The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept
Abstract
Research data on dominant work-related values patterns in 53 countries and regions are used to suggest how definitions of the quality of life are affected by national culture patterns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cultures differ on individualism and collectivism.
“An important aspect that cultures differ on is individualism and collectivism (Hofstede, 1984; Triandis, 1995; House et al., 2004).”
From Why do people use Facebook? (2012) · cites this paper as Hofstede, 1984
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 1,257
- Authors
- Hofstede, G.
- Corresponding author
- Hofstede, Geert
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987123461
- Cited by
- 1,257
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
- Keywords
- quality of life, cultural relativity, national culture, work values, cross-cultural comparison, value patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review