The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Donaldson and Preston (1995) explicitly recognize job applicants as stakeholders”
From Cybervetting job applicants on social media: the new normal? (2020) · cites this paper as Donaldson and Preston (1995)
In the citing paper
“Stakeholder theory provides a well-established framework that allows us to: 1. Identify and describe all interested and affected parties in the deployment of a technology 2. Acknowledge stakeholders have legitimate interests in technology 3. Affirm that all stakeholders have intrinsic value, even if their concerns do not align with the concerns of the technology producers”
From Putting AI ethics to work: are the tools fit for purpose? (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications*
McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x · Cited by 3,154
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755
Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.820 · Cited by 2,252
Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030003900302 · Cited by 2,077
Metadata
- Authors
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E.
- ORCID
- Donaldson, Thomas
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233075943
- Cited by
- 5,846
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 590 · 2025: 588 · 2024: 547 · 2023: 600 · 2022: 505 · 2021: 458 · 2020: 310 · 2019: 267 · 2018: 256 · 2017: 216 · 2016: 202 · 2015: 182 · 2014: 179 · 2013: 148 · 2012: 133
- FWCI
- 48.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
- Keywords
- stakeholder theory, corporate governance, firm performance, corporate social responsibility, agency theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
