
- OpenAlex
- W2087198851
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amle.2005.16132570
- The paper
- Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.