Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,385Organizational Learning and LeadershipInnovation and Knowledge ManagementInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organizational Learning

Open access
Fiol, C. Marlene, Lyles, Marjorie A.·1985·The Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.1985.4279103
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Made available in DSpace on 2012-01-25T22:29:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 organizationalle1110fiol.pdf: 2345197 bytes, checksum: 12afa5e5968bdfcf89bb44624319f158 (MD5) license.txt: 4922 bytes, checksum: 910b249b4beec47e7ab768910c8f966f (MD5) Previous issue date:

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/258048

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 3,385

Metadata

Authors
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A.
Venue
The Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1985-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
803
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5465/amr.1985.4279103
OpenAlex
W4254219547
Cited by
3,385
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 158 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 150 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 147 · 2012: 135
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
organizational learning, knowledge acquisition, knowledge transfer, organizational knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.