Organizational Learning
Open accessAbstract
Made available in DSpace on 2012-01-25T22:29:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 organizationalle1110fiol.pdf: 2345197 bytes, checksum: 12afa5e5968bdfcf89bb44624319f158 (MD5) license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) Previous issue date:
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall change can only be achieved by higher-level learning, which results in the development of new norms, values, and practices.
“Overall change can only be achieved by higher-level learning (e.g., Fiol and Lyles 1985)-also called second-order learning (e.g., Sørensen 2002) or deutero learning (e.g., Visser 2007)-which results in the development of new norms, values, and practices.”
From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Fiol and Lyles 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation
Blackler, F. (1995) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/017084069501600605 · Cited by 2,498 · see citing works
Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance
Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015 · Cited by 2,053 · see citing works
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions
Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400167 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Organizational learning capability: A proposal of measurement
Jerez-Gómez, P., Céspedes-Lorente, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.002 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
The role of organizational learning in the opportunity-recognition process
Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2005) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00093.x · Cited by 590 · see citing works
Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory
Antunes, H. D. J. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory
Berta, W., Cranley, L., Dearing, J. W., Dogherty, E. J., Squires, J. E., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Aarons, G. A. (2005) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.04.008 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K. (2016) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127016632758 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Hospital organization culture, capacity to innovate and success in technology adoption
do Carmo Caccia‐Bava, M., Guimaraes, T., & Harrington, S. J. (2006) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/14777260610662735 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Business value appropriation roadmap for artificial intelligence
Mishra, A. N., & Pani, A. K. (2021) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-07-2019-0107 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Reliable Effectiveness: A Theory on Sustaining and Replicating Worthwhile Innovations
Racine, D. P. (2006) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-006-0047-1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Do the Modern Neurosciences Call for a New Model of Organizational Cognition?
Seni, D. A. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9385-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 803
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4254219547
- Cited by
- 3,385
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 150 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 147 · 2012: 135
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Keywords
- organizational learning, knowledge acquisition, knowledge transfer, organizational knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
