Cited by 286Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationOrganizational Learning and Leadership

Why (we think) facilitation works: insights from organizational learning theory

Open access
Berta, Whitney, Cranley, Lisa, Dearing, James W., Dogherty, Elizabeth J., Squires, Janet E., Estabrooks, Carole A.·2015·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a guided interactional process that has been popularized in health care. Its popularity arises from its potential to support uptake and application of scientific knowledge that stands to improve clinical and managerial decision-making, practice, and ultimately patient outcomes and organizational performance. While this popular concept has garnered attention in health services research, we know that both the content of facilitation and its impact on knowledge implementation vary. The basis of this variation is poorly understood, and understanding is hampered by a lack of conceptual clarity. DISCUSSION: In this paper, we argue that our understanding of facilitation and its effects is limited in part by a lack of clear theoretical grounding. We propose a theoretical home for facilitation in organizational learning theory. Referring to extant literature on facilitation and drawing on theoretical literature, we discuss the features of facilitation that suggest its role in contributing to learning capacity. We describe how facilitation may contribute to generating knowledge about the application of new scientific knowledge in health-care organizations. Facilitation's promise, we suggest, lies in its potential to stimulate higher-order learning in organizations through experimenting with, generating learning about, and sustaining small-scale adaptations to organizational processes and work routines. The varied effectiveness of facilitation observed in the literature is associated with the presence or absence of factors known to influence organizational learning, since facilitation itself appears to act as a learning mechanism. We offer propositions regarding the relationships between facilitation processes and key organizational learning concepts that have the potential to guide future work to further our understanding of the role that facilitation plays in learning and knowledge generation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [83]Institute of Medicine Closing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century 2002 Washington, D.C. National Academy Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berta, W., Cranley, L., Dearing, J. W., Dogherty, E. J., Squires, J. E., & Estabrooks, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Providence Health Care (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Berta, Whitney
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2015-10-06
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
141-141
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096255578
Cited by
286
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
23.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
Keywords
facilitation, organizational learning theory, knowledge implementation, health care organization, learning ability, higher-order learning, organizational adaptation, knowledge production, learning mechanisms, implementation effectiveness
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Health Services Research, Humans, Learning, Organizational Innovation, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review