Toward a System for Classifying Business Strategies
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The analysis of disclosed qualitative case studies allowed us to identify different AI adoption taxa according to Chrisman et al. (1988).
“The analysis of the disclosed qualitative case studies in the selected sample allowed us to identify different AI adoption taxa according to the Chrisman et al. (1988) taxonomy definition.”
From Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of <scp>AI</scp> applications (2025) · cites this paper as Chrisman et al., 1988
The taxonomy proposes a theory-driven classification of AI applications into replace, reinforce, and reveal.
“The taxonomy proposes a theory-driven classification (Chrisman et al., 1988) of the different applications, namely replace , reinforce , and reveal .”
From Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of <scp>AI</scp> applications (2025) · cites this paper as Chrisman et al., 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12698 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Technology-based, “adolescent” firm configurations
Bantel, K. A. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00033-5 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chrisman, J. J., Hofer, C. W., & Boulton, W. R.
- Affiliations
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Chrisman, James J.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 413
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167492244
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 27.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
- Keywords
- business strategy, strategy classification, classification systems, strategic management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
